Advertisement

Impulsive Control Problems Under the Frobenius Condition

  • Aram Arutyunov
  • Dmitry KaramzinEmail author
  • Fernando Lobo Pereira
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences book series (LNCIS, volume 477)

Abstract

In this chapter, the matrix-multiplier G for the impulsive control is enriched with a dependence on the state variable x. This naturally leads to some ambiguity in the choice of the state trajectory, since it is assumed that the state trajectory may exhibit jumps. Therefore, generally speaking, different types of integral w.r.t. measure will lead us to different solution concepts. Herein, we have settled on the type of integration which implies the stability of the solution w.r.t. approximations by absolutely continuous measures. The uniqueness and stability of the solution in this case are guaranteed by the well-known Frobenius condition. The extension of the original problem is treated w.r.t. this type of solution which is stable in the weak-* topology. The main result of this chapter is the second-order necessary conditions of optimality without a priori assumptions of normality, which are obtained under the assumption that the Frobenius condition for the columns of matrix G is satisfied. The chapter ends with 11 exercises.

References

  1. 1.
    Agrachev, A., Gamkrelidze, R.: Index of extremality and quasiextremality. Russian Math. Doklady 284, 11–14 (1985)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Agrachev, A., Gamkrelidze, R.: Quasi-extremality for control systems. J. Sov. Math. 55(4), 1849–1864 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arutyunov, A.: Perturbations of extremal problems with constraints and necessary optimality conditions. J. Sov. Math. 54(6), 1342–1400 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arutyunov, A.: Second-order conditions in extremal problems. The abnormal points. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 350(11), 4341–4365 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arutyunov, A.: Necessary conditions for an extremum and an inverse function theorem without a priori normality assumptions. Tr. Mat. Inst. Steklova 236 (Differ. Uravn. i Din. Sist.), 33–44 (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Arutyunov, A.: Smooth abnormal problems in extremum theory and analysis. Russ. Math. Surv. 67(3), 403–457 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arutyunov, A., Dykhta, V., Pereira, F.: Necessary conditions for impulsive nonlinear optimal control problems without a priori normality assumptions. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 124(1), 55–77 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Arutyunov, A., Jacimovic, V., Pereira, F.: Second order necessary conditions for optimal impulsive control problems. J. Dyn. Control Syst. 9(1), 131–153 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Arutyunov, A., Karamzin, D.: Necessary conditions for a weak minimum in an optimal control problem with mixed constraints. Differ. Equ. 41(11), 1532–1543 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Arutyunov, A., Vereshchagina, Y.: On necessary second-order conditions in optimal control problems. Differ. Equ. 38(11), 1531–1540 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Arutyunov, A.V.: Optimality conditions. Abnormal and degenerate problems. In: Mathematics and its Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cartan, H.: Differential Forms. Dover Books on Mathematics. Dover Publications (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dykhta, V.: The variational maximum principle and second-order optimality conditions for impulse processes and singular processes. Sib. Math. J. 35(1), 65–76 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dykhta, V., Samsonyuk, O.: Optimal Impulse Control with Applications. Fizmatlit, Moscow (2000) (in Russian)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gamkrelidze, R.: Principles of Optimal Control Theory. Plenum Press, New York (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hartman, P.: Ordinary Differential Equations, 2nd edn. Classics in Applied Mathematics. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, USA (1982)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hille, E., Phillips, R.: Functional Analysis and Semi Groups. Colloquium Publications, American Mathematical Society (1957)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Karamzin, D.: Necessary conditions of the minimum in an impulse optimal control problem. J. Math. Sci. 139(6), 7087–7150 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Krasnosel’skij, M., Pokrovskij, A.: Systems with Hysteresis. Trans. from the Russian by Marek Niezgódka. Springer, Berlin etc. (1989)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Milyutin, A., Osmolovskii, N.: Calculus of variations and Optimal Control. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sarychev, A.: Optimization of generalized (impulse) controls in a nonlinear time-optimal problem. Diff. Equ. 27(5), 539–550 (1991)zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aram Arutyunov
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Dmitry Karamzin
    • 4
    Email author
  • Fernando Lobo Pereira
    • 5
  1. 1.Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Institute of Control Sciences of the Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  3. 3.RUDN UniversityMoscowRussia
  4. 4.Federal Research Center “Computer Science and Control” of the Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  5. 5.FEUP/DEECPorto UniversityPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations