Advertisement

Research Methods

  • Morgan R. Clevenger
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter highlights the organization of the single-embedded case study including the research methods process, the participant recruitment of the University and six business partners, and the types of data collected and analyzed including interviews, document and audio-visual materials, and a campus forensic observation. Each of the six participant businesses and the university are described.

References

  1. Angrosino, M. V., & Mays de Perez, K. A. (2000). Rethinking observation. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 673–702). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Bernard, H. R., & Ryan, G. W. (2010). Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Bloomberg, L. D., & Volpe, M. (2012). Completing your qualitative dissertation: A road map from beginning to end. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Boeninger, C. (2010). What are NAICS and SIC industry codes and how do I use them? Retrieved from http://www.library.ohio.edu/subjects/businessblog/what-are-naics-and-sic-industry-codes-and-how-do-i-use-them/
  5. Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. D. (2008). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Brewer, J. D. (2000). Ethnography. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Brock, D. (2007, July 5). Focus on a customer’s need to buy, not on your need to sell. EyesOnSales. Retrieved from http://www.eyesonsales.com/content/article/focus_on_a_customers_need_to_buy_not_your_need_to_sell
  8. Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Burlingame, D. F., & Frishkoff, P. A. (1996). How does firm size affect corporate philanthropy? In D. F. Burlingame & D. R. Young (Eds.), Corporate philanthropy at the crossroads (pp. 86–104). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.Google Scholar
  10. Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2017). Business & society: Ethics, sustainability, and stakeholder management (10th ed.). Mason, OH: Thomson South-Western.Google Scholar
  11. Carty, C. M., & Blank, H. D. (2003, January). The Fortune 500 vs. the S&P 500. Financial Advisor Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.fa-mag.com/component/content/article/624.html?issue=28&magazineID=1&Itemid=27
  12. Cheeseman, H. (2012). Business law: Legal environment, online commerce, business ethics, and international issues (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  13. Clevenger, M. R. (2014). An organizational analysis of the inter-organizational relationships between a public American higher education university and six United States corporate supporters: An instrumental, ethnographic case study using Cone’s corporate citizenship spectrum. ProQuest published doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO. Retrieved from https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/handle/10355/45866
  14. Cohen, A. M. (2010). The shaping of American higher education: Emergency and growth of the contemporary system (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  15. Cone, C. (2010, October 27). The new era of global corporate citizenship & compliance. Presentation at Net Impact Conference, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  16. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
  17. Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
  18. dedoose. (2013). Version 4.5, web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data. Los Angeles, CA: SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC.Google Scholar
  19. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2003). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Drezner, N. D. (2011). Philanthropy and fundraising in American higher education. ASHE Higher Education Report, 37(2) San Francisco, CA: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Erickson, F. (2011). A history of qualitative inquiry in social and educational research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 43–59). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Fischer, M. (2000). Ethical decision making in fund raising. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. Frishkoff, P., & Kostecka, A. (1991). Business contributions to community service. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University.Google Scholar
  29. Gould, E. (2003). The university in a corporate culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of interview research: Context and method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Hesse-Biber, S. N., & Leavy, P. (2008). Handbook of emergent methods. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hodder, I. (2000). The interpretation of documents and material culture. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 703–715). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (2011). The constructionist analytics of interpretive practice. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 341–357). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Jacobson, H. K. (Ed.). (1978). Evaluating advancement programs: New directions for institutional advancement. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  35. Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2008). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Kaplan, A. E. (2007). 2006 voluntary support of education. New York, NY: Council for Aid to Education.Google Scholar
  37. Kaplan, A. E. (2008). 2007 voluntary support of education. New York, NY: Council for Aid to Education.Google Scholar
  38. Kaplan, A. E. (2009). 2008 voluntary support of education. New York, NY: Council for Aid to Education.Google Scholar
  39. Kaplan, A. E. (2010). 2009 voluntary support of education. New York, NY: Council for Aid to Education.Google Scholar
  40. Kaplan, A. E. (2011). 2010 voluntary support of education. New York, NY: Council for Aid to Education.Google Scholar
  41. Kapstein, M. (2007, Autumn). Ethical guidelines for compiling corporate social reports. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 27, 71–91.Google Scholar
  42. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. LeCompte, M. D., & Schensul, J. J. (1999). Analyzing & interpreting ethnographic data. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  44. Levy, R. (2001). Corporate philanthropy comes of age: Its size, its import its future. In C. T. Clotfelter & T. Ehrlich (Eds.), Philanthropy and the nonprofit sector (pp. 99–121). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.Google Scholar
  45. Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. McNaught, C., & Lam, P. (2010). Using wordle as a supplementary research tool. The Qualitative Review, 15(3), 630–643.Google Scholar
  47. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  48. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  49. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  50. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  51. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Miller, G. (1997). Contextualizing texts: Studying organizational texts. In G. Miller & R. Dingwall (Eds.), Context & method in qualitative research (pp. 78–91). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Morgan, G. (2006). Images of organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Morris, L. L., Friz-Gibbon, C. T., & Freeman, M. E. (1987). How to communicate evaluation findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  55. National Science Foundation (NSF). (2011). Table 13. Higher education R&D expenditures ranked by FY 2011 R&D expenditures: FY 2004–11. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf13325/pdf/nsf13325.pdf
  56. Neyland, D. (2008). Organizational ethnography. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nicol, A. A. M., & Pexman, P. M. (2010). Presenting your findings: A practical guide for creating tables (6th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  58. Odendahl, T., & Shaw, A. M. (2001). Interviewing elites. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 299–316). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  59. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  60. Ramlo, S. (2011). Using word clouds to present Q methodology data and findings. Human Subjectivity, 9(2), 99–111.Google Scholar
  61. Rhodes, F. H. T. (2001). The creation of the future: The role of the American University. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
  62. Ringleb, A. H., Meiners, R. E., & Edwards, F. L. (1997). Managing in the legal environment (3rd ed.). St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  63. Robbins, S., & Stylianou, A. C. (2003). Global corporate web sites: An empirical investigation of content and design. Information & Management, 40, 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rose, A. P. (2011). Giving by the numbers 2011. New York, NY: Committee Encouraging Corporate Philanthropy.Google Scholar
  65. Rosen, M. (1991). Coming to terms with the field: Understanding and doing organizational ethnography. Journal of Management Studies, 28(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  67. Saul, J. (2011). The end of fundraising: Raise more money selling your impact. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  68. Seidman, I. E. (1991). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  69. Sheldon, K. S. (2000). Successful corporate fundraising: Effective strategies for today’s nonprofits. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  70. Shuy, R. W. (2001). In-person versus telephone interviewing. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 537–555). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  71. Srivastava, P., & Hopwood, N. (2009). A practical iterative framework for qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 76–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  73. Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443–466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  74. Steinbock, D. (2013). What Is TagCrowd? Retrieved from www.tagcrowd.com/faq.html
  75. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  76. The 2010 Corporate Social Responsibility Index. (2010). The 2010 Corporate Social Responsibility Index. Retrieved from http://www.bcccc.net/pdf/CSRIReport2010.pdf
  77. U.S. Census. (2008). Statistics of U.S. businesses: Latest SUSB data. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/econ/susb/
  78. U.S. Department of Labor. (2012). North American industry classification system (NAICS). Retrieved from http://www.osha.gov/oshastats/naics-manual.html
  79. U.S. Small Business Administration. (2011). Table of small business size standards matched to North American industry classification system codes. Retrieved from http://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/Size_Standards_Table.pdf
  80. Viégas, F. B., & Wattenberg, M. (2008, July–August). Tag clouds and the case for vernacular visualization. Interactions, 15, 49–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Weitzman, E. A., & Miles, M. B. (1995). Computer programs for qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  82. Wolcott, H. F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  83. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  84. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Morgan R. Clevenger
    • 1
  1. 1.Post-doctoral Fellow in Corporate Social Responsibility and Global Business EthicsMonarch Business SchoolZugSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations