Advertisement

Factors Affecting Attitude and Purchase Intention toward Gray Market Goods

  • Mesut ÇiçekEmail author
  • Selime Demet Sezgin
Conference paper
Part of the Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science book series (DMSPAMS)

Abstract

Gray marketing is the importation and distribution of genuine products without the permission of the authorized distributors and manufacturers. The objective of the study is to reveal which personal (price consciousness, price-quality inferences, risk averseness, ethical judgment, consumer innovativeness, and involvement) and social (informative and normative susceptibility) factors affect consumers’ attitude toward gray market goods and intention. In addition, a comparative study (Turkey vs. the USA) was applied to find out whether the effects of these personal and social factors differ across countries. The model was tested through multi-group structural equation modeling. The results indicated that price consciousness, risk averseness, price-quality interference, and ethical judgment of the Turkish consumers affect their attitudes toward gray market goods. It can be stated that only the ethical judgment of gray market activities affects the US consumers’ attitude toward gray market goods. In addition, the effect of ethical judgment on attitude is stronger for the US consumers than the Turkish consumers. Furthermore, attitude has a positive effect on intention both in Turkey and in the USA. This study provides valuable information to the gray marketing literature.

Keywords

Gray marketing Parallel import Gray market Multi-group SEM 

References

  1. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1973). Attitudinal and normative variables as predictors of specific behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27(1), 41–57.Google Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: PrenticeHall.Google Scholar
  3. Albarq, A. N. (2013). Using structural equation modeling to explore Saudi consumers’ intentions regarding counterfeit goods. American Journal of Business and Management, 2(4), 322–331.Google Scholar
  4. Alford, B. L., & Biswas, A. (2002). The effects of discount level, price consciousness and sale proneness on consumers’ price perception and behavioral intention. Journal of Business Research, 55, 775–783.Google Scholar
  5. Ang, H. S., Sim Cheng, P., Lim, E. A., & Kuan Tambyah, S. (2001). Spot the difference: Consumer responses towards counterfeits. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(3), 219–235.Google Scholar
  6. Assmus, G., & Wiese, C. (1995). How to address the gray market threat using price coordination. Sloan Management Review, 36(3), 31–41.Google Scholar
  7. Bandyopadhyay, S. (2010). The Internet and Gray Marketing. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 9(6), 95–101.Google Scholar
  8. Barnett, T., Bass, K., & Brown, G. (1994). Ethical Ideology and Ethical Judgment Regarding Ethical Issues in Business. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(6), 469–480.Google Scholar
  9. Bearden, W. O., Netemeyer, R. G., & Teel, J. E. (1989). Measurement of consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol., 15(March), 473–481.Google Scholar
  10. Burnaz, S., Atakan, M. S., Topcu, Y. I., & Singhapakdi, A. (2009). An exploratory cross-cultural analysis of marketing ethics: The case of Turkish, Thai, and American businesspeople. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(3), 371–382.Google Scholar
  11. Burton, S., Lichtenstein, D. R., Netemeyer, R. G., & Garretson, J. A. (1998). A Scale for Measuring Attitude toward Private Label Products and An Examination of Its Psychological and Behavioral Correlates. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(4), 293.Google Scholar
  12. Çavuşgil, T. S., & Sikora, E. (1988). How multinationals can counter gray market imports. Columbia Journal of World Business, 23(4), 75–86.Google Scholar
  13. Chen, H. l. (2002). Gray marketing and unfair competition. Atlantic Economic Journal, 30(2), 198–204.Google Scholar
  14. Data.worldbank.org. (2016). GDP per capita (current US$) | Data | Table. Retrieved June 4, 2016 from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD
  15. de Matos, A. C., Trindade Ituassu, C., & Vargas Rossi, C. A. (2007). Consumer Attitudes toward Counterfeits: A Review and Extension. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 24(1), 36–47.Google Scholar
  16. Fan, J. X., & Xiao, J. J. (1998). Consumer decision-making styles of young adult Chinese. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 32, 275–294.Google Scholar
  17. Fernandes, C. (2013). Analysis of Counterfeit Fashion Purchase Behaviour in UAE. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 17(1), 85–97.Google Scholar
  18. Goldsmith, R. E., & Foxall, G. R. (2003). The measurement of innovativeness. In: The international handbook on innovation (pp. 321–330).Google Scholar
  19. Goldsmith, R. E., & Hofacker, C. F. (1991). Measuring consumer innovativeness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19(3), 209–221.Google Scholar
  20. Grewal, D., Krishnan, R., Baker, J., & Borin, N. (1998). The Effect of Store Name, Brand Name and Price Discounts on Consumers’ Evaluations and Purchase Intentions. Journal of Retailing, 74(3), 331–352.Google Scholar
  21. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.Google Scholar
  22. Hirschman, E. C. (1980). Innovativeness, novelty seeking, and consumer creativity. Journal of Consumer Research, 7(3), 283–295.Google Scholar
