Policies for Crafts: Rationale and Tools

  • Anna MignosaEmail author


Public intervention for culture is widespread and takes place with differences among different countries. That depends on the way of conceiving the role of the State in the society and economy, the institutional framework, and the priorities set for cultural policies. The same holds true for crafts policies. These differences reflect the different reasons that justify public intervention for the sector and affect the tools that can be used to implement the policies. The chapter illustrates the reasons that cultural economists use to justify government intervention for culture and crafts, more specifically. It also shows which tools are used, depending on the rationale for public intervention, focusing specifically on the craft sector.


Crafts policies Public intervention Creative industries Intangible heritage 


  1. Baicu, R., A. Klamer, and A. Mignosa. 2018. International Symposium Values of Crafts: Crafts as Intangible Heritage, Rotterdam, 1–2 March 2018—Final Report.Google Scholar
  2. Baumol, William J., and William G. Bowen. 1966. Performing Arts: The Economic Dilemma. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund.Google Scholar
  3. Braun, E., and M. Lavanga. 2007. An International Comparative Quick Scan of National Policies for Creative Industries. Rotterdam: Euricur for the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science of the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  4. Frey, B., and Pommerehne. 1989. Muses and Markets: Explorations in the Economics of the Arts. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Gaillard, B., and D. Rodwell. 2015. A Failure of Process? Comprehending the Issues Fostering Heritage Conflict in Dresden Elbe Valley and Liverpool—Maritime Mercantile City World Heritage Sites. The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice 6 (1): 16–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gathmann, C., and F.K. Lembcke. 2017. From Licensing to Certification: An Analysis of Germany’s Crafts and Trade Sector. Mimeo. Google Scholar
  7. Klamer, A., L. Petrova, and A. Mignosa. 2006. Financing the Arts and Culture in the European Union. European Parliament. Google Scholar
  8. Mignosa, A. 2016. Theory and Practice of Cultural Heritage Policy. In The Artful Economist: A New Look at Cultural Economics, ed. I. Rizzo and R. Towse, 227–244, Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  9. Peacock, A. 1994. A Future for the Past: The Political Economy of Heritage, Paper No. 44. Edinburgh: The David Hume Institute.Google Scholar
  10. Peacock, A. (ed.). 1998. Does the Past Have a Future? The Political Economy of Heritage. London: The Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
  11. Rizzo, I. 2011. Regulation. In A Handbook of Cultural Economics, ed. R. Towse, 386–393. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  12. Santagata, W. 2002. Cultural Districts, Property Rights and Sustainable Economic Growth. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 26 (1): 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Schoch, D. 2014. Whose World Heritage? Dresden’s Waldschlößchen Bridge and UNESCO’s Delisting of the Dresden Elbe Valley 1. International Journal of Cultural Property 21 (2): 199–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Stiglitz, J.E., and J.K. Rosengard. 2015. Economics of the Public Sector: Fourth International Student Edition. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  15. Throsby, D. 1997. Seven Questions in the Economics of Cultural Heritage. In Economic Perspectives of Cultural Heritage, ed. M. Hutter and I. Rizzo, 13–30. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Throsby, D. 2010. The Economics of Cultural Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  17. Towse, R. 2010. A Textbook of Cultural Economics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. UNESCO. 2018a. World Heritage List. Available at Last Retrieved August 16, 2018.
  19. UNESCO. 2018b. Purpose of the Lists of Intangible Cultural Heritage and of the Register of Good Safeguarding Practices. Available at Last Retrieved August 16, 2018.
  20. Van der Ploeg, F. 2006. The Making of Cultural Policy: A European Perspective. In Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, ed. V.A. Ginsburgh and D. Throsby, vol. 1, 1183–1221. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CataniaCataniaItaly
  2. 2.Erasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations