Advertisement

Identifying the Dominant Narrative: Non-ethnoracial Readings of Matthew 26–27

  • Wongi Park
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter traces the dominant narrative surrounding the interpretation of the title ὁ βασιλεὺς τῶν Ἰουδαίων in Matthew’s passion narrative. Two representative trajectories of the dominant narrative are identified: traditional religious-theological readings and more recent socio-political readings. Both approaches exhibit a peculiar pattern of bypassing and overlooking the title’s ethnoracial dimensions. To better understand the non-ethnoracial pattern of interpretation, a larger view of Matthean scholarship is required. When this curious pattern is considered within a broader perspective that includes the history of methods, a more compelling account of their interdependence begins to emerge. Paying close attention to the link between the two underscores how the underlying problem of the dominant narrative is methodological through and through.

References

  1. Anderson, Janice C. 1983. Matthew: Gender and Reading. Semeia 28: 3–27.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, Janice C., and Stephen D. Moore. 2008. Mark & Method: New Approaches in Biblical Studies. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bailey, Randall C. 2003. Yet with a Steady Beat: Contemporary U.S. Afrocentric Biblical Interpretation. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
  4. Berg, InHee C. 2014. Irony in the Matthean Passion Narrative. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  5. Blount, Brian K., Cain H. Felder, Clarice J. Martin, and Emerson B. Powery. 2007. True to Our Native Land: An African American New Testament Commentary. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bond, Helen K. 1998. Pontius Pilate in History and Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, Michael J. 2004. Blackening of the Bible: The Aims of African American Biblical Scholarship. Harrisburg: Trinity Press International.Google Scholar
  8. Bruner, Frederick D. 2004. Matthew: A Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
  9. Carter, Warren. 2000. Matthew and the Margins: A Socio-Political and Religious Reading. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 2001. Matthew and Empire: Initial Explorations. Harrisburg: Trinity Press International.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 2003. Pontius Pilate: Portraits of a Roman Governor. Collegeville: Liturgical Press.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2004. Matthew: Storyteller, Interpreter, Evangelist. 2nd ed. Peabody: Hendrickson.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 2005. Matthaean Christology in Roman Imperial Key: Matthew 1.1. In Gospel of Matthew in Its Roman Imperial Context, 143–165. London: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 2009. The Gospel of Matthew. In A Postcolonial Commentary on the New Testament Writings, ed. Fernando F. Segovia and R.S. Sugirtharajah, 69–104. London: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
  15. Cicero, Against Verres 2.5.64. LCL: Cicero, The Verrine Orations.Google Scholar
  16. Collins, John J. 1990. Is a Critical Biblical Theology Possible? In The Hebrew Bible and Its Interpreters, ed. William Henry Prop, Baruch Halpern, and David Noel Freeman, vol. 1, 1–18. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 2005. The Bible After Babel: Historical Criticism in a Postmodern Age. Grand Rapids/Cambridge: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
  18. Dahl, Nils A. 1991. The Crucified Messiah. In Jesus the Christ: The Historical Origins of Christological Doctrine, ed. Donald H. Juel, 27–47. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  19. Davies, W.D., and Dale C. Allison. 1988. The Gospel According to Saint Matthew. The International Critical Commentary, 3 vols. Edinburgh: T&T Clark Limited.Google Scholar
  20. De La Torre, Miguel A. 2002. Reading the Bible from the Margins. Maryknoll: Orbis Books.Google Scholar
  21. Dobbs-Allsopp, F.W. 1999. Rethinking Historical Criticism. Biblical Interpretation 7 (3): 235–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Felder, Cain H. 1989. Troubling Biblical Waters: Race, Class, and Family. Maryknoll: Orbis Books.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 1991. Stony the Road We Trod: African American Biblical Interpretation. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  24. ———. 1993. Cultural Ideology, Afrocentrism, and Biblical Interpretation. In Black Theology: A Documentary History, ed. James H. Cone and Gayraud Wilmore, 2 vols., 184–195. Maryknoll: Orbis.Google Scholar
  25. ———. 2002. Race, Racism, and the Biblical Narratives. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  26. Foskett, Mary F., and Jeffrey K. Kuan. 2006. Ways of Being, Ways of Reading: Asian American Biblical Interpretation. St. Louis: Chalice Press.Google Scholar
  27. France, R.T. 2007. The Gospel of Matthew. Grand Rapids/Cambridge: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
  28. Fuery, Patrick, and Nick Mansfield. 2000. Cultural Studies and Critical Theory. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Gundry, Robert H. 1994. Matthew: A Commentary on His Handbook for a Mixed Church Under Persecution. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
  30. Hagner, Donald. 1999. The Gospel of Matthew. In The New Testament Today, ed. Mark A. Powell, 31–44. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hagner, Donald A., and Stephen E. Young. 2006. The Place of Exegesis in the Postmodern World. In History and Exegesis: New Testament Essays in Honor of Dr. E. Earle Ellis for His 80th Birthday, ed. Sang-Won Son, 292–308. New York: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
  32. ———. 2009. The Historical-Critical Method and the Gospel of Matthew. In Methods for Matthew, ed. Mark Alan Powell, 11–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Harrington, Daniel J. 1991. The Gospel of Matthew. Collegeville: Liturgical Press.Google Scholar
  34. Harvey, Van Austin. 1966. The Historian and the Believer. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  35. Hengel, Martin. 1995. Studies in Early Christology. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
  36. Hopkins, Dwight N., and Edward P. Antonio. 2012. The Cambridge Companion to Black Theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Isasi-Díaz, Ada M., and Fernando F. Segovia, eds. 1996. Hispanic/Latino Theology: Challenge and Promise. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  38. Josephus, Antiquities and Jewish War.Google Scholar
  39. Kingsbury, Jack D. 1988. Matthew as Story. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  40. Kitzberger, Ingrid Rosa, ed. 1999. The Personal Voice in Biblical Interpretation. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Levenson, Jon D. 1993. The Hebrew Bible, the Old Testament and Historical Criticism. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.Google Scholar
  42. Liew, Tat-Siong Benny. 2008. What Is Asian American Biblical Hermeneutics? Reading the New Testament. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  43. Lozada, Francisco, Jr., and Fernando F. Segovia. 2014. Latino/a Biblical Hermeneutics: Problematics, Objectives, Strategies. Atlanta: SBL Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Malina, Bruce J., and Jerome H. Neyrey. 1988. Calling Jesus Names: The Social Value of Labels in Matthew. Sonoma: Polebridge Press.Google Scholar
  45. Malina, Bruce J., and Richard L. Rohrbaugh. 1992. Social Science Commentary on the Synoptic Gospels. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  46. Marchal, Joseph A., ed. 2012. Studying Paul’s Letters: Contemporary Perspectives and Methods. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  47. Marcus, Joel. 2006. Crucifixion as Parodic Exaltation. Journal of Biblical Literature 125 (1): 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Martial. 1937. Epigrams (trans: Shackleton Bailey, D. R., 3 vols.). Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Meier, John P. 1978. The Vision of Matthew: Christ, Church and Morality in the First Gospel. New York: Paulist.Google Scholar
  50. Moore, Stephen D., and Yvonne Sherwood. 2011. The Invention of the Biblical Scholar: A Critical Manifesto. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  51. Myles, Robert J. 2014. The Homeless Jesus in the Gospel of Matthew. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press.Google Scholar
  52. Nealon, Jeffrey T., and Susan S. Giroux. 2012. The Theory Toolbox: Critical Concepts for the Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  53. Nolland, John. 2005. The Gospel of Matthew: A Commentary on the Greek Text. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
  54. Powell, Mark Alan. 1999. The New Testament Today. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.Google Scholar
  55. ———, ed. 2009. Methods for Matthew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Riches, John, and David C. Sim. 2005. The Gospel of Matthew in Its Roman Imperial Context. London: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
  57. Schwartz, Seth. 2001. Imperialism and Jewish Society: 200 B.C.E. to 640 C.E. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Segovia, Fernando F. 1995. ‘And They Began to Speak in Other Tongues’: Competing Modes of Discourse in Contemporary Biblical Criticism. In Reading from this Place. Volume 1: Social Location and Biblical Interpretation in the United States, ed. Fernando F. Segovia and Mary Ann Tolbert, 1–34. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  59. ———. 2012. Cultural Criticism: Expanding the Scope of Biblical Criticism. In The Future of the Biblical Past: Envisioning Biblical Studies on a Global Key, ed. Roland Boer and Fernando Segovia, 307–336. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Segovia, Fernando F., and R.S. Sugirtharajah, eds. 2009. A Postcolonial Commentary on the New Testament Writings. London: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
  61. Seidman, Steven. 2013. Contested Knowledge: Social Theory Today. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  62. Sheehan, Jonathan. 2007. The Enlightenment Bible: Translation, Scholarship, Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Statius. 2003. Silvae (trans: Schackleton Bailey, D.R.) LCL. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Troeltsch, Ernst. 1913. Uber historiche und dogmatische Methode in der Theologie. In Gesammelte Schriften. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
  65. ———. 1914. Historiography. In Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics, ed. James Hastings, vol. 6, 716–723. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  66. Yarbro Collins, Adela. 2009. Mark’s Interpretation of the Death of Jesus. Journal of Biblical Literature 128 (3): 545–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wongi Park
    • 1
  1. 1.Belmont UniversityNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations