Advertisement

Biological Networks: Tools, Methods, and Analysis

  • Basharat Ahmad BhatEmail author
  • Garima Singh
  • Rinku Sharma
  • Mifftha Yaseen
  • Nazir Ahmad Ganai
Chapter

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing techniques make it clear that all eukaryotes share significant portions of the genome specifying the core biological functions. Understanding of the biological function of such distributed proteins in one organism can normally be assigned to different species, which ultimately helps in extracting relevant biological information. This can be achieved by examining the basic components individually and then studying how these are connected in a network. Networks help in visualization and understanding the interactions between myriad components of a system that are mainly represented as graphs where different nodes (proteins) are connected via edges. The core biological information portrayal is provided by gene ontology that covers several domains of molecular and cellular biology. In this chapter, we tried to elaborate the data types extracted from various techniques and made them conveniently coherent to the readers through examples. We have also explained the complex biological networks theory comprehensively, following the functional analysis speculations, using real examples from various bioinformatics tools.

Keywords

Gene ontology GO annotation Biological networks AmiGO STRING QuickGO DAVID 

References

  1. Albert R (2005) Scale-free networks in cell biology. J Cell Sci 118:4947–4957PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alberts B et al (2002) Molecular biology of the cell, 4th edn. Garland Science, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Arita M (2004) The metabolic world of Escherichia coli is not small. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:1543–1547PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Bader S, Kühner S, Gavin AC (2008) Interaction networks for systems biology. FEBS Lett 582(8):1220–1224PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Batada NN, Reguly T, Breitkreutz A, Boucher L, Breitkreutz BJ, Hurst LD et al (2006) Stratus not altocumulus: a new view of the yeast protein interaction network. PLoS Biol 4:e317PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Beadle GW, Tatum EL (1941) Genetic control of biochemical reactions in Neurospora. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 27:499–506PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Binns D et al (2009) QuickGO: a web-based tool for Gene Ontology searching. Bioinformatics 25(22):3045–3046PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Blake JA (2013) Ten quick tips for using the gene ontology. PLoS Comput Biol 9(11):e1003343PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Botstein D et al (2000) Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet 25(1):25–29PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Carbon S et al (2008) AmiGO: online access to ontology and annotation data. Bioinformatics 25(2):288–289PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Goh KI, Cusick ME, Valle D, Childs B, Vidal M, Barabási AL (2007) The human disease network. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(21):8685–8690PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Han JD, Bertin N, Hao T, Goldberg DS, Berriz GF, Zhang LV, Dupuy D, Walhout AJ, Cusick ME, Roth FP, Vidal M (2004) Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein–protein interaction network. Nature 430(6995):88–93PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hill DP et al (2008) Gene Ontology annotations: what they mean and where they come from. BMC Bioinf 9(5):S2; BioMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA (2008) Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 4(1):44Google Scholar
  15. Langfelder P, Horvath S (2008) WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinf 9(1):559Google Scholar
  16. Ma’ayan A (2011) Introduction to network analysis in systems biology. Sci Signal 4(190):tr5PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Reference Genome Group of the Gene Ontology Consortium (2009) The Gene Ontology’s Reference Genome Project: a unified framework for functional annotation across species. PLoS Comput Biol 5(7):e1000431Google Scholar
  18. Shannon P et al (2003) Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res 13(11):2498–2504PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Szklarczyk D et al (2016) The STRING database in 2017: quality-controlled protein–protein association networks, made broadly accessible. Nucleic Acids Res.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw937
  20. Weirauch MT (2011) Gene coexpression networks for the analysis of DNA microarray data. In: Applied statistics for network biology: methods in systems biology. Wiley-Blackwell, Weinheim, pp 215–250Google Scholar
  21. Yook SH, Oltvai ZN, Barabási AL (2004) Functional and topological characterization of protein interaction networks. Proteomics 4(4):928–942PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Basharat Ahmad Bhat
    • 1
    Email author
  • Garima Singh
    • 2
  • Rinku Sharma
    • 2
  • Mifftha Yaseen
    • 3
  • Nazir Ahmad Ganai
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Life Sciences, School of Natural SciencesShiv Nadar UniversityGreater NoidaIndia
  2. 2.Department of Life SciencesShiv Nadar UniversityGreater NoidaIndia
  3. 3.School of Interdisciplinary Sciences and TechnologyJamia Hamdard UniversityNew DelhiIndia
  4. 4.Animal Genetics and BreedingSher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology – KashmirSrinagarIndia

Personalised recommendations