  23. Hofstede, G. (1980). Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad? Organizational Dynamics, 9(1), 42–63.Google Scholar
  24. Hofstede, G. (1991). Organizations and Cultures: Software of the Mind. New York: McGrawHill.Google Scholar
  25. Huang, J. H., Lee, B. C., & Ho, S. H. (2004). Consumer attitude toward gray market goods. International Marketing Review, 21(6), 598–614.Google Scholar
  26. Ismail, S. S. (2008). Factors influencing attitudes towards gray market cars in Malaysia and intention to buy. Master Dissertation, University of Malaya.Google Scholar
  27. Jin, B., & Sternquist, B. (2003). The influence of retail environment on price perceptions: An exploratory study of US and Korean students. International Marketing Review, 20(6), 643–660.Google Scholar
  28. Lansing, P., & Gabriella, J. (1993). Clarifying gray market gray areas. American Business Law Journal, 31(2), 313–337.Google Scholar
  29. Lee, C., & Green, R. T. (1991). Cross-cultural examination of the Fishbein behavioral intentions model. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(2), 289–305.Google Scholar
  30. Lichtenstein, D. R., Ridgway, N. M., & Netemeyer, R. G. (1993). Price perceptions and consumer shopping behavior: A field study. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(May), 234–245.Google Scholar
  31. Manzur, E., Uribe, R., Hidalgo, P., Olavarrieta, S., & Farías, P. (2012). Comparative advertising effectiveness in Latin America: Evidence from Chile. International Marketing Review, 29(3), 277–298.Google Scholar
  32. March, J. G., & Shapira, Z. (1987). Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Science, 33(11), 1404–1418.Google Scholar
  33. Mathur, L. K. (1995). The impact of international gray marketing on consumers and firms. Journal of Euromarketing, 4(2), 39–59.  https://doi.org/10.1300/J037v04n02_04.Google Scholar
  34. Mollahosseini, A., Karbasi, B. J., & Sadeghi, Z. A. (2012). Investigating the influential factors on purchase intention the ‘gray market’ goods in south-east of Iran. International Business and Management, 4(1), 48–56.Google Scholar
  35. Money, R. B., & Crotts, J. C. (2003). The effect of uncertainty avoidance on information search, planning, and purchases of international travel vacations. Tourism Management, 24(2), 191–202.Google Scholar
  36. Monroe, K. B. (1973). Buyers’ Subjective Perceptions of Price. Journal of Marketing Research, X, 70–80.Google Scholar
  37. Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan, R. (1985 ). The Effects of Price on Subjective Product Evaluations. In0 J. Jacoby & J. C. Olson (Eds.), Perceived quality: How consumers view stores and merchandise, D.C. Health and Company, Lexington, MA.Google Scholar
  38. Myers, M. B. (1999). Incidents of gray market activity among U.S. exporters: Occurrences, characteristics, and consequences. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(1), 105–126.Google Scholar
  39. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 135–146.Google Scholar
  40. Rajendran, K. N., & Tellis, G. J. (1994). Contextual and Temporal Components of Reference Price. The Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 22–34.Google Scholar
  41. Seiders, K., Voss, G. B., Godfrey, A. L., & Grewal, D. (2007). SERVCON: development and validation of a multidimensional service convenience scale. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(1), 144–156.Google Scholar
  42. Shane, S. (1993). Cultural influences on national rates of innovation. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(1), 59–73.Google Scholar
  43. Shaw, D. S., Shiu, E., & Clarke, I. (2000). The contribution of ethical obligation and selfidentity to the theory of planned behaviour: An exploration of ethical consumers. Journal of Marketing Management, 16, 879–894.Google Scholar
  44. Stafford, J. E., & Cocanougher, B. A. (1977), “ Reference Group Theory,” in Selected Aspects of Consumer Behavior (361–380). Washington, D.C.: Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  45. Steenkamp, J. B. E., Hofstede, F. T., & Wedel, M. (1999). A cross-national investigation into the individual and national cultural antecedents of consumer innovativeness. The Journal of Marketing, 63, 55–69.Google Scholar
  46. Teah, M., & Phau, I. (2007). The influence of information susceptibility, normative susceptibility and collectivism on attitudes towards counterfeiting of luxury brands. In Maree Thyne, Kenneth Deans & Juergen Gnoth (Eds.), Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference, Dec 3 2007, pp. 1136-1143. Dunedin: University of Otago.Google Scholar
  47. Vitell, S. J. (2003). Consumer ethics research: Review, synthesis and suggestions for the future. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(1-2), 33–47.Google Scholar
  48. Wang, F., Zhang, H., Zang, H., & Ouyang, M. (2005). University of Otago Purchasing Pirated Software: An Initial Examination of Chinese Consumers. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 22(6), 340–351.Google Scholar
  49. Yasin, N. M., Ramayah, T., Mohamad, O., & Lim, L. W. (2009). The mediating effects of attitude towards parallel imports in consumer personality–purchase intention linkage. Jurnal Pengurusan, 28, 103–123.Google Scholar
  50. Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 341–352.Google Scholar
  51. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. The Journal of Marketing, 52, 2–22.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Yalova UniversityYalovaTurkey
  2. 2.İstanbul Bilgi UniversityİstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations