Problems, Risks and Prospects of Ecological Safety’s Increase While Transition to Green Transport

  • Irina Makarova
  • Ksenia ShubenkovaEmail author
  • Vadim Mavrin
  • Larisa Gabsalikhova
  • Gulnaz Sadygova
  • Timur Bakibayev
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 879)


Improving the efficiency and environmental friendliness of transport is one of the main directions of transition to a low-carbon economy. The conducted researchers have shown that to implement the concept of transition to sustainable “green” transport, it is necessary to improve management in all subsystems of the transport system. Some of these ways are (1) the improvement of vehicles’ fleet management, such as the use of low-carbon, energy-efficient vehicles, timely fleet renewal, (2) optimization of the route network, road infrastructure and (3) the full use of vehicles’ capacity. We have built an original simulation models of the road network’s sections. As the input data we have used the data received from the field observations of traffic flows. Optimization experiment allowed us to determine optimal parameters of traffic flow, configuration of the route network and road infrastructure.


Green transport Environmental safety Risk Environmental standard Simulation model 



Research is partially funded by national grant No. BR05236644.


  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    State report “About the state and protection of the environment of the Russian Federation in 2016”.
  3. 3.
    Makarova, I., et al.: Intelligent transportation systems – problems and perspectives. Stud. Syst. Decis. Control. 32, 37–80 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reich, A.: Transportation efficiency. Strat. Plan. Energy Environ. 32(2), 32–43 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Petrović, J., et al.: Possibilities of buses on alternative fuel in public urban transport in Belgrade. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 15(1), 78–89 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kholod, N., Evans, M.: Reducing black carbon emissions from diesel vehicles in Russia: an assessment and policy recommendations. Environ. Sci. Policy 56, 1–8 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bond, T., et al.: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: a scientific assessment. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 118(11), 5380–5552 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gabsalikhova, L., et al.: The prospects of use of alternative types of fuel in road transport. J. Fundam. Appl. Sci. 9(2S), 869–879 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ally, J., Pryor, T.: Life cycle costing of diesel, natural gas, hybrid and hydrogen fuel cell bus systems: an Australian case study. Energy Policy 94, 285–294 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Poullikkas, A.: Sustainable options for electric vehicle technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 41, 1277–1287 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Frost & Sullivan: Strategic analysis of global hybrid and electric heavy-duty transit bus market (2013). Accessed 20 Jan 2018
  12. 12.
    Kuznetsov, E.S.: Upravlenie tekhnicheskimi sistemami (Management of technical systems). MADI, Moscow (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Khan, M.I., Yasmin, T., Shakoor, A.: Technical overview of compressed natural gas (CNG) as a transportation fuel. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 51, 785–797 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Makarova, I., et al.: Transition to «green» economy in Russia: current and long-term challenges. J. Appl. Eng. Sci. 13(1), 1–10 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    State Traffic Safety Inspectorate.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kazan Federal UniversityNaberezhnye ChelnyRussian Federation
  2. 2.Almaty Management UniversityAlmatyRepublic of Kazakhstan

Personalised recommendations