The Implementation of Environmental Friendly City Logistics in South Baltic Region Cities

  • Kinga Kijewska
  • Stanisław IwanEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 879)


The European Council has set the target to reduce European greenhouse gas emissions by 20% till 2020. The negative impacts of urban goods distribution are mainly caused by used vehicles (e.g. diesel-powered) and low system efficiency (e.g. low loading factor, low cooperation). The paper is focused on the introduction of the activities realized under new project – Low Carbon Logistic. It’s realized under the Interreg South Baltic Programme. The major objective of this project is to implement the low carbon city logistics measures in 5 pilot cities as well as to promote and support this kind of activities in South Baltic Region. The aim of the paper is to introduce the assumptions for the activities realized in pilot cities. The planned results will be mostly focused on development of consolidation systems and implementation of alternative fuelled vehicles (EV and cargo-bikes). Also the major elements of LCL approach have been introduced.


City logistics Emissions Assessment 



The paper has been prepared as the activity of the project Low Carbon Logistics, founded under Interreg South Baltic Programme.


  1. 1.
    International Energy Agency, CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion IEA. Statistics Highlights (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    He, K., Huo, H., Zhang, Q., He, D., An, F., Wang, M., Walsh, M.P.: Oil consumption and CO2 emissions in China’s road transport: current status, future trends and policy implications. Energy Policy 33(12), 1499–1507 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cadarso, M.Á., López, L.-A., Gómez, N., Tobarra, M.Á.: CO2 emissions of international freight transport and offshoring, measurement and allocation. Ecol. Econ. 69(8), 1682–1694 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lin, T.-P.: Carbon dioxide emissions from transport in Taiwan’s national parks. Tour. Manag. 31, 285–290 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shahbaz, M., Khraief, N., Jemaa, M.M.B.: On the causal nexus of road transport CO2 emissions and macroeconomic variables in Tunisia: evidence from combined cointegration tests. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 51, 89–100 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Iwan, S., Kijewska, K., Johansen, B.G., Eidhammer, O., Małecki, K., Konicki, W., Thompson, R.G.: Analysis of the environmental impacts of unloading bays based on cellular automata simulation. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. (2017, in press)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kijewska, K., Konicki, W., Iwan, S.: Freight transport pollution propagation at urban areas based on Szczecin example. Transp. Res. Procedia 14, 1543–1552 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Witkowski, J., Kiba-Janiak, M.: Correlation between City Logistics and Quality of Life as an assumption for referential model. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 39, 568–581 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    TURBLOG. Accessed 20 Nov 2017
  10. 10.
    Browne, M., Sweet, M., Woodburn, A., Allen, J.: Urban freight consolidation centres. Final report. University of Westminster (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Low Carbon Logistics. Accessed 10 Feb 2018
  12. 12.
    Russo, F., Comi, A.: Urban freight transport planning towards green goals: synthetic environmental evidence from tested results. Sustainability 8(4), 381 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    C-LIEGE. Accessed 10 Feb 2018
  14. 14.
    GRASS. Accessed 10 Feb 2018
  15. 15.
    STRAIGHSOL. Accessed 10 Feb 2018
  16. 16.
    NOVELOG. Accessed 10 Feb 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and Engineering of TransportMaritime University of SzczecinSzczecinPoland

Personalised recommendations