Advertisement

In Pursuit of the Noble: The Classical Birth of the Liberal Arts

  • Alexander S. Rosenthal-Pubul
Chapter

Abstract

The most popular critique of the liberal arts in general and philosophy in particular is that they are “useless” and fail to produce marketable skills. This contention was already dealt with by Aristotle who flatly denied that “utility” is the highest form of good. On the contrary useful goods, are “good” only in relation to something else, and so are inherently secondary and subordinate to what is good in itself – “the noble.” From this distinction between the “noble” and the “useful” arose the corresponding classical distinction and the liberal arts and the mechanical arts. For Seneca the liberal arts are those which befit the gentleman, who being “free” from necessary labor had leisure to pursue arts which have their own proper excellence - as poetry, rhetoric, and philosophy. Arts concerned with commerce, industry, and labor for practical and material gains were subordinated by the classics as merely useful, “mechanical” arts. This educational tradition of the liberal arts has exercised a vast influence on Western civilization long outlasting the classical world itself. While this distinction is indubitably connected with the Greco-Roman class structure, it also reflected a deeper humanist truth. As the intellectual and moral faculties are what is best and noblest in man, so their cultivation brings about the full stature of human dignity.

References

  1. Alberti, Leon Battista. On Painting (De Pictura). At Noteaccess.com. http://www.noteaccess.com/Texts/Alberti/index.htm. Accessed May 2018.
  2. Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. 1926. (1999 reprint). Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. H. Rackham, 1999. Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. ———. Metaphysics 1933 (2003 reprint). Trans. Hugh Tredennick. Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Aristophanes. Clouds. In Perseus. http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Aristoph.%20Cl.%20153&lang=original. Accessed 25 Apr 2018.
  5. BBC. 2016. The Muses. In Our Time. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b07bft7v. Accessed May 2018.
  6. Capella, Martianus. 1836. De Nuptiis Philologiae, et Mercurii. Francofurti ad Moenum Varentrapp. At Archive.org. https://archive.org/details/denuptiisphilolo00martuoft. Accessed May 2018.
  7. Cicero. Pro Archia Poeta. In Forum Romanum. http://www.forumromanum.org/literature/cicero/arche.html#16. Accessed 29 Apr 2018.
  8. Dawson, Christopher. 2010 (reprint). The Crisis of Western Education. Washington, DC: CUA Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gellius, Aulus. Noctes Atticae. Transcribed from Loeb 1927 (revised 1946). http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Gellius/1*.html. Accessed 5 May 2018.
  10. Hugh of St. Victor. Erudutionis Didascalicae. Libri Septem. (Liber Secundus. XXI). In Documenta Catholica. http://www.documentacatholicaomnia.eu/02m/1096- 1141,_Hugo_De_S_Victore,_Eruditionis_Didascalicae_Libri_Septem,_MLT.pdf – from Migne Patrologia. Accessed 4 May 2017.
  11. Jaeger, Werner. 1962. Aristotle: Fundamentals of the History of His Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Johnston, H. 1967. Liberal Education. In The New Catholic Encyclopedia, vol. 8. Washington, DC: CUA Press.Google Scholar
  13. Nightingale, A.W. 2004. Spectacles of Truth in Classical Greek Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Plato. 1930 (1999 reprint.) Republic. 1-5. Trans. Paul Shorey. Ed. Jeffrey Henderson. Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 1936 (2006 reprint). Republic.6-10. Trans. Paul Shorey. Ed. Jeffrey Henderson. Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Quintillian. 2001. Institutio Oratoria/The Orator’s Education. Books 9-10. Trans. Donald Russell. Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Sadoleto, Jacopo. 1916 translation. (Nabu reprint.) Sadoleto on Education. A Translation of the De Pueris Recte Instituendis Trans. Ernest Trafford Campagnac (translator.) Oxford University Press, 1916 – Nabu reprint.Google Scholar
  18. Seneca, Lucius Annaeus. Moral Essays. Trans. John W. Bassore. 1932 (2001 reprint). Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. ———. Epistularum Moralem ad Lucillium LXXXVIII (88) At the Latin Library. http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/sen/seneca.ep11-13.shtml. Accessed 5 May 2018.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander S. Rosenthal-Pubul
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Advanced Governmental StudiesJohns Hopkins UniversityWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations