Advertisement

Conjoint Analysis for the Optimization of a Potential Flexible Transport Service (FTS) in the Region of Zagori, Greece

  • Alexandros Tsoukanelis
  • Evangelos GenitsarisEmail author
  • Dimitrios Nalmpantis
  • Aristotelis Naniopoulos
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 879)

Abstract

Flexible Transport Services (FTSs) are usually recommended as an appropriate solution for the service of travel needs of low demand areas and/or vulnerable people. The flexibility in terms of their design characteristics (e.g. booking procedure, pricing, Level of Service [LoS], etc.) raises the problem of their determination (levels) towards the creation of an optimum future Flexible Transport Services (FTS) (‘product’). By applying the Choice Based Conjoint Analysis (CBCA) deriving from the marketing research discipline, we calculated the ‘utility’ value of the defined levels, the ‘importance’ values of their characteristics and the preferences’ shares for selected alternative scenarios of services. As case study area, we chose the underserved traditional and historic settlements of the mountainous region of Zagori (Zagorochoria) in Greece, close to the city of Ioannina. A field research survey was conducted for the collection of data, both by personal interviews and self-completion online. The analysis of the results is demonstrating a positive acceptance of Flexible Transport Services (FTS) and is indicating travel cost as the most important characteristic.

Keywords

Choice Based Conjoint Analysis Flexible Transport Services (FTS) Demand responsive transport Rural area Mountainous area Zagori 

References

  1. 1.
    Genitsaris, E., Naniopoulos, A., Spanos, G.: Sustainable mobility and flexible transport systems. Investigation of their implementation at Langadas County of Thessaloniki. In: 5th International Congress on Transport Research ICTR2010, Volos, Greece, 27–28 September 2010, pp. 963–982 (2010). [in Greek]Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Halme, M., Kallio, M.: Estimation methods for choice-based conjoint analysis of consumer preferences. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 214(1), 160–167 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.03.049MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Limnios, C., Papagiannakis, A., Genitsaris, E., Naniopoulos, A.: Development of flexible transport service in mountain settlements of Thassos island, Greece. In: 8th International Congress on Transportation Research ICTR2017, Thessaloniki, Greece, 27–29 September 2017 (2017). [in Greek]Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lohrke, F.T., Holloway, B.B., Woolley, T.W.: Conjoint analysis in entrepreneurship research: a review and research agenda. Organ. Res. Methods 13(1), 16–30 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428109341992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Naniopoulos, A., Genitsaris, E., Tsitakis, D., Balampekou, I., Spanos, G.: Feasibility study of the Langadas area. FLIPPER Project (Interreg IVC), Thessaloniki, Greece (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Naniopoulos, A., Tsalis, P., Savvidis, I., Genitsaris, E.: Accessibility and usage of mainstream and special transport services in the city of Thessaloniki Greece. In: 13th International Conference on Mobility and Transport for Elderly and Disabled Persons TRANSED2012, New Delhi, India, 17–21 September 2012 (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations