Advertisement

Development of a Methodology, Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), to Choose Between Full Pedestrianization and Traffic Calming Area (Woonerf Zone Type)

  • Ioannis Vasileiadis
  • Dimitrios NalmpantisEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 879)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is the development of selection criteria, as well as a respective selection methodology, between full pedestrianization and the reconstruction of an area to a woonerf type traffic calming zone. The criteria which characterize a pedestrian area as such and a woonerf type traffic calming zone as such were collected. The processing of the criteria followed as well as their comparison. The criteria based evaluation of the alternatives may lead to a decision in case they do not meet one of the alternatives. Otherwise, e.g. in case the criteria meet both the alternatives, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method may be used for the selection of the best solution. This main idea led to the development of a methodology that is presented in this paper. Initially, a theoretical approach to the problem took place and 22 AHP questionnaires were completed by engineers of various disciplines regarding the problem, in order to draw general conclusions regarding the importance of the selected criteria. In order to test the proposed methodology in a specific case, it was applied in a case study at the Municipality of Ampelokipoi-Menemeni, Greece, where 11 AHP questionnaires were completed by residents and shopkeepers of the examined area. The results show that the proposed methodology could be a valid solution to a contemporary problem that many local authorities face.

Keywords

Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Pedestrianization Woonerf 

References

  1. 1.
    Aravantinos, A.: Urban planning: for a sustainable development of urban space. Symmetry, Athens, Greece (2007). [in Greek]Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    New Building Regulation, Law 4067/2012 (Government Gazette of the Hellenic Republic 79/Α΄/09-04-2012) (2012). [in Greek]Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Road Traffic Code, Law 2696/1999 (Government Gazette of the Hellenic Republic 57/Α΄/23-03-1999) (1999). [in Greek]Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hellenic Ministry of Environment and Climate Change: Decision 63234/19-12-2012 for the adoption of the Technical Implementation Guidelines Annex of the Law 4067/2012 (2012). [in Greek]Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nalmpantis, D., Lampou, S.C., Naniopoulos, A.: The concept of woonerf zone applied in university campuses: the case of the campus of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. Transp. Res. Procedia 24, 450–458 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kjemtrup, K., Herrstedt, L.: Speed management and traffic calming in urban areas in Europe: a historical view. Accid. Anal. Prev. 24(1), 57–65 (1992).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(92)90072-QCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stillings, T., Lockwood, I.: West Palm Beach traffic calming: the second generation. Transp. Res. Circ. E-C019(I-5), 1–22 (2000). http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/circulars/ec019/Ec019_i5.pdf
  8. 8.
    Collarte, N.: The woonerf concept: “Rethinking a residential street in Somerville”. Tufts University, Cambridge, MA (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zacharaki, E., Pitsiava-Latinopoulou, M.: A strategy for the implementation of traffic calming schemes. Trasporti Europei 22, 22–27 (2002). http://hdl.handle.net/10077/8462Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Macharis, C., Bernardini, A.: Reviewing the use of multi-criteria analysis for the evaluation of transport projects: time for a multi-actor approach. Transp. Policy 37, 177–186 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.11.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY (1980)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Saaty, T.L.: A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J. Math. Psychol. 15(3), 234–281 (1977).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Saaty, T.L.: How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 48(1), 9–26 (1990).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-IMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hellenic Open UniversityPatrasGreece
  2. 2.Aristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations