Advertisement

Antecedents of Consumer Ethical Decision-Making: A Multidimensional Analysis of Emotions, Moral Intensity, Moral Philosophies, Personal Norms, and Intrinsic Religiosity

  • Marco EscadasEmail author
  • Marjan S. Jalali
  • Minoo Farhangmehr
Conference paper
Part of the Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science book series (DMSPAMS)

Abstract

Understanding how consumer ethical decision-making is formed and how ethical judgments and behaviors can be promoted is of growing interest in the marketing research agenda. Notwithstanding, there have been calls for additional research focusing on the development of integrated and more comprehensive theoretical backgrounds to improve models’ explanatory and predictive capability. Thus, this research has two main objectives: first, to test the influence of consumer emotions, moral intensity, moral philosophies, personal norms, and intrinsic religiosity on consumer ethical decision-making process and, second, to assess the relative weight of each independent construct on consumer deliberation processes involving ethical issues. Through a valid sample of 413 respondents and using 3 different ethical scenarios, results show that emotions, moral intensity, and personal norms positively influence consumer ethical decision-making. Furthermore, emotion is the dimension that most influences consumers’ ethical choices and actions, providing empirical evidence of their key role in predicting consumer ethics.

Keywords

Consumer ethics Ethical decision-making Emotions Moral intensity Personal norms 

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5(4), 432–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antonetti, P., & Maklan, S. (2014a). Exploring postconsumption guilt and pride in the context of sustainability. Psychology and Marketing, 31(9), 717–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Antonetti, P., & Maklan, S. (2014b). Feelings that make a difference: How guilt and pride convince consumers of the effectiveness of sustainable consumption choices. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(1), 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bagozzi, R., Baumgartner, H., & Pieters, R. (1998). Goal-directed Emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 12(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Callanan, G., Rotenberry, P., Perri, D., & Oehlers, P. (2010). Contextual factors as moderators of the effect of employee ethical ideology on ethical decision-making. International Journal of Management, 27(1), 52–75.Google Scholar
  7. Chen, M., Pan, C., & Pan, M. (2009). The joint moderating impact of moral intensity and moral judgment on consumer’s use intention of pirated software. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(3), 361–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cottone, J., Drucker, P., & Javier, R. (2007). Predictors of moral reasoning: Components of executive functioning and aspects of religiosity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 46(1), 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Craft, J. (2013). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 2004–2011. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(2), 221–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2009). Morality and prosocial behavior: The role of awareness, responsibility, and norms in the norm activation model. The Journal of Social Psychology, 149(4), 425–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferrell, O., & Gresham, L. (1985). A contingency framework for understanding ethical decision making in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49(3), 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Forsyth, D. (1980). A taxonomy of ethical ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(1), 175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frey, B. (2000). The impact of moral intensity on decision making in a business context. Journal of Business Ethics, 26(3), 181–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gaudine, A., & Thorne, L. (2001). Emotion and ethical decision-making in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 31(2), 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Global Retail Theft Barometer. (2015). Global retail theft barometer 2014–2015. Retrieved from www.GlobalRetailTheftBarometer.com
  17. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science (New York, N.Y.), 316(5827), 998–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis: Pearson new international edition (7th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  20. Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. J. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6(1), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones, T. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Karande, K., Shankarmahesh, M., Rao, C., & Rashid, Z. (2000). Perceived moral intensity, ethical perception, and ethical intention of American and Malaysian managers: A comparative study. International Business Review, 9(1), 37–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lehnert, K., Craft, J., Singh, N., & Park, Y. (2016). The human experience of ethics: A review of a decade of qualitative ethical decision-making research. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(4), 498–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lehnert, K., Park, Y., & Singh, N. (2015). Research note and review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: Boundary conditions and extensions. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(1), 195–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marques, P. A., & Azevedo-Pereira, J. (2009). Ethical ideology and ethical judgments in the Portuguese accounting profession. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(2), 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marta, J., Singhapakdi, A., & Kraft, K. (2008). Personal characteristics underlying ethical decisions in marketing situations: A survey of small business managers. Journal of Small Business Management, 46(4), 589–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McDaniel, S. W., & Burnett, J. J. (1990). Consumer religiosity and retail store evaluation criteria. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 18(2), 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McMahon, J., & Harvey, R. (2007). The effect of moral intensity on ethical judgment. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(4), 335–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(4), 375–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Onwezen, M., Antonides, G., & Bartels, J. (2013). The norm activation model: An exploration of the functions of anticipated pride and guilt in pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology, 39, 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pan, Y., & Sparks, J. R. (2012). Predictors, consequence, and measurement of ethical judgments: Review and meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 65(1), 84–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reidenbach, R., & Robin, D. (1990). Toward the development of a multidimensional scale for improving evaluations of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(8), 639–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rest, J. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  35. Robertson, D., Snarey, J., Ousley, O., Harenski, K., Bowman, F. D., Gilkey, R., & Kilts, C. (2007). The neural processing of moral sensitivity to issues of justice and care. Neuropsychologia, 45(4), 755–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ruedy, N. E., Moore, C., Gino, F., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2013). The cheater’s high: The unexpected affective benefits of unethical behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(4), 531–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Salvador, R., & Folger, R. G. (2009). Business ethics and the brain. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(01), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schwartz, M. S. (2016). Ethical decision-making theory: An integrated approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(4), 755–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 221–279). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  40. Singh, J. J., Garg, N., Govind, R., & Vitell, S. J. (2016). Anger strays, fear refrains: The differential effect of negative emotions on consumers’ ethical judgments. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–14.Google Scholar
  41. Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S., & Franke, G. (1999). Antecedents, consequences, and mediating effects of perceived moral intensity and personal moral philosophies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(1), 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S., Lee, D., Nisius, A., & Yu, G. (2013). The influence of love of money and religiosity on ethical decision-making in marketing. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(1), 183–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Siu, N., Dickinson, J., & Lee, B. (2000). Ethical evaluations of business activities and personal religiousness. Teaching Business Ethics, 4(3), 239–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2008). Ethical decision making: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 545–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Trevino, L. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Trevino, L., Weaver, G., & Reynolds, S. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vitell, S., Bing, M., Davison, H. K., Ammeter, A. P., Garner, B. L., & Novicevic, M. M. (2009). Religiosity and moral identity: The mediating role of self-control. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(4), 601–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vitell, S. J., King, R. A., & Singh, J. J. (2013). A special emphasis and look at the emotional side of ethical decision-making. AMS Review, 3(2), 74–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vitell, S. J., & Patwardhan, A. (2008). The role of moral intensity and moral philosophy in ethical decision making: A cross-cultural comparison of China and the European Union. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17(2), 196–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vitell, S., Paolillo, J., & Singh, J. (2005). Religiosity and consumer ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 57(2), 175–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yacout, O., & Vitell, S. (2018). Ethical consumer decision-making: The role of need for cognition and affective responses. Business Ethics: A European Review, 27(2), 178–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zeelenberg, M., van Dijk, W., Manstead, A., & vanr de Pligt, J. (2000). On bad decisions and disconfirmed expectancies: The psychology of regret and disappointment. Cognition & Emotion, 14(4), 521–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marco Escadas
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marjan S. Jalali
    • 2
  • Minoo Farhangmehr
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MinhoBragaPortugal
  2. 2.ISCTE Business SchoolLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations