Advertisement

Product Function Analysis: Reducing Cost of Production Service Line with Work Teams

  • Velia Castillo-PérezEmail author
  • Liliana Carrasco-Arméndariz
  • Mario Corral-Chacón
  • Ramon Elizondo-Rios
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 876)

Abstract

The study identifies diverse methodologies related to new designs development and implementation, in conjunction with product function analysis for each component interacting into system assembly, through multidisciplinary work teams. Automotive gasoline module and its components evaluated looking forward improvement opportunities and cost reductions, affecting directly components shape and quantity. Results show up: material components change, assembly components modification, components quantity goes up and down based on customer needs. Several methodologies combined as concurrent engineering, reverse engineering, and design for manufacturing among others are used. Prototypes constructed in 3D printer using selective laser sintering. Statistical tests were positive.

Keywords

Design process Function analysis Systems integration Work team Gasoline module 

References

  1. 1.
    Aguilar, J.A., Valencia, M.V., Martínez, M.F., Quiceno, C.A., Sandoval, C.M.:. Uso de la Teoría de Solución de Problemas Inventivos (TRIZ) en el análisis de productos de apoyo a la movilidad para detectar opotunidades de innovación. Ingeniería y Competitividad, pp. 137–157 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beyer, S.E., Jones, D.R., Catlin, M.L., Sawert, U., Hilderbrant, M., Wolfender, M.K., y otros. Patente nº US2003/0094458 A1. United StatesGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bryan, A., Ko, J., Hu, S.J., Koren, Y.: Co-Evolution of Product Families and Assembly Systems. CIRP, pp. 41–44 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Coha, T.F., Kostelic, R., Rasmussen, G.K.: Patente nº Patente no.4,945,884. United States (1990)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cross, N.: Creativity in design: analyzing and modeling the creative leap. Leonardo 30, 651–656 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kimural, F., Nielsen, J.A.: Design method for product family under manufacturing resource constraints. CIRP Annals Manufacturing Technology, pp. 139–142 (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Löfqvist, L. Design processes and novelity in small companies: a multiple case study. In: International Conference on Engineering Design, pp. 24–27. Stanford University, Stanford (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wagner, U., AlGeddawy, T., ElMaraghy, H., Müller, E.: Product family design for changeable learning factories. In: CIRP, pp. 195–200 (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Velia Castillo-Pérez
    • 1
  • Liliana Carrasco-Arméndariz
    • 1
  • Mario Corral-Chacón
    • 1
  • Ramon Elizondo-Rios
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Graduate Studies and ResearchTecnológico de Ciudad Juárez, Tecnológico Nacional de MéxicoCiudad Juárez, ChihuahuaMexico

Personalised recommendations