Building Relationships through Stimulating Brand Experiences: The Role of Self-Expansion, Brand Identification, and Self-Esteem

  • Gwarlann de Kerviler
  • Carlos M. RodriguezEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science book series (DMSPAMS)


Luxury brands have the capacity to provide novel and meaningful emotional experiences which enrich consumers’ sense of self. This process is known as self-expansion, a strong motivational factor for developing and nurturing a relationship. As such, luxury consumption offers more than conspicuous or hedonic value; it contributes to an extended sense of self. Such benefit appears particularly attractive for millennials, who are at a stage in their lives when they seek out experiences and search for novelty combined with depth of perspective as well as doable challenges. This study, based on 229 millennials ages 25–39 years old, demonstrates how meaningful experiences strengthen the relationship with luxury brands through self-expansion and highlights the role of brand identification and the moderating effect of self-esteem. The findings shed a new light on the motivations behind luxury purchases, beyond projecting a social image. Luxury brands can also help millennials develop new perspectives, elevate one’s sense of self, enrich their self-concepts, and as such enhance strong customer-brand connection. This view becomes particularly relevant as a counterargument to some criticism to luxury consumption as linked purely to materialistic motivations.


Luxury Self-expansion Millennials Brand experience Relationship 


  1. Arnould, E., & Price, L. (1993). River magic: Extraordinary experience and the extended service encounter. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 24–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aron, A., & Aron, E. (1996). Self and self-expansion in relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Aron, A., Aron, E., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bapat, D., & Thanigan, J. (2016). Exploring relationship among brand experience dimensions, brand evaluation and brand loyalty. Global Business Review, 17, 1357–1372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 139–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blascovich, J., & Tomaka, J. (1991). Measures of self-esteem. Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes, 1, 115–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brakus, J. J., Schmitt, B. H., & Zarantonello, L. (2009). Brand experience: what is it? How is it measured? Does it affect loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 73, 52–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Celsi, R. L., Rose, R. L., & Leigh, T. W. (1993). An exploration of high-risk leisure consumption through skydiving. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Clark, M., & Phillips, J. (2013). The influence of social media on relational outcomes: A relationship marketing perspective. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 5, 132–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. D’Arpizio, C. (2007). Monitor Altagamma 2007 on luxury markets.
  12. Ding, C. G., & Timmy, H. T. (2015). On the relationships among brand experience, hedonic emotions, and brand equity. European Journal of Marketing, 49, 994–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dubois, B., & Laurent, G. (1996). The functions of luxury: A situational approach to excursionism. Advances in Consumer Research, 23, 470–477.Google Scholar
  14. Dubois, B., Laurent, G., & Czellar, S. (2001). Consumer rapport to luxury: analyzing complex and ambivalent attitudes. Jouy-en-Josas: Groupe HEC.Google Scholar
  15. Eastman, J. K., & Liu, J. (2012). The impact of generational cohorts on status consumption: an exploratory look at generational cohort and demographics on status consumption. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29, 93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 343–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gilovich, T., Kumar, A., & Jampol, L. (2015). A wonderful life: Experiential consumption and the pursuit of happiness. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25, 152–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gronhoj, A. (2007). The consumer competence of young adults: a study of newly formed households. Qualtiative Market Research: An International Journal, 10, 243–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hagtvedt, H., & Patrick, V. M. (2009). The broad embrace of luxury: Hedonic potential as a driver of brand extendibility. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19, 608–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heine, K. (2010). Identification and motivation of participants for luxury consumer surveys through viral participant acquisition. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 8, 132–145.Google Scholar
  22. Hennigs, N., Wiedmann, K.-P., & Klarmann, C. (2015). The complexity of value in the luxury industry: From consumers’ individual value perception to luxury consumption. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 43, 922–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kapferer, J.-N., & Bastien, V. (2009). The specificity of luxury management: Turning marketing upside down. Brand Management, 16, 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Keller, K. L. (2009). Managing the growth tradeoff: Challenges and opportunities in luxury branding. Journal of Brand Management, 16, 290–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lam, S., Ahearne, M., & Hu, Y. (2010). Resistance to brand switching when a radically new brand is introduced: A social identity theory perspective. Journal of Marketing, 74, 128–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leary, M. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 2–51.Google Scholar
  27. Lee, S. H., & Sean, L. (2015). The social network implications of prestigious goods among young adults: evaluating the self vs others. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 32, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016). Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. Journal of Marketing, 80, 69–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lewandowski Jr., G.W. & Aron, A. (2002). The self-expansion scale construction and validation. In: Third annual meeting of the society of personality and social psychology, Savannah, GA.Google Scholar
  30. Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 114–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mattingly, B. A., & Lewandowski, G. W. (2014). Expanding the self brick by brick. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 484–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McDonald, M. G., Wearing, S., & Ponting, J. (2009). The nature of peak experience in wilderness. The Humanistic Psychologist, 37, 370–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Morley, J. & McMahon, K. (2011). Innovation, interaction, and inclusion: heritage luxury brands in collusion with the consumer. In Fashion and luxury: Between heritage and innovation. Paris. Paris: Institut Français de la Mode.Google Scholar
  34. Nueno, J. L., & Quelch, J. A. (1998). The mass marketing of luxury. Business Horizons, 41, 61–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. O’Cass, A., & Frost, H. (2002). Status brands: examining the effects of on-product-related brand associations on status and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 11, 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Phau, I., & Prendergast, G. (2000). Consuming luxury brands: The relevance of the ‘Rarity Principle’. Journal of Brand Management, 8, 122–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pine, L. B., & Gilmore, J. H. (1998). Welcome to the experience economy. Harvard Business Review, 76(4), 97–105.Google Scholar
  38. Reed, A., Forehand, M. R., & Puntoni, S. (2012). Identity-based consumer behavior. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29, 310–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reimann, M. & Aron, A. (2009). Self-expansion motivation and inclusion of brands in self. In: Handbook of brand relationships Deborah J. MacInnis, C. Whan Park, Joseph W. Priester (eds) . ArmonkSharpe 65–81.Google Scholar
  40. Rosenberg, M. (1989). Society and the adolescent self-image. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Schouten, J. W., McAlexander, J. H., & Koenig, H. F. (2007). Transcendent customer experience and brand community. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35, 357–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stokburger-Sauer, N., Ratneshwar, S., & Sen, S. (2012). Driver of consumer-brand identification. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29, 406–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Strong, G., & Aron, A. (2006). The effect of shared participation in novel and challenging activities on experienced relationship quality: Is it mediated by high positive affect? New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  44. Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., & Chatelin, Y.-M. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48, 159–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vigneron, F., & Johnson, L. W. (2004). Measuring perceptions of brand luxury. Journal of Brand Management, 11, 484–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang, H.-C., Doong, H.-S., & Shih, H.-C. (2008). An investigation into the determinants of repurchase loyalty in the E-marketplace. In 41st. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 272–282). Hawaii: IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
  47. Wilcox, K., Kim, H. M., & Sen, S. (2009). Why do consumers buy counterfeit luxury brands? Journal of Marketing Research, 46, 247–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IÉSEG School of ManagementParisFrance
  2. 2.Delaware State UniversityDoverUSA

Personalised recommendations