Advertisement

Performance Monitoring in New South Wales Australia

  • Roberta RyanEmail author
  • Joseph Drew
Chapter
Part of the Governance and Public Management book series (GPM)

Abstract

This case study focusses on performance monitoring of local government which is attracting greater attention from state agencies, regulators and the scholarly community. The chapter examines the case of New South Wales, Australia, which introduced performance monitoring for all councils in 2014 based on just seven financial ratios. This performance monitoring data was subsequently used to decide: (i) which councils would be forcibly amalgamated, (ii) which councils would gain access to cheaper finance, and (iii) the details of future improvement plans for councils. The first part of this chapter details the gaming which occurred as a result of the poor design of the 2014 performance monitoring framework whilst the second part explores solutions to the identified problems which formed part of a subsequent (council led project) in 2016 under the auspices of the Institute for Public Policy and Governance at the University of Technology Sydney.

Keywords

Performance monitoring Synecdoche Gaming New South Wales Australia Local government 

References

  1. Bevan, Gwyn, and Christopher Hood. 2006. What’s Measured Is What Matters: Targets and Gaming in the English Public Health Care System. Public Administration 84 (3): 517–538.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00600.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. De Bruijn, Hans. 2007. Managing Performance in the Public Sector. London: Routledge and Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  3. Department of Local Government (DLG). 2003. Comparative Information on New South Wales Local Government Councils, 2002–2003. Sydney: Department of Local Government.Google Scholar
  4. Drew, Joseph. 2017. Playing for Keeps: Local Government Distortion of Depreciation Accruals in Response to High-Stakes Public Policy-Making. Public Money & Management 38 (1): 57–64.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2017.1389542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Drew, Joseph, and Brian Dollery. 2014a. Estimating the Impact of the Proposed Greater Sydney Metropolitan Amalgamations on Municipal Financial Sustainability. Public Money & Management 34 (4): 281–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Drew, Joseph, and Brian Dollery. 2014b. Keeping It In-House—Households as an Alternative Proxy for Local Government Output. Australian Journal of Public Administration 73 (2): 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Drew, Joseph, and Brian Dollery. 2015a. Less Haste More Speed: The Fit for Future Reform Program in New South Wales Local Government. Australian Journal of Public Administration 75 (1): 78–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Drew, Joseph, and Brian Dollery. 2015b. Inconsistent Depreciation Practice and Public Policymaking: Local Government Reform in New South Wales. Australian Accounting Review 25 (1): 28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Drew, Joseph, and Brian Dollery. 2015c. The State of Things—The Dynamic Efficiency of Australian States and Territories. Economic Papers 34 (3): 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Drew, Joseph, and Brian Dollery. 2016a. Summary Execution: The Impact of Alternative Summarization Strategies on Local Governments. Public Administration Quarterly 40 (4): 814–841.Google Scholar
  11. Drew, Joseph, and Brian Dollery. 2016b. What’s in a Name? Assessing the Performance of Local Government Classification Systems. Local Government Studies 42 (2): 248–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Drew, Joseph, and Bligh Grant. 2017. Means, Motive and Opportunity: Distortion of Public Policy Making Performance Management Data. Australian Journal of Public Administration 75 (1): 237–250.Google Scholar
  13. Drew, Joseph, Janine O’Flynn, and Bligh Grant. 2017. Performing What? Exploring and Expanding the Notion of Synecdoche in Performance Management Practice. Public Administration Quarterly 42: 395–424.Google Scholar
  14. Le Grand, Julian. 2003. Motivation, Agency, and Public Policy: Of Knights & Knaves, Pawns & Queens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Le Grand, Julian. 2010. Knights and Knaves Return: Public Service Motivation and the Delivery of Public Services. International Public Management Journal 13 (1): 56–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Office of Local Government. 2015. Time Series Data. Sydney: Office of Local Government.Google Scholar
  17. Rezaee, Zabihollah. 2005. Causes, Consequences, and Deterence of Financial Statement Fraud. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 16 (3): 277–298.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1045-2354(03)00072-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Robertson, James, and Sam Buckingham-Jones. 2015. Sydney Councils Shift $1 Billion Repair Bill with Accounting ‘Fiction’ in Fit for the Future Scramble. Sydney Morning Herald, 22 June 2015.Google Scholar
  19. Walker, Richard M., George A. Boyne, and Gene A. Brewer. 2010. Public Management and Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Public Policy and GovernanceUniversity of Technology SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations