Advertisement

Investigation of Usability Issues Through Physiological Tools: An Experimental Study with Tourism Websites

  • Jyotish KumarEmail author
  • Jyoti Kumar
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 876)

Abstract

Existing usability testing methods using verbal reports and behavioural observations estimate the time consumed in different tasks and errors occurred therein etc., they fail to provide feedback on traits like attraction and excitement felt by users which is required for tourism websites to succeed. Thus there is a need to expand the usability parameters beyond cognitive measures like ease of use and efficiency etc. and into affective measures like attraction, enjoyment, excitement, etc. This study reports use of physiological measures within usability testing setup to measure affective parameters by means of galvanic skin response, eye tracker measures and behavioural responses. In light of the findings, this paper argues use of physiological measures as an objective, low cost and practical addition to usability testing practice to enrich the usability testing findings and pave way for website designers for affective improvements into their sites.

Keywords

Usability testing Eye tracker GSR, behavioural response 

References

  1. 1.
    Hudlicka, E.: To feel or not to feel: the role of affect in human–computer interaction. Int. J. Hum.Comput. Stud. 59(1–2), 1–32 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Conati, C.: Probabilistic assessment of user’s emotions in educational games. Appl. Artif. Intell. 16, 555–575 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Norman, D.: Emotion & design: attractive things work better. Interactions 9, 36–42 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Duchowski, A.: Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice, vol. 373. Springer, London (2007)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goldberg, J.H., Kotval, X.P.: Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: methods and constructs. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 24(6), 631–645 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ehmke, C., Wilson, S.: Identifying web usability problems from eye-tracking data. In: HCI 2007, pp. 119–128 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fiedler, S., Glockner, A.: The dynamics of decision making in risky choice: an eye-tracking analysis: (519682015-072). PsycEXTRA Dataset. APA (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liversedge, S.P., Findlay, J.M.: Saccadic eye movements and cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4(1), 6–14 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goldberg, J.H., Stimson, M.J., Lewenstein, M., Scott, N., Wichansky, A.M.: Eye tracking in web search tasks: design implications. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications, ETRA 2002, pp. 51–58 (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Phillips, M.H., Edelman, J.A.: The dependence of visual scanning performance on search direction and difficulty. Vis. Res. 48(21), 2184–2192 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Boehm-Davis, D.A., Gray, W.D., Schoelles, M.J.: The eye blink as a physiological indicator of cognitive workload. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 44, no. 33, July 2000Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Siegle, G.J., Ichikawa, N., Steinhauer, S.: Blink before and after you think: blinks occur prior to and following cognitive load indexed by pupillary responses. Psychophysiology 45(5), 679–687 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jacob, R.J.K., Karn, K.S.: Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research. In: The Mind’s Eye, pp. 573–605. Elsevier (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nourbakhsh, N., Wang, Y., Chen, F., Calvo, R.A.: Using galvanic skin response for cognitive load measurement in arithmetic and reading tasks. In: Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on, OzCHI 2012, pp. 420–423 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lykken, D.T., Venables, P.H.: Direct measurement of skin conductance: a proposal for standardization. Psychophysiology 8(5), 656–672 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mehler, B., Reimer, B., Coughlin, J.F., Dusek, J.A.: Impact of incremental increases in cognitive workload on physiological arousal and performance in young adult drivers. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2138(1), 6–12 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kahneman, D.: Experienced utility and objective happiness: a moment-based approach. In: Choices, Values and Frames, pp. 673–692 (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of Technology DelhiNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations