Advertisement

Factors Affecting the Soil Analysis Technique Adopted by the Farmers

  • Moammar Dayoub
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

This study aimed to show the reality of farmers and determine the extent of their adoption of the recommendations of the fertilizer and the difficulties and problems they face. The study was conducted on a random sample, consisting of 95 farmers who had analyzed their field soil in scientific research centers in the southern agricultural region through the form specially prepared for this purpose. The results showed that the rate of adoption of the fertilizer recommendations reached an average of 36.9% in the southern region. The degree of adoption was 34.7% in the region. The results showed that 41% of farmers did not implement the recommendations because of the non-convenient analysis, and 34% due to neglect, and 15% due to the weather and environment, while 10% of them for lack of manure at the suitable time. The study also revealed that the independent factors affecting the continuing adoption of soil analysis are: a farm’s experience, the sampling method in farmers schools, the irrigated area, and personal knowledge of farmers in analyzing the soil. Also, it shows that the application of fertilizer recommendations led to an increased production of 15–20%, this analysis emphasizes the importance of soil analysis and adherence to the recommendations of the research centers.

Keywords

Soil analysis Adoption Recommendations of the fertilizer 

References

  1. Abdul Latif, A. (1996). The economics of land. Syria: Aleppo University Press, College of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  2. Deep, M. (1999). Fertility and plant nutrition (2nd ed.). Syria: University of Damascus.Google Scholar
  3. FAO. (2015). Project design and management training program for professionals in the water sector in the middle east.Google Scholar
  4. GCSAR. (2015). Annual reports for the management of natural resources research, 2008–2015.Google Scholar
  5. MOAR. (2015). Annual agricultural statistical abstract. Damascus, Syria.Google Scholar
  6. NAPC. (2014). The state of food and agriculture in Syria. National Center for Agricultural Policy.Google Scholar
  7. Ryan, J. E. (2013). Soil and plant analysis laboratory manual. In The International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TurkuTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations