Advertisement

User-Centered-Design Approach to Evaluate the User Acceptance of Seating Postures for Autonomous Driving Secondary Activities in a Passenger Vehicle

  • Sibashis ParidaEmail author
  • Sai Mallavarapu
  • Sylvester Abanteriba
  • Matthias Franz
  • Wolfgang Gruener
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 876)

Abstract

With the development of autonomous driving technology, the passenger vehicles of the future, would allow drivers to participate in non-driving secondary activities or use-cases. In order to facilitate the non-driving use-cases, the interior and the seating arrangements of autonomous passenger vehicles needs to be designed accordingly, The aim of the study is to derive common seating positions and angles for the different autonomous driving secondary activities from their original environments and then experimentally evaluate the user acceptance of these postures for each secondary activity in a passenger vehicle. A user experience questionnaire (UEQ) approach is used to evaluate the user acceptance of the seating postures for the mentioned autonomous driving secondary activity or use-cases. The secondary activities considered in the study include; use of laptop, use of smartphone, general reading, window gazing and sleeping. The angles used for the seating postures include; seat-pan angle, back rest angle and neck-flexion angle.

Keywords

Autonomous driving Autonomous driving secondary activities Vehicle seating Seating posture Autonomous driving vehicle interior User experience 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The study was conducted in co-operation with BMW Group, Germany and RMIT University, Australia.

References

  1. 1.
    Parida, S., Franz, M., Abanteriba, S., Mallavarapu, S.: Autonomous driving cars: future prospects, obstacles, user acceptance and public opinion. In: Stanton (Hg.) Advances in Human Aspects, vol. 786, pp. 318–328 (2018)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    SAE International: SAE International’s levels of driving automation for on-road vehicles (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lyons, G., Jain, J., Holley, D.: The use of travel time by rail passengers in Great Britain. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2006.05.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pfleging, B., Schmidt, A.: (Non-)Driving-related activities in the car: defining driver activities for manual and automated drivingGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schoettle, B., Sivak, M.: A survey of public opinion about autonomous and self-driving vehicles in the US, the UK, and AU. The University of Michigan Transport Research Institute (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cyganski, R., Fraedrich, E., Lenz, B.: Travel time valuation for automated driving: a use-case driven studyGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Naujoks, F., Purucker, C., Neukum, A.: Secondary task engagement and vehicle automation – comparing the effects of different automation levels in an on-road experiment. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.01.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kamp, I., Kilincsoy, U., Vink, P.: Chosen postures during specific sitting activities. Ergonomics (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2011.618230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Parida, S., Mallavarapu, S., Franz, M., Abanteriba, S.: A literature review of seating and body angles for non-driving secondary activities in autonomous driving vehicles. In: Stanton, N. (ed.) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation. Proceedings of the AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 786, pp. 398–409. Springer International PU, [S.l.] (2018)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schrepp, M., Hinderks, A., Thomaschewski, J.: Design and evaluation of a short version of the user experience questionnaire (UEQ-S). IJIMAI (2017).  https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2017.09.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schrepp, M., Hinderks, A., Thomaschewski, J.: Construction of a benchmark for the user experience questionnaire (UEQ). IJIMAI (2017).  https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2017.445CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sibashis Parida
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Sai Mallavarapu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sylvester Abanteriba
    • 3
  • Matthias Franz
    • 1
  • Wolfgang Gruener
    • 1
  1. 1.BMW GroupMunichGermany
  2. 2.Technische Hocschule IngolstadtIngolstadtGermany
  3. 3.RMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations