Conclusions: Networked Intimacy

  • Cristina Miguel


This chapter presents the main conclusions of the research project about intimacy practices in the age of social media and elaborates the concept of networked intimacy. The study focused on (mediated) intimacy practices among adults (25–49 years old) through three different platforms (Badoo, CouchSurfing, and Facebook) to analyse how users create and maintain intimate relationships through social media. The project combined a critical analysis of the politics of platforms with users’ perspectives of their intimacy practices through social media. The chapter synthesizes the empirical findings and locates the study in current academic debates.


Networked intimacy Personal relationships Privacy Sex Social media Strangers 


  1. Airbnb. (2018). What is verified ID? Date Accessed 9 June 2018.
  2. Anderson, T. L. (2005). Relationships among Internet attitudes, Internet use, romantic beliefs, and perceptions of online romantic relationships. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 8(6), 521–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Badoo. (2015). Safety and security tips. [Online]. Available from: Accessed 28 Dec 2015.
  4. Baym, N. K. (2010). Personal connection in the digital age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. boyd, d. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self: identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Chambers, D. (2013). Social media and personal relationships: Online intimacies and networked friendship. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fuchs, C. (2014). Social media: A critical introduction. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gürses, S., & Díaz, C. (2013). Two tales of privacy in online social networks. Security & Privacy, 11(3), 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hine, C. (2015). Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, embodied and everyday. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Hinton, S., & Hjorth, L. (2013). Understanding social media. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Hogan, B. (2010). The presentation of self in the age of social media: Distinguishing performances and exhibitions online. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(6), 377–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jamieson, L. (2012). Intimacy as a concept: Explaining social change in the context of globalisation or another form of ethnocentricism? Sociological Research Online. [Online], 1(1). Available from: Accessed 9 Feb 2013.
  14. Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (2013). Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Madden, M., & Duggan, M. (2013). Online dating & relationships. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Date Accessed 13 June 2018.
  16. Nissenbaum, H. (2009). Privacy in context: Technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford: University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Papacharissi, Z. (2010). A Private sphere: Democracy in a digital age. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  18. Rainie, H., & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The new social operating system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Vincent, J., & Fortunati, L. (2009). Electronic emotion: The mediation of emotion via information and communication technologies. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  21. Wessels, B. (2012). Identification and the practices of identity and privacy in everyday digital communication. New Media & Society, 14(8), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Young, A. L., & Quan-Haase, A. (2013). Privacy protection strategies on Facebook: The Internet privacy paradox revisited. Information, Communication & Society, 16(4), 479–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cristina Miguel
    • 1
  1. 1.Business SchoolLeeds Beckett UniversityLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations