Advertisement

An Analysis of the Status of CSR Practice in the South African Business Context: A Framework for Analysis

  • Elrida Vos
  • Niël Oberholzer
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

South African organisations often focus on financial targets instead of building relationships with stakeholders in their operating environments (Verwey and Muir in Communication and media ethics in South Africa. JUTA & Company, Cape Town, pp. 210–229, 2011: 212). The political, economic and socio-economic circumstances within the country and increased demands from different stakeholders with their own specific interests, have created an unpredictable and volatile environment in which organisations have to function (Nasrullah and Rahim in CSR, sustainability, ethics & governance. Springer, Cham, 2014: 41). This volatility, along with mounting social pressure, means that no organisation can function in isolation. Implementing Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) activities only for reputational benefit results in a “check-the-box” approach to CSR which is unsustainable over time. In order to address the unsustainable nature of CSR practices in South Africa, this paper proposes an adaptation of the DNA of CSR 2.0 model previously developed by Visser (CSR 2.0 transforming corporate sustainability and responsibility. Springer, London, 2014: 1). Limitations are addressed with regard to the South African business context, and recommendations are made to address the remaining limitations of this model.

Keywords

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) Sustainability Stakeholders Socio economic conditions 

References

  1. Abdulai, D. (2015). From charity to mutual benefit: A new and sustainable look at CSR in Africa. In New perspectives on corporate social responsibility (pp. 427–442).Google Scholar
  2. Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2007). Investor sentiment in the stock market. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 129–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bosman, P., & Buys, P. (2010). The ethics of corporate sustainability (pp. 9–12). Autumn: Word and Action.Google Scholar
  4. Dash, N. K. (2005). Selection of the research paradigm and research methodology [Online]. Available from: http://www.celt.mmu.ac.uk/researchmethods/Modules/Selection_of_methodology/. Accessed August 22, 2016.
  5. Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. The Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fasset (Finance and Accounting Services Sector Education and Training Authority). (2012). Corporate social responsibility course handbook. Johannesburg: Fasset.Google Scholar
  7. Holman, P. (2010). Engaging emergence. Turning upheaval into opportunity. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Hurn, B. J. (2008). Ethics in international business. Industrial and Commercial Training, 40(7), 347–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. King, M. E. (2016). Draft King IV Report on corporate governance for South Africa 2016. Institute of Directors South Africa (unpublished).Google Scholar
  10. Mersham, G., & Skinner, C. (2008). Corporate social responsibility in South Africa: Emerging trends. Society and Business Review, 3(3), 239–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Munro, V. (2013). Stakeholder understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in emerging markets with a focus on Middle East, Africa (MEA) and Asia. Journal of Global Policy and Governance, 2, 59–77.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40320-013-0026-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nasrullah, N. M., & Rahim, M. M. (2014). Trends in CSR practices in developed and developing countries. In CSR, sustainability, ethics & governance. Cham: Springer. Available from:  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02350-2_3.
  13. Overton-de Klerk, N., & Oelofse, E. (2010). Poor communities as corporate stakeholders: A bottom up research approach. Communicatio, 36(3), 388–408.Google Scholar
  14. Overton-de Klerk, N., & Verwey, S. (2013). Towards an emerging paradigm of strategic communication: Core driving forces. Communicatio, 39(3), 362–382.Google Scholar
  15. Spicer, C. H. (2000). Public relations in a democratic society: Value and values. Journal of Public Relations Research, 12(1), 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ströh, U. (2007). Relationships and participation: A complexity science approach to change communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1(2), 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Verwey, S. (2001). Into the age of communication. Communicatio, 27(1), 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Verwey, S., & Muir, C. (2011). Ethical corporate communication cultures within brand environments. In N. Hyde-Clarke (Ed.), Communication and media ethics in South Africa (pp. 210–229). Cape Town: JUTA & Company.Google Scholar
  19. Visser, W. (2014). CSR 2.0 transforming corporate sustainability and responsibility (1st ed.). London: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. West, A. (2014). Ubuntu and business ethics: Problems, perspectives and prospects. Journal of Business Ethics, 121, 47–61.Google Scholar
  21. Zerfass, A., & Huck, S. (2007). Innovation, communication and leadership: New developments in strategic communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1(2), 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Finance and Investment ManagementUniversity of JohannesburgJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations