Does the Implementation of Urban Freight Transport Policies and Measures Affect Stakeholders’ Behavior?

  • Eftihia Nathanail
  • Giannis AdamosEmail author
  • Ioannis Karakikes
  • Lambros Mitropoulos
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 879)


The aim of this paper is to investigate potential changes in stakeholders’ behavior towards Urban Freight Transport (UFT) policies and measures. In order to capture such behavioral changes, an online questionnaire survey was conducted in 12 European cities, and feedback was received from 292 stakeholders, including supply chain stakeholders, public authorities and other stakeholders. Stakeholders were asked to rate in a scale from 1 to 5, twelve variables, namely: green reputation, diffusion of information, perceived alternative mobility, quality of life, awareness level, green concern, perceived visual and audio nuisance, motivation for eco-driving, compliance with regulations, enforcement, eco-driving practice before the journey and eco-driving practice after the journey. The latter four variables, supplemented by the appropriate statements, were also used for testing the Transtheoretical Model of Change. In this case, supply chain and other stakeholders were asked to choose one of the six stages of the model that mostly represented their attitudes, before and after the implementation of UFT measures in their city. The analysis of results revealed the changes in stakeholders’ knowledge, attitudes, intention and consequently behavior towards UFT policies and measures, and useful conclusions were drawn about the proportion of those stakeholders who have repudiated their previous unsustainable behavior and established the new “desired” behavior.


City logistics Urban freight solutions Stakeholder analysis Behavioral modeling 



This paper has been conducted within the framework of the European Commission’s project NOVELOG (


  1. 1.
    Nathanail, E., Adamos, G., Gogas, M.: A novel framework for assessing sustainable urban logistics. Transp. Res. Procedia 25, 1036–1045 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ajzen, I.: Attitude structure and behaviour. In: Pratkanis, A.R., Breckler, S.J., Greenwald, A.G. (eds.) Attitude Structure and Function, pp. 241–274. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1989)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Triandis, H.C.: Interpersonal Behaviour. Brooks/Cole, Monterey (1977)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Prochaska, J.O., DiClemente, C.C.: Stages and processes of self-change of smoking. Towards an integrative model of change. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 51, 390–395 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boulanger, A., Daniels, S., Delhomme, P., Deugnier, M., Divjak, M., Eyssartier, C., Hels, T., Moan, I., Nathanail, E., Orozova-Bekkevold, I., Ranucci, M-F., Schepers, P., Van den Bossche, F., Zabukovec, V.: Deliverable 2.2 Comparison of research designs, CAST Project (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    NOVELOG: Deliverable D6.2. Behavioural changes towards UFT policies and measures (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Traffic, Transportation and Logistics LaboratoryUniversity of ThessalyVolosGreece

Personalised recommendations