Advertisement

EU Funds in the New Member States

  • Christian Hagemann
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics book series (PSEUP)

Abstract

This chapter gives an overview of the contents of the book and its structure. It introduces the puzzle of absorption problems in Central and Eastern Europe, discusses potential explanations for these problems, and then highlights the approach of analysis. After briefly introducing the main themes of party politicization and patronage, pre-accession reforms, and financial and economic crisis, it gives a brief summary of the framework for analysis and of the following chapters.

Keywords

Absorption problems Central and eastern europe Party politicization and patronage Pre-accession reforms Financial and economic crisis 

References

  1. Åslund, A. (2010). The Last Shall Be the First: The East European Financial Crisis. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  2. Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. B. (2013). Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  3. Beach, D., & Rohlfing, I. (2018). Integrating Cross-Case Analyses and Process Tracing in Set-Theoretic Research Strategies and Parameters of Debate. Sociological Methods & Research, 47(1), 3–36.Google Scholar
  4. Bloom, S., & Petrova, V. (2013). National Subversion of Supranational Goals: ‘Pork-Barrel’ Politics and EU Regional Aid. Europe-Asia Studies, 65(8), 1599–1620.Google Scholar
  5. Bohle, D. (2011). East European Transformations and the Paradoxes of Transnationalization. In J. DeBardeleben & A. Hurrelmann (Eds.), Transnational Europe: Promise, Paradox, Limits (pp. 130–151). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Buzogány, A., & Korkut, U. (2013). Administrative Reform and Regional Development Discourses in Hungary. Europeanisation Going NUTS? Europe-Asia Studies, 65(8), 1555–1577.Google Scholar
  7. Buzogány, A., & Stuchlík, A. (2010). Wandlungen in Kafkas Schloß? Verwaltungsreform und -Modernisierung in Mittel- und Osteuropa. In H. Hill (Ed.), Verwaltungsmodernisierung 2010 (pp. 255–281). Nomos: Baden-Baden.Google Scholar
  8. Česká Pozice. (2011). Billions in EU Funds May Go Up Dobeš’s Chimney (Published 5 April 2011). Available at http://ceskapozice.lidovky.cz/billions-in-eu-funds-may-go-up-dobes-s-chimney-fn4-/tema.aspx?c=A110404_121659_pozice_10614. Accessed 13 Feb 2016.
  9. Dellmuth, L. M., & Stoffel, M. F. (2012). Distributive Politics and Intergovernmental Transfers: The Local Allocation of European Union Structural Funds. European Union Politics, 13(3), 413–433.Google Scholar
  10. Dimitrova, A. L. (2005). Europeanization and Civil Service Reform in Central and Eastern Europe. In F. Schimmelfennig & U. Sedelmeier (Eds.), The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 71–90). Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  11. European Commission. (2013, April 18). Cohesion Policy: Strategic Report 2013. COM(2013) 210 final. Brussels: European Commission. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/how/policy/doc/strategic_report/2013/strat_report_2013_en.pdf. Accessed 15 Mar 2017.
  12. George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Goetz, K. H. (2001). Making Sense of Post-communist Central Administration: Modernization, Europeanization or Latinization? Journal of European Public Policy, 8(6), 1032–1051.Google Scholar
  14. Goetz, K. H., & Wollmann, H. (2001). Governmentalizing Central Executives in Post-communist Europe: A Four-Country Comparison. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(6), 864–887.Google Scholar
  15. Ilie, L. (2011). Romania’s Roads to Nowhere (Special Report). Bucharest: Reuters. Available at http://www.reuters.com/article/us-romania-infrastructure-idUSTRE74P0ZK20110526. Accessed 12 Feb 2016.
  16. Kopecký, P. (2006). Political Parties and the State in Post-communist Europe: The Nature of Symbiosis. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 22(3), 251–273.Google Scholar
  17. Kopecký, P., & Mair, P. (2012). Party Patronage as an Organizational Resource. In P. Kopecký, P. Mair, & M. Spirova (Eds.), Party Patronage and Party Government in European Democracies (pp. 3–16). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lewis, P. (2002). Political Parties in Post-communist Eastern Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Meyer-Sahling, J.-H. (2004). Civil Service Reform in Post-communist Europe: The Bumpy Road to Depoliticisation. West European Politics, 27(1), 71–103.Google Scholar
  20. Meyer-Sahling, J.-H. (2006). The Rise of the Partisan State? Parties, Patronage and the Ministerial Bureaucracy in Hungary. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 22(3), 274–297.Google Scholar
  21. Meyer-Sahling, J.-H. (2008). The Changing Colours of the Post-communist State: The Politicisation of the Senior Civil Service in Hungary. European Journal of Political Research, 47(1), 1–33.Google Scholar
  22. Meyer-Sahling, J.-H. (2011). The Durability of EU Civil Service Policy in Central and Eastern Europe After Accession. Governance, 24(2), 231–260.Google Scholar
  23. Milio, S. (2008). How Political Stability Shapes Administrative Performance: The Italian Case. West European Politics, 31(5), 915–936.Google Scholar
  24. Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2007). Is East-Central Europe Backsliding? EU Accession is no ‘End of History’. Journal of Democracy, 18(4), 8–16.Google Scholar
  25. Myant, M., & Drahokoupil, J. (2012). International Integration, Varieties of Capitalism and Resilience to Crisis in Transition Economies. Europe-Asia Studies, 64(1), 1–33.Google Scholar
  26. O’Dwyer, C. (2004). Runaway State Building: How Political Parties Shape States in Postcommunist Eastern Europe. World Politics, 56(4), 520–553.Google Scholar
  27. Piattoni, S., & Smyrl, M. (2003). Building Effective Institutions: Italian Regions and the EU Structural Funds. In J. Bukowski, S. Piattoni, & M. Smyrl (Eds.), Between Europeanization and Local Societies: The Space for Territorial Governance (pp. 133–156). Lanham et al.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  28. Ragin, C. C. (1987). The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley et al.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  29. Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. Rouban, L. (2003). Politicization of the Civil Service. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Handbook of Public Administration (pp. 310–320). London et al.: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. SAR. (2011). Morti de foame, cu banii in buzunar. Raport SAR. Bucharest: Societatea Academica din Romania. Available at http://sar.org.ro/morti-de-foame-cu-banii-in-buzunar-autoritatile-romane-sunt-depasite-de-sarcina-de-a-cheltui-15-milioane-euro-pe-zi/. Accessed 12 Feb 2016.
  32. Schimmelfennig, F. (2001). The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union. International Organization, 55(1), 47–80.Google Scholar
  33. Schneider, C. Q., & Rohlfing, I. (2013). Combining QCA and Process Tracing in Set-Theoretic Multi-method Research. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(4), 559–597.Google Scholar
  34. Schraff, D. (2014). Buying Turnout or Rewarding Loyalists? Electoral Mobilization and EU Structural Funding in the German Länder. European Union Politics, 15(2), 277–288.Google Scholar
  35. Shefter, M. (1994). Political Parties and the State: The American Historical Experience. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Surubaru, N.-C. (2017a). Administrative Capacity or Quality of Political Governance? EU Cohesion Policy in the New Europe, 2007–13. Regional Studies, 51(6), 844–856.Google Scholar
  37. Surubaru, N.-C. (2017b). Revisiting the Role of Domestic Politics: Politicisation and European Cohesion Policy Performance in Central and Eastern Europe. East European Politics, 33(1), 106–125.Google Scholar
  38. Vachudova, M. A. (2005). Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage, and Integration After Communism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Verheijen, T. (1999). Civil Service Systems in EU Candidate States: Introduction. In T. Verheijen & A. Kotchegura (Eds.), Civil Service Systems in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 85–91). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Hagemann
    • 1
  1. 1.Technical University MunichMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations