Advertisement

Literature Review

  • Soumyananda Dinda
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Environmental Science book series (BRIEFSENVIRONMENTAL)

Abstract

This chapter reviews the existing literature focusing on background of trade debate, environmental degradation and climate issues. It emphasizes on history of trade gravity model and highlights major empirical trade gravity findings in developed and developing countries.

Keywords

EKC NAFTA Kyoto agreement Technology transfer Trade diversity Climate change Environmental degradation EGS CFGT Potential trade Doha round Trade gravity model Gravity equation RTA Efficient technology Cross-border trade Clean product Energy-efficient technology Asian financial crisis Global financial crisis Emerging market 

References

  1. Anderson, J.E. 1979. A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation. American Economic Review 69 (1): 106–116.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, J.E., and E. van Wincoop. 2003. Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle. American Economic Review 93 (1): 170–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ———. 2004. Trade Costs. Journal of Economic Literature 42 (3): 691–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Antweiler, Werner, Brian R. Copeland, and M. Scott Taylor. 2001. Is Free Trade Good for the Environment? American Economic Review 91 (4): 877–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baldwin, R.E. 1994. Towards an Integrated Europe. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.Google Scholar
  6. Baldwin, R.E., and Taglioni, D. 2006. Gravity for Dummies and Dummies for Gravity Equations, NBER Working Paper No. W12516.Google Scholar
  7. Balistreri, E.J., and R.H. Hillberry. 2006. Trade Frictions and Welfare in the Gravity Model: How Much of the Iceberg Melt? Canadian Journal of Economics 39: 247–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bergstrand, J.H. 1985. The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics 67 (3): 474–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Copeland, B.R., and M. Scott Taylor. 2004. Trade and Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dean, Judith M., Mary E. Lovely, and Hua Wang. 2009. Are Foreign Investors Attracted to Weak Environmental Regulations? Evidence from China. Journal of Development Economics 90 (1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deardorff, Alan V. 1995. Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World?, NBER Working Papers No. 5377.Google Scholar
  12. Dinda, S. 2004. Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey. Ecological Economics 49: 431–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ———. 2011a. Trade Opportunities for Climate Smart Goods and Technologies in Asia, paper presented at MSM 1st Annual Research Conference Nov 11–12, 2011.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 2011b. Climate Change and Development: Trade Opportunities of Climate Smart Goods and Technologies in Asia, MPRA Paper No. 34883.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 2014a. Climate Change and Trade Opportunity in Climate Smart Goods in Asia: Application of Gravity Model. The International Trade Journal 28 (3): 264–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. ———. 2014b. Climate Change: An Emerging Trade Opportunity in South Asia. South Asian Journal of Macroeconomics and Public Finance 3 (2): 221–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Drysdale, P., and R. Garnaut. 1982. Trade Intensities and the Analysis of Bilateral Trade Flows in a Many-Country World: A Survey. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics 22 (2): 62–84.Google Scholar
  18. Egger, P. 2002. An Econometric View on the Estimation of Gravity Models and the Calculation of Trade Potentials. The World Economy 25 (2): 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frankel, J.A., E. Stain, and S.J. Wei. 1997. Regional trading blocs in the world economic system. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  20. Grossman, G.M., and A.B. Krueger. 1995. Economic Growth and the Environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 (14): 353–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harrigan, J. 2001. Specialization and the Volume of Trade: Do the Data Obey the Laws?, National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Papers, 8675.Google Scholar
  22. Helpman, E. 1987. Imperfect Competition and International Trade: Evidence from Fourteen Industrial Countries. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 1: 62–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jha, Veena. 2008. Environmental Priorities and Trade Policy for Environmental Goods: A reality Check, ICTSD Issue Paper No 7, September.Google Scholar
  24. Liddle, B. 2001. Free Trade and the Environment-Development System. Ecological Economics 39 (1): 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Linnemann, H. 1966. An Econometric Study of International Trade Flows. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  26. Martínez-Zarzoso, I., and F. Nowak-Lehmann. 2003. Augmented gravity model: An empirical application to Mercosur– European trade flows. Journal of Applied Economics 6 (002): 291–316.Google Scholar
  27. McCallum, J. 1995. National Borders Matter: Canada–U.S. Regional Trade Patterns. American Economic Review 85 (3): 615–623.Google Scholar
  28. Meyer-Ohlendorf, Nils and Gerstetter, Christiane. 2009. Trade and Climate Change – Triggers or Barriers for Climate Friendly Technology Transfer and Development? Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Occasional Paper No 41/February 2009, Berlin.Google Scholar
  29. Mukhopadhyay, K., and D. Chakraborty. 2005. Is Liberalization of Trade Good for the Environment? Evidence from India. Asia-Pacific Development Journal 12 (1): 109–136.Google Scholar
  30. Nilsson, L. 2000. Trade Integration and the EU Economic Membership Criteria. European Journal of Political Economy 16: 807–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Selden, T., and D. Song. 1994. Environmental quality and development: is there a Kuznets Curve for air pollution emissions? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 147: 147–1614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tinbergen, J. 1962. Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund.Google Scholar
  33. World Bank. 1992. World Development Report. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. ———. 2008. International Trade and Climate Change: Economic, Legal and Institutional Perspectives, the World Bank. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Soumyananda Dinda
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of BurdwanBurdwanIndia

Personalised recommendations