Analysis of Mobility Patterns in Selected University Campus Areas

  • Eleni VlahogianniEmail author
  • Panagiotis Papantoniou
  • George Yannis
  • Maria Attard
  • Alberto Regattieri
  • Francesco Piana
  • Francesco Pilati
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 879)


The objective of the present research is to better understand mobility in university campus areas, using local and transnational data, policies and planning instruments. This analysis looks at integrating student’s mobility flows to/from and inside Campus areas with urban mobility. Within this framework, a survey was developed for seven Southern European universities including a mobility questionnaire on current mobility, desired mobility, mobility problems, proposed measures/policies/tools as well as demographic characteristics of the participants which were mainly undergraduate students, post graduate students, academic/faculty members and administrative staff. For the purpose of the survey, 1,090 questionnaires were collected and further analyse. Regarding the mobility to/from the city, campuses are further distinguished into those that are inside and outside the city. Results highlight differences in the policies that are most critical based on the location of each University. More specifically, for campuses located inside urban area, the most important transport measures include public transport and environmental issues. On the other hand, for mobility in campuses located outside urban areas, results indicate that measures should address public transport and road infrastructure, to help accessibility to and from the campus areas.


University campus Sustainable urban mobility plan Policies Mobility measures Tools 



This paper is based on “CAMPus sustainable University mobility plans in MED areas” research project under the Interreg Med program, co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund.


  1. 1.
    Wefering, F., Rupprecht, S., Bührmann, S., Böhler-Baedeker, S.: Guidelines. developing and implementing a sustainable urban mobility plan. In: European Platform on Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans, European Commission (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tolley, R.: Green campuses: cutting the environmental cost of commuting. J. Transp. Geogr. 4(3), 213–217 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Balsas, C.: Sustainable transportation planning on college campuses. Transp. Policy 10, 35–49 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Miralles-Guasch, C., Domene, E.: Sustainable transport challenges in a suburban university: the case of the Autonomous University of Barcelona. Transp. Policy 17, 454–463 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lah, O., Shrestha, S., Hüging, H., Decker, B., Gyergyay, B., Marhold, K., Mendez, G., Boile, M., Sdoukopoulos, E., Kressler, F., Rizet. C., Dablanc, L.: Transferability of sustainable urban transport solutions. CODATU2015 Conference, Istanbul, Turkey (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tsirimpa, A., Gkotsis, I., Kepaptsoglou, K., Vlahogianni, E., Polydoropoulou A., Karlaftis, M.G.: Policies for enhancing mobility in academic campuses: the case of CERN. In: International Conferences Presented to the 7th Conference on Transport Research (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Silva, J., Ferreira, D.: European best practice on sustainable mobility in university campus, T.aT. - Students Today, Citizens Tomorrow, Report (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    MOST project.: Mobility management strategies for the next decades, Final Report (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lajunen, T., Ozkan T.B.: Porter’s Handbook of traffic psychology, Chapter 4 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grosvenor, T.: Qualitative research in the transport sector. resource paper for the workshop on qualitative/quantitative methods. In: Proceedings of an International Conference on Transport Survey Quality and Innovation. Transportation Research E-Circular (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gamberi, M., Bortolini, M., Pilati, F., Regattieri, A.: Multi-objective optimizer for multimodal distribution networks: carbon footprint and delivery time. In: Using Decision Support Systems for Transportation Planning Efficiency, p. 330 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eleni Vlahogianni
    • 1
    Email author
  • Panagiotis Papantoniou
    • 1
  • George Yannis
    • 1
  • Maria Attard
    • 2
  • Alberto Regattieri
    • 3
  • Francesco Piana
    • 3
  • Francesco Pilati
    • 3
  1. 1.National Technical University of AthensAthensGreece
  2. 2.University of MaltaMsidaMalta
  3. 3.University of BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations