Advertisement

Health Related Benefits of Non-motorised Transport: An Application of the Health Economic Assessment Tool of the World Health Organisation to the Case of Trikala, Greece

  • Pantoleon Skayannis
  • Marios Goudas
  • Diane Crone
  • Nick Cavill
  • Sonja Kahlmeier
  • Vasilena Mitsiadi
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 879)

Abstract

It has been several years now that research coming from various disciplines such as sports science, medicine, urban planning and transport planning has provided strong evidence that sustainable urban mobility (SUM) is not only beneficial to the function of the city but to the human body too. As SUM includes not merely public transport but physical activity (walking, cycling, etc.) and as these can be further combined with exercise, an active urban environment can be created that can contribute to human health. The World Health Organization (WHO) has developed the Health Economic Assessment Tool (HEAT), a software which includes an algorithm designed to estimate the long–term health and economic benefit of a given population’s cycling or walking. This paper shows how the HEAT has been applied to the case of the city of Trikala, Greece. It is based on bicycle traffic measurements recorded on September 2016, in Trikala, in the context of the SPACE Erasmus+ EU Programme. The result shows how and how much the increase of bicycle traffic (distance, hours, frequency of use) in the future can increase life expectancy and reduce health care costs, thus being a beneficial investment. The paper, also includes several ‘what if scenarios’ related to walking, so as to provide a broader picture of a possible urban active environment in the city.

Keywords

Non-motorised transport Health Economic Assessment Tool Trikala Sustainable urban mobility Physical activity 

References

  1. 1.
    Dimitriou, H., Ward, J., Wright, P.: Mega transport projects - Beyond the ‘iron triangle’: findings from the OMEGA research programme. Prog. Plan. 86, 1–43 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Skayannis, P., Goudas, M., Rodakinias, P.: Sustainable mobility and physical activity: a meaningful marriage. Transp. Res. Procedia 24C, 81–88 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM): Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidelines for prescribing exercise. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 43, 1334–1359 (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cavill, N., et al.: Environments for physical activity in Europe. A review of evidence and examples of practice (2016). www.activeenvironments.eu. Accessed 14 Feb 2018
  5. 5.
    Lee, I.M., Shiroma, E.J., Lobelia, F., Puska, P., Blair, S.R., Katzmarzyk, P.T.: Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet 380, 219–229 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Healthknowledge.org (n.d): Measures of disease burden (event-based and time-based) and population attributable risks including identification of comparison groups appropriate for public health. http://www.healthknowledge.org.uk/public-health-textbook/research-methods/1a-epidemiology/measures-disease-burden. Accessed 23 Nov 2016
  7. 7.
    Ding, D., et al.: The Economic burden of physical inactivity: a global analysis of major non-communicable diseases. Lanset 388(10051), 1311–1324 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sallis, J.F., Bull, F., Guthold, R., Heath, G.W., Inoue, S., Kelly, P., Oedema, A.L., Perez, L.G., Richards, J., Hallal, P.: Physical activity 2016: progress and challenges. Progress in physical activity over the Olympic quadrennium. Lancet 388, 1325–1336 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kahlmeier, S., Kelly, P., Foster, C., Götschi, T., Cavill, N., Dinsdale, H., et al.: Health economic assessment tolls (HEAT) for walking and cycling. Methodology and user guide (2014). http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/environment-and-health/Transport-and-health/publications/2011/health-economic-assessment-tools-heat-for-walking-and-for-cycling.-methodology-and-user-guide.-economic-assessment-of-transport-infrastructure-and-policies.-2014-update. Accessed 21 Nov 2016
  10. 10.
    Braki, E.: Light electric vehicles for sustainable urban mobility: the case of Trikala. In: Intelligent Transport Systems Hellas 3rd Conference, 23–24 January 2018Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Public Issue: Η χρήση του ποδηλάτου στην Ελλάδα (2012). Bicycle use in Greece (2012). http://www.publicissue.gr/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/gsi2013001_podilato.pdf. Accessed 20 Sept 2016
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    www.activeenvironments.eu. Accessed 14 Feb 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pantoleon Skayannis
    • 1
  • Marios Goudas
    • 2
  • Diane Crone
    • 3
  • Nick Cavill
    • 4
  • Sonja Kahlmeier
    • 5
  • Vasilena Mitsiadi
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Planning and Regional DevelopmentUniversity of ThessalyVolosGreece
  2. 2.Department of Physical Education and Sport ScienceUniversity of ThessalyTrikalaGreece
  3. 3.University of GloucestershireCheltenhamUK
  4. 4.Cavill AssociatesManchesterUK
  5. 5.University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  6. 6.Municipality of TrikalaTrikalaGreece

Personalised recommendations