Advertisement

Toward an Understanding of the Antecedents of E-Marketing Orientation: The Role of the Fit

  • Hui-Ling Huang
  • Yue-Yang ChenEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science book series (DMSPAMS)

Abstract

Nowadays, firms have realized the importance of using the Internet-based technology for supporting services to their customers and suppliers. For achieving a higher value in operating activities, firms must emphasize on R&D and technological development to fit with customer needs and develop the capabilities for searching and acquiring information via e-business tools. Thus, it is important for firms to know how to acquire market information to satisfy customers’ needs. In this vein, electronic marketing (e-Marketing) is regarded as a strategic weapon for firms to accomplish it. It not only includes the deployment of marketing activities in the Internet but also includes using technology to support services for customers. Drawing on the concept of fit, this present research tries to explore the effect of fit between market orientation and IT adoption strategy on e-Marketing orientation (the antecedents of e-Marketing orientation). Empirical data for hypothesis testing are collected from top-ranked companies in Taiwan, yielding 140 valid samples. Performance implications of fit are examined using fit as covariation approach. The findings indicated that the fit of market orientation and IT adoption strategy plays an important role in explaining e-Marketing orientation.

Keywords

Electronic marketing orientation Information technology adoption strategy Fit Market orientation 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This study was funded by the Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology under project number MOST107-2914-I-309-001-A1.

References

  1. Asikhia, O. U. (2009). The moderating role of E-marketing on the consequences of market orientation in Nigerian firms. International Journal of Business and Information, 4(2), 243–270.Google Scholar
  2. Atuahene-Gima, K., Slater, S. F., & Olson, E. M. (2005). The contingent value of responsive and proactive market orientations for new product program performance. Journal of Production Innovation Management, 22(6), 464–482.Google Scholar
  3. Avlonitis, G. J., & Gounaris, S. P. (1997). Marketing orientation and company performance: Industrial vs. consumer goods companies. Industrial Marketing Management, 26, 385–402.Google Scholar
  4. Avlonitis, G. J., & Gounaris, S. P. (1999). Marketing orientation and its determinants: An empirical analysis. European Journal of Marketing, 33(11/12), 1003–1037.Google Scholar
  5. Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M. (1999). The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 27(4), 411–427.Google Scholar
  6. Barua, A., & Lee, B. (1997). An economic analysis of the introduction of an electronic data interchange system. Information Systems Research, 8(4), 398–422.Google Scholar
  7. Becherer, R. C., Halstead, D., & Haynes, P. (2001). Marketing orientation in SMEs: Effects of the internal environment. Journal of Research in Marketing & Entrepreneurship, 3(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
  8. Bergeron, F., Raymond, L., & Rivard, S. (2004). Ideal patterns of strategic alignment and business performance. Information & Management, 41(8), 1003–1020.Google Scholar
  9. Borges, M., Hoppen, N., & Luce, F. B. (2009). Information technology impact on market orientation in e-business. Journal of Business Research, 62, 883–890.Google Scholar
  10. Brady, M., Saren, M., & Tzokas, N. (2002). Integrating information technology into marketing practice-the IT reality of contemporary marketing practice. Journal of Marketing Management, 18(5/6), 555–577.Google Scholar
  11. Brynjolfsson, E. (1993). The productivity paradox of information technology. Communications of the ACM, 36(12), 66–77.Google Scholar
  12. Brynjolfsson, E., & Lorin Hitt, L. (2003). Computing Productivity: Firm Level Evidence. MIT Sloan Working Paper, No. 4210–01.Google Scholar
  13. Capon, N., & Glazer, R. (1987). Marketing and technology: A strategic Coalignment. Journal of Marketing, 51(3), 1–14.Google Scholar
  14. Chan, Y. E., Huff, S., Barclay, D. W., & Copeland, D. G. (1997). Business strategic orientation, information systems strategic orientation, and strategic alignment. Information Systems Research, 8(2), 125–150.Google Scholar
  15. Clemons, E. K., & Row, M. C. (1991). Sustaining IT advantage: The role of structural differences. MIS Quarterly, 15(3), 341–352.Google Scholar
  16. Croteau, A. M., & Bergeron, F. (2001). An information technology trilogy: Business strategy, technological deployment and organizational performance. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 10(2), 77–99.Google Scholar
  17. Day, G. S. (1994). The capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 37–52.Google Scholar
  18. Deshpandé, R., Farley, J. U., & Webster, F. E. (1993). Corporate culture, customer orientation and innovativeness in Japanese firms: A quadrant analyses. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 23–37.Google Scholar
  19. Deshpandé, R., & Wesbster, F. (1989). Organizational culture and marketing: Defining the research. Journal of Marketing, 53(1), 3–17.Google Scholar
  20. Dewan, S., & Min, C. (1997). The substitution of IT for other factors of production: A firm-level analysis. Management Science, 43(12), 1660–1675.Google Scholar
  21. Dixon, D. F. (1990). Marketing as production: The development of a concept. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 18(4), 337–343.Google Scholar
  22. El-Gohary, H. (2010). E-marketing- a literature review from a small businesses perspective. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 1(1), 214–244.Google Scholar
  23. Elliot, G. (1987). The marketing concept: Necessary but sufficient? European Journal of Marketing, 21(2), 20–30.Google Scholar
  24. El Sawy, O. A., Malhotra, A., Gosain, S., & Young, K. M. (1999). IT-intense value innovation in the electronic economy: Insights from Marshall industries. MIS Quarterly, 23(3), 305–335.Google Scholar
  25. Glazer, R. (1991). Marketing in an Information-Intensive Environment: Strategic implications of knowledge as an asset. Journal of Marketing, 36, 223–238.Google Scholar
  26. Grönroos, C. (2001). Service management and marketing: A customer relationship management approach (2nd ed.). NY: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  27. Hamidi, A., & Safabakhsh, M. (2011). The impact of information technology on E. marketing. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 365–368.Google Scholar
  28. Henderson, J. C., & Venkatraman, N. (1993). Strategic alignment: Leveraging information Technology for Transforming Organizations. IBM Systems Journal, 32(1), 4–16.Google Scholar
  29. Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 53–70.Google Scholar
  30. Kalakota, R., & Robinson, M. (2001). E-Business 2.0: Roadmap for Success. Boston: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  31. Kirca, A. H., Jayachandran, S., & Bearden, W. O. (2005). Market orientation: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and impact on performance. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 24–41.Google Scholar
  32. Kobylanski, A., & Szulc, R. (2011). Development of marketing orientation in small and medium-sized enterprises evidence from Eastern Europe. International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, 4(1), 49–59.Google Scholar
  33. Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1–18.Google Scholar
  34. Kotler, P. (2000). Marketing management-analysis, planning implementation and control (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  35. Liu, S. S., Luo, X., & Shi, Y. (2003). Market-oriented organizations in an emerging economy: A study of missing links. Journal of Business Research, 56, 481–491.Google Scholar
  36. Lu, Y. G., & Wang, E. T. G. (2011). IT applications that support market orientation and marketing capabilities: Two vital ingredients for e-business success. Journal of Business, 13(3), 491–516.Google Scholar
  37. Min, S., Song, S., & Keebler, J. S. (2002). An internet-mediated market orientation (IMO): Building a theory. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 10(2), 1–11.Google Scholar
  38. Nakata, C., & Zhu, Z. (2006). Information technology and customer orientation: A study of direct, mediated, and interactive linkages. Journal of Marketing Management., 22(3), 319–354.Google Scholar
  39. Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 20–35.Google Scholar
  40. Narver, J. C., Slater, S. F., & MacLachlan, D. L. (2004). Responsive and proactive market orientation and new-product success. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(5), 334–347.Google Scholar
  41. Olson, E. M., Slater, S. F., & Hult, T. M. (2005). The performance implications of fit among business strategy, marketing organization structure, and strategic behavior. Journal of Marketing, 69(1), 49–65.Google Scholar
  42. Papp, R. (1999). Business-IT alignment: Productivity paradox payoff? Industrial Management & Data Systems, 99(8), 367–373.Google Scholar
  43. Prasad, V. K., Ramamurthy, K., & Naidu, G. M. (2001). The influence of internet-marketing integration on marketing competencies and export performance. Journal of International Marketing, 9(4), 82–110.Google Scholar
  44. Premkumar, G., Ramamurthy, K., & Crum, M. R. (1997). Determinants of EDI adoption in the transportation industry. European Journal of Information Systems, 6(2), 107–121.Google Scholar
  45. Ross, J. W., & Beath, C. M. (1996). Develop long-term competitiveness through IT assets. Sloan Management Review, 38(1), 31–42.Google Scholar
  46. Sabherwal, R., & Grant, J. H. (1994). Integrating external and internal perspectives of strategic information technology decisions. In N. Venkatraman & J. Henderson (Eds.), Research in strategic management and information technology. London: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  47. Shafer, S. M., & Byrd, T. A. (2000). A framework for measuring the efficiency of organizational investments in information technology using data envelopment analysis. Omega, 28(2), 125–141.Google Scholar
  48. Shaltoni, A., & West, D. (2010). The measurement of e-marketing orientation (EMO) in business-to-business markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 39, 1097–1102.Google Scholar
  49. Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1995). Market oriented and the learning organization. Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 63–74.Google Scholar
  50. Srinivasan, R., Lilien, G., & Rangaswamy, A. (2002). Technological opportunism and radical technology adoption: An application to E-business. Journal of Marketing, 66(3), 47–60.Google Scholar
  51. Stratopoulos, T., & Dehning, B. (2000). Does successful Investment in Information Technology Solve the productivity paradox. Information & Management, 38(2), 103–117.Google Scholar
  52. Strauss, J., EI-ansary, A., & Frost, R. (2006). E-marketing. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  53. Tallon, P. P., & Pinsonneault, A. (2011). Competing perspectives on the link between strategic information technology alignment and organizational agility: Insights from a mediation model. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 463–486.Google Scholar
  54. Talvinen, J. M. (1995). Information Systems in Marketing: Identifying opportunities for new applications. European Journal of Marketing, 29(1), 8–26.Google Scholar
  55. Trainor, K. J., Rapp, A., Beitelspacher, L. S., & Schillewaert, N. (2011). Integrating information technology and marketing: An examination of the drivers and outcomes of e-marketing capability. Industrial Marketing Management, 40, 162–174.Google Scholar
  56. Tsiotsou, R., & Vlachopoulou, M. (2009). E-marking orientation: Conceptualization and scale development. In Proceedings of 2nd Biennial International Conference on Services Marketing, Thessaloniki, Greece, pp. 580–590.Google Scholar
  57. Tsiotsou, R. H., & Vlachopoulou, M. (2011). Understanding the effects of market orientation and e-marketing on service performance. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 29(2), 141–155.Google Scholar
  58. Venkatraman, N. (1989). The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. The Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 423–444.Google Scholar
  59. Venkatraman, N. (1990). Performance implications of strategic Coalignment: A methodological perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 27(1), 19–41.Google Scholar
  60. Voola, R., Casimir, G., Carlson, J., & Agnihotri, M. A. (2012). The effects of market orientation, technological opportunism, and E-business adoption on performance: A moderated mediation analysis. Australasian Marketing Journal, 20, 136–146.Google Scholar
  61. Vorhies, D. W., & Morgan, N. A. (2003). A configuration theory assessment of marketing organization fit with business strategy and its relationship with marketing performance. Journal of Marketing, 67(1), 100–115.Google Scholar
  62. Wehmeyer, K. (2005). Aligning IT and marketing-the impact of database marketing and CRM. Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management, 12(3), 243–256.Google Scholar
  63. Zhu, K. (2004). The complementarity of information technology infrastructure and E-commerce capability: A resource-based assessment of their business value. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(1), 167–202.Google Scholar
  64. Zhu, Z., & Nakata, C. (2007). Reexamining the link between customer orientation and business performance: The role of information systems. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 15(3), 187–203.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chang Jung Christian UniversityTainan CityTaiwan
  2. 2.I-Shou UniversityKaohsiung CityTaiwan

Personalised recommendations