Advertisement

Holonovel: Perspective on Enactive Narrative Intelligence

  • Jelena Rosic
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 532)

Abstract

The paper outlines conceptual framework for Holonovel as an intelligent system that operates on the basis of narrative interaction. Under the idea of interactive interface that assumes narrative as a sense-making tool, embodied and situated aspects of engagement with the world are discussed. Theoretical framework based on enactive model of perception and cognition here underlines features of human-level narrative comprehension on which computational models of narrative can draw in their designs.

Keywords

Human-centered design HCI Enactivism Narrative intelligence Computational narrative 

References

  1. 1.
    R.A. Brooks, Intelligence without reason. Artif. Intell. Crit. Concepts 3, 107–163 (1991)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Coles, K. Dautenhahn, A robotic story-teller, in Proc. SIRS2000, 8th Symposium on Intelligent Robotic Systems, the University of Reading, England, (University of Reading, Reading, 2000), pp. 18–20Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Mateas, P. Sengers (eds.), Narrative intelligence. Adv. Conscious. Res. 46, 342 (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Stewart et al. (2010), in T. Froese, Bio-machine hybrid technology: A theoretical assessment and some suggestions for improved future design, Phil. Technol. 27(4), 539–560 (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M.O. Riedl, Computational narrative intelligence: A human-centered goal for artificial intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.06484 (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M.-L. Ryan, Narrative as Virtual Reality: Immersion and Interactivity in Literature and Electronic Media (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Poulaki, Neurocinematics and the discourse of control: Towards a critical neurofilmology. Ciné. Cie Int. Film Stud. J. 22–23 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Rosch, L. Thompson, J.V. Francisco, The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1991), p. 173Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Stewart et al. (eds.), Enaction: Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science (MIT Press, Cambridge, 2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. McGann, Perceptual modalities: Modes of presentation or modes of interaction? J. Conscious. Stud. 17(1–2), 72–94 (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    C.L. Nehaniv, Narrative for artifacts: Transcending context and self, in Narrative Intelligence: Papers from the 1999 AAAI Fall Symposium FS-99-01, (AAAI, Menlo Park, 1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M.O. Riedl, R.M. Young, Narrative planning: Balancing plot and character. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 39, 217–268 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Y.B. Popova, Narrativity and enaction: The social nature of literary narrative understanding. Front. Psychol. 5, 895 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. De Jaegher, E. Di Paolo, Participatory sense-making. Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci. 6(4), 485–507 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. Carney, R. Wlodarski, R. Dunbar, Inference or enaction? The impact of genre on the narrative processing of other minds. PLoS One 9(12), e114172 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Caracciolo, Narrative, meaning, interpretation: An enactivist approach. Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci. 11(3), 367–384 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    K. Dautenhahn, The narrative intelligence hypothesis: In search of the transactional format of narratives in humans and other social animals, in Cognitive Technology: Instruments of Mind, (Springer, Berlin, 2001), pp. 248–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J.T. Delafield-Butt, C. Trevarthen, The ontogenesis of narrative: From moving to meaning. Front. Psychol. 6, 1157 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    D.D. Hutto, The narrative practice hypothesis: Origins and applications of folk psychology. R. Inst. Phil. Suppl. 60, 43–68 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    D.D. Hutto, The narrative practice hypothesis: Clarifications and implications. Philos. Explor. 11(3), 175–192 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    T. Froese et al., Using human–computer interfaces to investigate ‘mind-as-it-could-be’ from the first-person perspective. Cogn. Comput. 4(3), 365–382 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jelena Rosic
    • 1
  1. 1.Aalto UniversityHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations