Advertisement

Concluding Thoughts

  • Hanna Lempinen
Chapter

Abstract

In the concluding chapter of the book, Lempinen highlights the problematic ways in which energy and its social sustainability are understood in Arctic sustainability science. While consumption concerns, regional energy security, and renewable energy alternatives are inserting themselves into the regional energy agenda, energy is still framed first and foremost as driving sustainable regional development. Here, the author highlights how constructing energy as an independent “driver” places energy more in the realms of natural science and technology than in the realms of societal discussion and debate. The conclusions also draw attention to the “regionalized” articulations of sustainability that are characteristic of the assessments and reports, largely reduced to mediating social impacts within the Arctic region, and with scant attention to the global implications of regional energy development.

Keywords

Arctic energy Climate change Fossil sustainabilities Regional development Social sustainability 

References

  1. AES. 2013. Richness, Resilience, Responsibility: 2013 Arctic Energy Summit Executive Summary. Anchorage: Institute of the North.Google Scholar
  2. AHDR. 2015. Arctic Human Development Report II: Regional Processes and Global Linkages. Akureyri: Stefansson Arctic Institute.Google Scholar
  3. AMAP. 2010. Arctic Oil and Gas Activities: Effects and Potential Effects. Oslo, Norway: Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme.Google Scholar
  4. ARR. 2016. Arctic Resilience Report. http://hdl.handle.net/11374/1838. Accessed 19 Feb 2018.
  5. Bertelsen, Rasmus Gjedssø, Jens Christian Justinussen, and Coco Smits. 2015. Energy as a developmental strategy: Creating knowledge-based energy sectors in Iceland, the Faroe Islands and Greenland. In Handbook of the Politics of the Arctic, ed. Leif Christian Jensen and Geir Hønneland, 3–25. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, Scott. 1996. Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. Journal of the American Planning Association 62 (3): 296–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chester, Lynne. 2010. Conceptualising energy security and making explicit its polysemic nature. Energy Policy 38 (2): 887–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clarke, Adele E. 2005. Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory After the Postmodern Turn. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Coates, Ken, and Carin Holroyd. 2017. Non-Arctic states and their stake in Arctic sustainability. In Governing Arctic Change: Global Perspectives, ed. Kathrin Keil and Sebastian Knecht, 207–228. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dale, Bright. 2016. Governing resources, governing mentalities: Petroleum and the Norwegian integrated ecosystem-based management plan for the Barents and Lofoten Seas in 2011. The Extractive Industries and Society 3: 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Desbiens, Caroline. 2013. Power from the North: Territory, Identity, and the Culture of Hydroelectricity in Quebec. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
  12. Di Muzio, Tim. 2016. Critical theory, the open range and the illusion of the epoch. In Energy, Capitalism and World Order: Toward a New Agenda in International Political Economy, ed. Tim Di Muzio and Jesse Salah Ovadia, 201–217. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Di Muzio, Tim, and Jesse Salah Ovadia. 2016. Energy, capitalism and world order in IPE. In Energy, Capitalism and World Order. Toward a New Agenda in International Political Economy, ed. Tim Di Muzio and Jesse Salah Ovadia, 1–19. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. ECONOR. 2015. The Economy of the North III, ed. Solveig Glomsrød, Gerald Duhaime, and Iulie Aslaksen. Oslo: Statistics Norway.Google Scholar
  15. Favennec, Jean-Pierre. 2011. The Geopolitics of Energy. Paris: Editions Technip.Google Scholar
  16. Forbis, Robert Jr., and Katharine Hayhoe. 2018. Does Arctic governance hold the key to achieving climate policy targets? Environmental Research Letters 13 (2): 1–4.Google Scholar
  17. Hoogensen Gjørv, Gunhild. 2017. Tensions between environmental, economic and energy security in the Arctic. In Northern Sustainabilities: Understanding and Addressing Change in the Circumpolar World, ed. Gail Fondahl and Gary N. Wilson, 35–46. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. Humrich, Cristoph. 2017. Sustainable development in Arctic international environmental cooperation and the governance of hydrocarbon-related activities. In Governance of Arctic Offshore Oil and Gas, ed. Cécile Pelaudeix and Ellen Margrethe Basse, 31–46. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. IEA. 2015. Energy and Climate Change: World Energy Outlook Special Report. https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/WEO2015SpecialReportonEnergyandClimateChange.pdf. Accessed 27 Sept 2016.
  20. Jacobsen, Rikke B., and Alyne E. Delaney. 2014. When social sustainability becomes politics: Perspectives from Greenlandic fisheries governance. Maritime Studies 13 (6): 1–14.Google Scholar
  21. Keil, Kathrin, and Sebastian Knecht. 2017. The Arctic as a globally embedded space. In Governing Arctic Change: Global Perspectives, ed. Kathrin Keil and Sebastian Knecht, 1–18. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kristoferssen, Berit, and Oluf Langhelle. 2017. Sustainable development as a global-Arctic matter: Imaginaries and controversies. In Governing Arctic Change: Global Perspectives, ed. Kathrin Keil and Sebastian Knecht, 21–41. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kuzemko, Caroline. 2016. Energy depoliticisation in the UK: Destroying political capacity. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 18 (1): 107–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Law, John, and John Urry. 2004. Enacting the social. Economy and Society 33 (3): 390–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lempinen, Hanna, and Dorothée Cambou. 2018. Societal perspectives on energy security in the Barents region. In Societal Security in the Arctic-Barents Region: Environmental Sustainability and Human Security, ed. Kamrul Hossain and Dorothée Cambou, 118–133. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. McCarthy, James. 2015. A socioecological fix to capitalist crisis and climate change? The possibilities and limits of renewable energy. Journal of Environment and Planning A 47: 2485–2502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mitchell, Timothy. 2009. Carbon democracy. Economy and Society 38 (3): 399–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Newnham, Randall. 2011. Oil, carrots and sticks: Russia’s energy resources as a foreign policy tool. Journal of Eurasian Studies 2 (2): 134–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Norgaard, Kari Marie. 2011. Living in Denial: Climate Change, Emotions and Everyday Life. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. Petrov, Andrey N., F. Shauna BurnSilver, I.I.I. Stuart Chapin, Gail Fondahl, Jessica K. Graybill, Kathrin Keil, Annika E. Nilsson, Rudolf Riedlsperger, and Peter Schweitzer. 2017. Arctic Sustainability Research: Past, Present and Future. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pram Gad, Ulrik, and Jeppe Strandsbjerg (ed.). 2018. The Politics of Sustainability in the Arctic: Reconfiguring Identity, Time, and Space, forthcoming. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Sidortsov, Roman. 2016. A perfect moment during imperfect times: Arctic energy research in a low-carbon era. Energy Research & Social Science 16: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sidortsov, Roman, and Benjamin Sovacool. 2015. Left out in the cold: Energy justice and Arctic energy research. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 5 (3): 302–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sinevaara-Niskanen, Heidi. 2015. Setting the stage for Arctic development: Politics of knowledge and the power of presence. Rovaniemi: Lapland University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Sovacool, Benjamin K. 2014. What are we doing here? Analyzing fifteen years of energy scholarship and proposing a social science research agenda. Energy Research & Social Science 1: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stammler, Florian, and Emma Wilson. 2016. Beyond extractivism and alternative cosmologies: Arctic communities and extractive industries in uncertain times. The Extractive Industries and Society 3: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stirling, Andy. 2014. Transforming power: Social science and the politics of energy choices. Energy Research & Social Science 1: 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Strauss, Hannah. 2011. For the Good of Society: Public Participation in the Siting of Nuclear and Hydro Power Projects in Finland. Tampere: Juvenes Print.Google Scholar
  39. Sussex, Matthew, and Robert E. Kanet (eds.). 2015. Russia, Eurasia and the New Geopolitics of Energy: Confrontation and Consolidation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  40. Tynkkynen, Veli-Pekka. 2010. From mute to reflective: Changing governmentality in St Petersburg and the priorities of Russian environmental planning. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 53 (2): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tynkkynen, Veli-Pekka. 2016. Energy as power: Gazprom, gas infrastructure and geo-governmentality in Putin’s Russia. Slavic Review 75 (2): 374–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tynkkynen, Veli-Pekka, and Nina Tynkkynen. 2018. Climate denial revisited: (Re)Contextualising Russian public discourse on climate change during Putin 2.0. Europe–Asia Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2018.1472218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hanna Lempinen
    • 1
  1. 1.Aleksanteri InstituteUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations