Advertisement

Performance Budgeting in the Netherlands

  • Tjerk BuddingEmail author
  • Bram Faber
  • Ed Vosselman
Chapter
Part of the Governance and Public Management book series (GPM)

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of the development of Performance Budgeting in the Netherlands, both at the level of central government and at the level of municipalities. In central government, there has been a development toward Accountable Budgeting, addressing three ‘what’-questions: what does the minister want to achieve?, what will the minister do in order to achieve the goals?, and what does the civil service apparatus resorting under the responsibility of the minister cost? In municipalities, there was a development toward Direct Costing (no allocation of overhead cost to policy areas) and the mandatory publication of financial and policy indicators. In a general sense, the chapter discusses that the translation of programs, their activities and their resource consumption into numbers is connected to control from a distance, both in terms of space and time. Such translation is not a simple linear and straightforward process, and is inherently political. Numbers are thus mediators rather than representations; they are matters of concern rather than matters of fact. When used properly, they have the potential to build trust.

Keywords

Accountable budgeting Performance indicators Transparency Mediators Trust 

References

  1. Aardema, Harrie. 2002. Doorwerking van BBI, evaluatie van een veranderingsbeweging bij de Nederlandse gemeenten. Leusden: BMC.Google Scholar
  2. Advisory Committee on the Reporting System for the Central Government (Adviescommissie verslaggevingstelsel rijksoverheid, AVRo). 2017. Baten en lasten geherwaardeerd. Voor- en nadelen van verdere toevoeging van baten-lasten informatie. Rapportage. Ministerie van Financiën en Algemene Rekenkamer, maart.Google Scholar
  3. Agency for Research and Government Expenditure (Bureau Onderzoek en Rijksuitgaven, BOR). 2015. De macht en kracht van het budgetrecht; Het budgetrecht van de Tweede Kamer: Ontwikkelingen en verbeteringsmogelijkheden. The Hague, 2 April, Annex to Kamerstuk II 2014/15, 33 670, nr 11.Google Scholar
  4. Bac, Aad D., C.J.F. Knoop, and J.H. van Zanten. 1991. Gemeentelijk financieel beheer; een moderne kijk op gemeentefinanciën. Leiden: Stenfert Kroese.Google Scholar
  5. Budding, Tjerk, and Jan Hopstaken. 2010. Performance Management in the Era of Public Value Management. In Public Leadership and Citizen Value, ed. James W. Bjørkman, Rob van Eijbergen, Goos Minderman, and Hans Bekke, 179–192. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Budding, Tjerk, and Frans van Schaik. 2015. Public Sector Accounting and Auditing in the Netherlands. In Public Sector Accounting and Auditing in Europe, ed. Isabel Brusca, Eugenio Caperchione, Sandra Cohen, and Francesca Manes Rossi, 142–155. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. De Jong, Maarten, Iris van Beek, and Rense Posthumus. 2013. Introducing Accountable Budgeting Lessons from a Decade of Performance-Based Budgeting in the Netherlands. OECD Journal on Budgeting 12 (3): 71–104.Google Scholar
  8. Dekker, Pieter J., and Tjerk Budding. 2005. Kostentoerekening binnen duale begroting. Bank en Gemeente 32 (3): 14–17.Google Scholar
  9. Duisenberg, Pieter. 2016. New Development: How MPs in the Dutch Parliament Strengthened Their Budgetary and Accounting Powers. Public Money & Management 36 (7): 521–526.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2016.1237153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frey, Bruno S., Fabian Homberg, and Margit Osterloh. 2013. Organizational Control Systems and Pay-for-Performance in the Public Service. Organization Studies 34 (7): 949–972.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613483655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Groot, Tom, and Tjerk Budding. 2008. New Public Management’s Current Issues and Future Prospects. Financial Accountability & Management 24 (1): 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.2008.00440.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hendriks, Frank, and Pieter Tops. 2003. Local Public Management Reforms in the Netherlands: Fads, Fashions and Winds of Change. Public Administration 81 (2): 301–323.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hood, Christopher. 1995. The ‘New Public Management’ in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society 20 (2–3): 93–109.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)e0001-w.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoppe, Robert, Jaap Woldendorp, and Nils C. Bandelow. 2016. Sustainable Governance Indicators: 2016 Netherlands Report. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.Google Scholar
  15. Houppermans, Meyken, Peter van Hoesel, and Frans van Nispen. 2015. De geschiedenis van beleids onderzoek in Nederland. In Beleidsonderzoek in Nederland. Kennis voor beleid; ontwikkeling van een professie, ed. Peter H.M. van Hoesel et al., 1–36. Assen: Koninklijke Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
  16. Houwaart, Dick, R. van der Linde, J. Post, and K. Verduijn. 1995. Bestuurlijke vernieuwing, bedrijfsvoering en informatie; slotpublicatie Stichting BBI. Leusden: Stichting BBI.Google Scholar
  17. Kraan, Dirk-Jan. 2010. Uitgaven-heroverweging in OESO-landen. Tijdschrift voor Openbare Financiën 42 (2): 117–134.Google Scholar
  18. Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Miller, Peter, and Michael Power. 2013. Accounting, Organizing, and Economizing: Connecting Accounting Research and Organization Theory. The Academy of Management Annals 7 (1): 557–605.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2013.783668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development (OECD). 2014. Budgeting Practices and Procedures in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Pollitt, Christopher, and Geert Bouckaert. 2004. Public Management Reform; A Comparative Analysis, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Roberts, John. 2009. No One Is Perfect: The Limits of Transparency and an Ethic for ‘Intelligent’ Accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society 34 (8): 957–970.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schilder, Ard, Harrie Aardema, Mark van Dam, Robert Koldenhoff, and Herrie Geuzendam. 2010. Evaluatie financiële functie gemeenten en provincies. Amersfoort: BMC Advies en Management.Google Scholar
  24. Study Group for Budgetary Space (Studiegroep Begrotingsruimte). 2016. Van saldosturing naar stabilisatie (Report No. 15). The Hague, 1 July, Annex to Kamerstuk 34 300, nr. 74.Google Scholar
  25. Ter Bogt, Henk J. 2004. Politicians in Search of Performance Information?—Survey Research on Dutch Aldermen’s Use of Performance Information. Financial Accountability and Management 20 (3): 221–252.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0267-4424.2004.00387.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Van der Knaap, Peter. 2006. Responsive Evaluation and Performance Management. Evaluation 12 (3): 278–293.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389006069135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Van der Knaap, Peter. 2007. Results-Oriented Budgeting and Policy Evaluation: Accountable for Learning. In Making Accountability Work, ed. Marie-Louise Bemelmans-Videc, Jeremy Lonsdale, and Burt Perrin, 163–180. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. Van Helden, G. Jan. 1998. BBI in de praktijk - Een vergelijkend onderzoek naar de planning en control bij acht middelgrote gemeenten. Maastricht: Shaker Publishing.Google Scholar
  29. Van Helden, G. Jan. 2000. A Strategy for Implementing Cost Allocation in a Dutch Municipality. In Comparative Issues in Local Government Accounting, ed. Eugenio Caperchione and Ricardo Mussari, 125–141. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  30. VB Groep. 1995. Waardering en inzicht; de CV 1995 in breder perspectief. Voorburg: VB-Groep.Google Scholar
  31. Verhoest, Koen. 2010. The Relevance of Culture for NPM. In The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management, ed. Tom Christensen and Per Lægreid, 47–63. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Wiesel, Fredrika, and Sven Modell. 2014. From New Public Management to New Public Governance? Hybridization and Implications for Public Sector Consumerism. Financial Accountability & Management 30 (2): 175–205.  https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Business and EconomicsVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Institute for Management ResearchRadboud UniversityNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations