Advertisement

Enhancing Brand Commitment through Social Responsibility Associations: A Two-Path Moderated Model

  • Tarek AbidEmail author
  • Marie-Aude Abid-Dupont
  • Jean-Louis Moulins
Conference paper
Part of the Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science book series (DMSPAMS)

Abstract

Social responsibility has become a cornerstone marketing policy, enabling brand differentiation in a high-growth market. By distinguishing between symbolic and utilitarian associations of social responsibility, our study identifies two levers for consumer brand commitment. We posit that utilitarian associations enhance consumer brand commitment by strengthening consumer trust in a context imbued with fear and skepticism about consequences of consumption for health. We also argue that brands can encourage consumer commitment through their environmental and philanthropic engagements by conveying values with which consumers can identify. This second commitment lever is argued to be particularly effective for consumers with strong social/environmental personal norms. We empirically test our research model on a sample of regular consumers of organic food brands validating the two pathways from social responsibility to brand commitment. The moderating role of consumers’ personal norms on the process was also confirmed regarding the philanthropic dimension but not the environmental one. Contributions and implications of these findings are presented in the discussion part.

Keywords

Brand social responsibility Brand commitment Brand trust Brand identification Personal norms 

References

  1. Abid, T., & Moulins, J. L. (2015). Une échelle de mesure de la responsabilité sociétale des marques: Application aux consommateurs de marques alimentaires biologiques. Revue Française du Marketing, 254(4/4), 23–37.Google Scholar
  2. Ahearne, M., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Gruen, T. W. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of customer-company identification: Expanding the role of relationship marketing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(3), 574–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bagozzi, R. P., & Dholakia, U. M. (2006). Antecedents and purchase consequences of customer participation in small group brand communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23, 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bansal, H. S., Irving, P. G., & Taylor, S. F. (2004). A three-component model of customer commitment to service providers. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(3), 234–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baudrillard, J. (1970). La société de consommation, ses mythes, ses structures. Paris: Denoël. (Chapter 2).Google Scholar
  6. Bhatacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why and How consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bibb, S., & Kourdi, J. (2004). Trust matters: For organizational and personal success. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2003). You are what they eat: The influence of reference groups on consumers connections to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 339–348.Google Scholar
  11. Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. (2005). Self-construal, reference group and brand meanings. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 378–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brand: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gruen, T. W., Summers, J. O., & Acito, F. (2000). Relationship marketing activities, commitment, and membership behaviors in professional associations. Journal of Marketing, 64, 34–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gurviez, P., & Korchia, M. (2002). Proposition d’une échelle de mesure multidimensionnelle de la confiance dans la marque. Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 17(3), 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harland, P., Staats, H., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1999). Explaining proenvironmental intention and behavior by personal norms and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(12), 2505–2528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2013). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3), 451–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hildebrand, D., Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2011). Corporate social responsibility: A corporate marketing perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 45(9/10), 1353–1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lacey, R., & Kennet-Hensel, P. A. (2010). Longitudinal effects of corporate social responsibility on consumer relationship. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 581–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lindgreen, A., Swaen, V., & Johnston, W. J. (2009). Corporate social responsibility: An empirical investigation of U.S. organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 5(2/3), 303–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lindgreen, A., Xu, Y., Maon, F., & Wilcock, J. (2012). Corporate social responsibility brand leadership: A multiple case study. European Journal of Marketing, 46(7/8), 965–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Magnusson, M. K., Arvola, A., Hursti, U. K. K., Aberg, L., & Sjödén, P. O. (2003). Choice of organic foods is related to perceived consequences for human health and to environmentally friendly behaviour. Appetite, 40, 109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Maignan, I., Ferrell, O. C., & Ferrell, L. (2005). A stakeholder model for implementing social responsibility in marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 39(9/10), 956–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McEnally, M., & De Chernatony, L. (1999). The evolving nature of branding: Consumer and managerial considerations. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 2, 1626.Google Scholar
  26. Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pérez, A., & Del Bosque, I. J. (2014). The role of CSR in the corporate identity banking service providers. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(2), 145–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Persais, E. (2010). La gestion de la RSE dans un contexte international : vers une “glocalisation” des pratiques ? Une étude de cas d’entreprises françaises implantées au Mexique. Management International, 14(2), 11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pestre, F. (2014). Local, global and transnational CSR strategies in the multinational corporation. Management International, 18, 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating Shared Value, Harvard Business Review, 89(1), 2–17.Google Scholar
  31. Roberts, J. (1995). Profiling levels of socially responsible consumer behaviour: A cluster analytic approach and its implications for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 3(4), 97–117.Google Scholar
  32. Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stafford, L. (2008). Social exchange theories. Chapter 28. In L. A. Baxter & D. O. Braithwaite (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communications: Multiple perspectives (pp. 377–389). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Strahan, R., & Gerbasi, K. C. (1972). Short, homogeneous versions of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28(2), 191–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.Google Scholar
  37. Terrasse C. (2006). L’engagement envers la marque: Proposition d’un modèle théorique et application à la comparaison de la fidélité aux marques nationales et aux marques distributeurs. PhD, Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales, HEC-Paris.Google Scholar
  38. Zao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tarek Abid
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marie-Aude Abid-Dupont
    • 2
  • Jean-Louis Moulins
    • 3
  1. 1.UniLaSalleRouenFrance
  2. 2.University of Toulouse CapitoleToulouseFrance
  3. 3.Aix Marseille UniversitéAix-en-ProvenceFrance

Personalised recommendations