Advertisement

Material Is the Mother of Innovation

  • Maikel H. G. KuijpersEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This contribution looks at the future of craft through the lens of archaeology. Exploring the role of craft and skill in the long-term development of human societies, I use this knowledge to frame an answer to the question ‘what future developments may happen through craft?’ Through the example of bronze—a novel material that ushered the Bronze Age—I show how the affordances of a material may guide thinking, and affect worldviews. Bronze helped formulate notions of design, copying, and recycling. From this, I advocate that we should look at craft as a heuristic device, rather than categorically. Materials are a source of innovations, and it is through craft that these innovations are brought about.

Keywords

Archaeology Economic anthropology Bronze age 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Anna Mignosa for her kind invitation to write a chapter for this book, at a very late stage in the process. She convinced me saying that she likes to be academically ‘contaminated’, which to my mind sounds far more exciting than disciplinary purity. Arjo Klamer is thanked for inviting me to the Values of Craft symposium in Rotterdam. This chapter benefitted from a workshop in Leiden under the same title. Thanks to all the participants of these meetings. Some special thanks are needed for a few people always willing to help, even when it is very late notice. Catalin Popa, Ulrika Botzojorns, Nienke Broekema, and David Fontijn made sure that the chapter was written coherently, despite the slight rush to get it finished on time. Any errors and incoherency left are my doing. Financial support came from the project ‘Economies of Destruction. The Emergence of Metalwork Deposition during the Bronze Age in Northwest Europe, C. 2300-1500BC.’, funded by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO project number: 277-60-001).

References

  1. Adamson, G. 2013. The Invention of Craft. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  2. Appleby, G., and M.L.S. Sørensen. 2018. Forming Metal: The Development of Moulds. In Creativity in the Bronze Age: Understanding Innovation in Pottery, Textile, and Metalwork Production, ed. J. Sofaer, L. Bender Jørgensen, and M.L. Stig Sørensen, 99–106. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/creativity-in-the-bronze-age/forming-metal-the-development-of-moulds/3849D210011E5800145FF970C0879EE2.
  3. Ball, P. 2010. Making Stuff: From Bacon to Bakelite. In Seeing Further. The Story of Science & The Royal Society, ed. B. Bryson, 295–320. London: Harper Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barker, G., C. Roberts, C. Gosden, A. Horning, and K. Welham. 2017. Reflections on Archaeology. London: British Academy.Google Scholar
  5. Benjamin, W. 2008. The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, trans. J.A. Underwood. Great Ideas. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  6. Bentley-Condit, V.K., and E.O. Smith. 2010. Animal Tool Use: Current Definitions and an Updated Comprehensive Catalog. Behaviour 147 (2): 185–32A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boivin, N. 2008. Material Cultures, Material Minds: The Impact of Things on Human Thought, Society, and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brück, J. 2004. Material Metaphors: The Relational Construction of Identity in Early Bronze Age Burials in Ireland and Britain. Journal of Social Archaeology 4 (3): 307–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Budd, P., and T. Taylor. 1995. The Faerie Smith Meets the Bronze Industry: Magic Versus Science in the Interpretation of Prehistoric Metal‐Making. World Archaeology 27 (1): 133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Callaway, E. 2013. Neanderthals Made Leather-Working Tools Like Those in Use Today. Nature News. http://www.nature.com/news/neanderthals-made-leather-working-tools-like-those-in-use-today-1.13542.
  11. Clark, A. 2008. Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. Philosophy of Mind Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Edgeworth, M. 2010. Beyond Human Proportions: Archaeology of the Mega and the Nano. Archaeologies 6 (1): 138–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eerkens, J. 2000. Practice Makes Within 5% of Perfect: Visual Perception, Motor Skills, and Memory in Artifact Variation. Current Anthropology 41 (4): 663–668.Google Scholar
  14. Forel, B., M. Gabillot, F. Monna, S. Forel, C.H. Dommergues, S. Gerber, C. Petit, C. Mordant, and C. Chateau. 2009. Morphometry of Middle Bronze Age Palstaves by Discrete Cosine Transform. Journal of Archaeological Science 36 (3): 721–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Geim, A.K. 2009. Graphene: Status and Prospects. Science 324 (5934): 1530–1534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guldi, J., and D. Armitage. 2014. The History Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Heidegger, M. 2011. Basic Writings: Martin Heidegger. London: Routledge Classics.Google Scholar
  18. Hodder, I. 2011. Human-Thing Entanglement: Towards an Integrated Archaeological Perspective. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 17 (1): 154–177. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. ———. 2012. Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships Between Humans and Things. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  20. Høgseth, H.B. 2012. Knowledge Transfer: The Craftsmen’s Abstraction. In Archaeology and Apprenticeship: Body Knowledge, Identity, and Communities of Practice, ed. W. Wendrich, 61–79. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  21. Ingold, T. 2000. The Perception of the Environment: Essays in Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Kintigh, K.W., J.H. Altschul, M.C. Beaudry, R.D. Drennan, A.P. Kinzig, T.A. Kohler, W.F. Limp, et al. 2014. Grand Challenges for Archaeology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (3): 879–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kristiansen, K., and P. Suchowska-Ducke. 2015. Connected Histories: The Dynamics of Bronze Age Interaction and Trade 1500–1100 BC. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 81: 361–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kuijpers, M.H.G. 2018. An Archaeology of Skill: Metalworking Skill and Material Specialization in Early Bronze Central Europe. Routledge Studies in Archaeology. London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
  25. Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Lenerz-De Wilde, M. 1995. Prämonetäre Zahlungsmittel in Der Kupfer- Und Bronzezeit. Fündberichten Aus Baden-Württemberg 20: 229–327.Google Scholar
  27. Lenoir, M.L. 2017. The Axe and the Why: A Research into the Occurrence of Metrological Systems and Metric Patterns within Early Bronze Age Axe Hoards of Central Europe. Master thesis, Leiden University. https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/handle/1887/52667.
  28. Malafouris, L. 2013. How Things Shape the Mind: A Theory of Material Engagement. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. McGilchrist, I. 2010. The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Miller, G. 2018. Animal Laborans, Homo Faber, or Something Else? Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7 (3): 1–4. Google Scholar
  31. Morris, I. 2015. Foragers, Farmers, and Fossil Fuels: How Human Values Evolve. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Oakley, K. 1949. Man the Tool-Maker. London: British Museum.Google Scholar
  33. Pesch, U. in review. Making Innovation Public: Imaginaries and Metamorphoses.Google Scholar
  34. Renfrew, C. 2007. Prehistory: The Making of the Human Mind. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
  35. Roberts, B.W., C.P. Thornton, and V.C. Pigott. 2009. Development of Metallurgy in Eurasia. Antiquity 83 (322): 1012–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rowlands, M. 2013. The New Science of the Mind: From Extended Mind to Embodied Phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  37. Sennett, R. 2009. The Craftsman. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  38. Shew, A. 2017. Animal Constructions and Technological Knowledge. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  39. Shorter, M. 2015. The Craft Technologist. Studies in Material Thinking 13: 1–19.Google Scholar
  40. Shumaker, R.W., K.R. Walkup, and B.B. Beck. 2011. Animal Tool Behavior: The Use and Manufacture of Tools by Animals. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar
  41. Singh, V., D. Joung, L. Zhai, S. Das, S.I. Khondaker, and S. Seal. 2011. Graphene Based Materials: Past, Present and Future. Progress in Materials Science 56 (8): 1178–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sørensen, T.F. 2012. Original Copies: Seriality, Similarity and the Simulacrum in the Early Bronze Age. Danish Journal of Archaeology 1 (1): 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sørensen, M.L.S., and G. Appleby. 2018. Making Metals: From Copper to Bronze. In Creativity in the Bronze Age: Understanding Innovation in Pottery, Textile, and Metalwork Production, ed. J. Sofaer, L. Bender Jørgensen, and M.L. Stig Sørensen, 37–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Soressi, M., S.P. McPherron, M. Lenoir, T. Dogandžić, P. Goldberg, Z. Jacobs, Y. Maigrot, et al. 2013. Neandertals Made the First Specialized Bone Tools in Europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (35): 14186–14190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stockhammer, P.W. 2017. The Dawn of the Copy in the Bronze Age. In The Transformative Power of the Copy: A Transcultural and Interdisciplinary Approach, vol. 2, ed. C. Forberg and P.W. Stockhammer, 169–189. Heidelberg Studies on Transculturality. Heidelberg: Heidelberg University Publishing.Google Scholar
  46. Sutton, J. 2008. Material Agency, Skills and History: Distributed Cognition and the Archaeology of Memory. In Material Agency: Towards a Non-Anthropocentric Approach, ed. C. Knappett and L. Malafouris, 37–55. Berlin: Springer. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Taylor, A.H., and R.D. Gray. 2014. Is There a Link Between the Crafting of Tools and the Evolution of Cognition? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 5 (6): 693–703.Google Scholar
  48. Tegel, W., R. Elburg, D. Hakelberg, H. Stäuble, and U. Büntgen. 2012. Early Neolithic Water Wells Reveal the World’s Oldest Wood Architecture. PLOS One 7 (12): e51374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. UNESCO. 2018. Basic Texts of the 2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, 2018 Edition. Paris.Google Scholar
  50. Vandkilde, H. 2016. Bronzization: The Bronze Age as Pre-modern Globalization. Praehistorische Zeitschrift 91 (1): 103–123.Google Scholar
  51. Villaroya, A.A. 2013. The Crafts, Between Heritagisation and Digitalization. VOCI Annuale di Scienze Umane X: 11–20. Google Scholar
  52. Weir, A.A.S., J. Chappell, and A. Kacelnik. 2002. Shaping of Hooks in New Caledonian Crows. Science 297 (5583): 981. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Whiten, A., V. Horner, and F.B.M. de Waal. 2005. Conformity to Cultural Norms of Tool Use in Chimpanzees. Nature 437 (7059): 737–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Whiten, A., A. Spiteri, V. Horner, K.E. Bonnie, S.P. Lambeth, S.J. Schapiro, and F.B.M. de Waal. 2007. Transmission of Multiple Traditions Within and Between Chimpanzee Groups. Current Biology 17 (12): 1038–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Leiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations