Evaluation of Machining Defects in a Composite Laminate by Combining Non-destructive and Tensile Testing

  • Louis-Alexandre Généreux
  • Gilbert Lebrun
  • Martin ViensEmail author
  • Jean-François Chatelain
Part of the Advanced Structured Materials book series (STRUCTMAT, volume 98)


Although composite structures can be molded to nearly final shape, they generally require different finishing operations, such as drilling and trimming, to meet dimensional tolerances and enable assembly. Conventional drilling and trimming methods tend to induce internal damage to the composite, mainly in the form of edge delamination, matrix thermal degradation, fiber fracture or fiber pullout. As the damage mechanisms and progression are not yet fully understood, it is crucial that the appropriate tools be used to verify the structural integrity of composite parts. NDT techniques allow observing the extent of damage in composites; however they have limited resolution for shallow edge defects. On the other hand, well-designed tensile tests, made from coupons taken over extra materials intentionally left around a part, are sensitive to the reduction of mechanical properties of trimmed composite samples due to, among others, thermal degradation and smearing of the matrix. In that respect, the main objective of this work is to evaluate the possibility to detect and quantify small edge machining damage using the ultrasonic testing (UT) method and combine this approach with mechanical testing to determine the influence of machining on the quality of trimmed parts. Indeed, a combination of mechanical testing and NDT techniques could provide an interesting avenue to appropriately certify the quality of a machined composite part. A non-destructive testing (NDT) method and tensile mechanical testing will thus be used to characterize the extent and the influence of damage induced by the trimming operation of quasi-isotropic carbon/epoxy composites. First, the resolution and the precision of ultrasonic testing (UT) are evaluated with composite samples comprising internal (artificial) defects. Next, this method is used to evaluate machined samples prepared by using high performance machining tools for composites. It is shown that the UT technique is able to detect the very small edge defects induced by trimming. Then, mechanical testing of narrow tensile coupons is performed to compare impact of milling, abrasive cutting and sanding on the quality of trimmed surfaces. Results suggest that some type of damage could efficiently be quantified when coupons of reduced width is used to magnify the influence of defects on the measured strength.


Polymer matrix composites (PMCs) Machining Non-destructive testing Mechanical testing 



Thanks to the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), NanoQuébec and MITACS for their financial support. This work was also funded by the Consortium for Research and Innovation in Aerospace in Québec (CRIAQ) and its partners, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), MITACS, Bombardier Aerospace, Avior Integrated Products, Delastek and AV&R Vision & Robotics.


  1. 1.
    Fahr, A.: Ultrasonic C-scan inspection of composite materials. Eng. J. Q. Univ. 5, 201–222 (1992)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baker, A., Dutton, S., Kelly, D.: Composite Materials for Aircraft Structures, 2nd edn, pp. 403–433. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Scarponi, C., Briotti, G.: Ultrasonic detection of delaminations on composite materials. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 16, 768–790 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Adams, R.D., Cawley, P.: A review of defect types and nondestructive testing techniques for composites and bonded joints. NDT Int. 21, 208–222 (1988)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ahmad, J.: Machining of Polymer Composites. Springer, Boston, MA (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ramulu, M.: Machining and surface integrity of fibre-reinforced plastic composites. Sadhana Acad. Proc. Eng. Sci. 22, 449–472 (1997)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang, D.H., Ramulu, M., Arola, D.: Orthogonal cutting mechanisms of graphite/epoxy composite. Part I: unidirectional laminate. Int. J. Mach. Tools. Manuf. 35, 1623–1638 (1995)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang, D.H., Ramulu, M., Arola, D.: Orthogonal cutting mechanisms of graphite/epoxy composite. Part II: multi-directional laminate. Int. J. Mach. Tools. Manuf. 35, 1639–1648 (1995)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bhatnagar, N., Nayak, D., Singh, I., Chouhan, H., Mahajan, P.: Determination of machining-induced damage characteristics of fiber reinforced plastic composite laminates. Mater. Manuf. Processes 19, 1009–1023 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Colligan, K., Ramulu, M.: Delamination in surface plies of graphite/epoxy caused by edge trimming process. In: Srivatsan, T.S., Chandrashekhar, S. (eds.) Processing and Manufacturing of Composite Materials. ASME Prod. Eng. Div. 49, 113–126 (1991)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guegan, P., Lemaitre, F., Hamann, J.: Contribution à l’usinage des matériaux composites. Ifremer 1080, 470–479 (1992)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sadat, A.B.: Delamination and other types of damage of graphite/epoxy composite caused by machining. ASME Appl. Mech. Div. 208, 41–52 (1995)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sendeckyj, G.P.: Effects of defects in composite structures. In: Noor, A.K., Shuart, M.J., Starnes Jr., J.H., Williams, J.G. (eds.) Failure Analysis and Mechanisms of Failure of Fibrous Composite Structures. NASA Conf. Pub. 2278, 305–312 (1983)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ghidossi, P., El Mansori, M., Pierron, F.: Edge machining effects on the failure of polymer matrix composite coupons. Compos. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 35, 989–999 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Avdelidis, N.P., Almond, D.P., Dobbinson, A., Hawtin, B.C., Ibarra-Castanedo, C., Maldague, X.: Aircraft composites assessment by means of transient thermal NDT. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 40, 143–162 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tsao, C.C., Hocheng, H.: Taguchi analysis of delamination associated with various drill bits in drilling of composite material. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 44, 1085–1090 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Howarth, S.G., Strong, A.B.: Edge effects with waterjet and laser beam cutting of advanced composite materials. In: Janicki, G., Bailey, V., Schjelderup, H. (eds.) Advanced Materials—The Challenge for the Next Decade. Natl. SAMPE Symp. Exhib. Proc. 35, 1684–1697 (1990)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ghidossi, P., Mansori, M.E., Pierron, F.: Influence of specimen preparation by machining on the failure of polymer matrix off-axis tensile coupons. Compos. Sci. Technol. 66, 1857–1872 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ramulu, M., Arola, D., Colligan, K.: Preliminary investigation of machining effects on the surface integrity of fiber reinforced plastics. In: Faghri, A., Yaghoubi, M.A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd Biennial European Joint Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis. ASME Petro. Div. 64, 93–101 (1994)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Arola, D., Ramulu, M.: Machining-induced surface texture effects on the flexural properties of a graphite/epoxy laminate. Composites 25, 822–834 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Arola, D., Ramulu, M.: Net-shape machining and the process-dependent failure of fiber-reinforced plastics under static loads. J. Compos. Technol. Res. 20, 210–220 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Arola, D., Ramulu, M.: Net shape manufacturing and the performance of polymer composites under dynamic loads. Exp. Mech. 37, 379–385 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Arola, D., Ramulu, M.: An examination of the effects from surface texture on the strength of fiber reinforced plastics. J. Compos. Mater. 33, 102–123 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Arola, D., Williams, C.L.: Surface texture, fatigue, and the reduction in stiffness of fiber reinforced plastics. J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 124, 160–166 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zaghbani, I., Chatelain, J.F., Songmene, V., Bérubé, S., Atarsia, A.: A comprehensive analysis of cutting forces during routing of multilayer carbon fiber-reinforced polymer laminates. J. Compos. Mater. 46, 1955–1971 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    O’Higgins, R.M., McCarthy, M.A., McCarthy, C.T.: Comparison of open hole tension characteristics of high strength glass and carbon fibre-reinforced composite materials. Compos. Sci. Technol. 68, 2770–2778 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Aymerich, F., Found, M.S.: Response of notched carbon/PEEK and carbon/epoxy laminates subjected to tension fatigue loading. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 23, 675–683 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Louis-Alexandre Généreux
    • 1
  • Gilbert Lebrun
    • 2
  • Martin Viens
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jean-François Chatelain
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringÉcole de technologie supérieureMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières (UQTR)Trois-RivièresCanada

Personalised recommendations