Advertisement

Enhancing User Experience with Embodied Cognition

  • SuKyoung KimEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 876)

Abstract

The emerging design disciplines and research are rapidly transforming, and not only designer-driven, but also user-driven are prominent values in the design process. This paper presents a considerable design discipline towards enhanced user experience focused on embodied cognition, by distinguishing the following definitions in the concept model: human-being, subjective innate filter, and experience. In the approach, the suggestion in embodied cognition were considered that people’s cognitive processes are tightly related to the interaction between their body and the physical environment for enhancing user experience in their daily lives. By verifying the relationship between subjective innate filter and relevant variables, it clarifies how to enhance user experience with embodied cognition in design.

Keywords

Design theory Research methodology Evaluation Inclusive User experience 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Each experiment was supported by KAKENHI and Sapporo City University.

References

  1. 1.
    Kant, I.: Critique of Pure Reason. Penguin Classics, London (2008). Revised edition 37 (a), 23 (b)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schütte, S.: Designing Feelings into Products: Integrating Kansei Engineering Methodology in Product Development. Linköping Studies in Science and Technology Thesis, no. 946 (2002) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kim, S., Cho, Y., Niki, K., Yamanadka, T.: Integrating affective values to sustainable behavior focused on Kansei engineering. Int. J. Sustain. Eng. 9(6), 378–389 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kim, S., Cho, Y.: Towards enhanced affective design: rethinking the notion of design. In: The Proceeding of International Conference on Design Engineering and Product Innovation (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim, S.: Design for Transformation by Minding the Gap between Visual and Olfactory Perception. World Design Summit 2017 (Montreal Canada 10.16-20) (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hummels, C., Frens, J.: The reflective transformative design process. In: Proceeding of CHI EA 2009: Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing System, pp. 2655–2258 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hassenzahl, M.: User experience and experience design. In: The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd edn. (2013). Chapter 3Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bule, L.: The User Experience Team of One: A Research and Design Survival Guide Rosenfeld Media, 1st edn., 9 July 2013Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Desor, A., Maller, O., Turner, E.: Taste acceptance of sugars by human infants. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 84(3), 496–501 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schiffman, S.: Taste and smell in disease (Second of two parts). N. Engl. J. Med. 308(22), 1337–1343 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Altman, S.: The monkey and the fig: a Socratic dialogue on evolutionary themes. Am. Sci. 77, 256–263 (1989)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johns, T.: With Bitter Herbs They Shall Eat It: Chemical ecology and the origins of human diet and medicine. University of Arizona Press, Tucson (1990)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Logue, W.: The Psychology of Eating and Drinking. W.H. Freeman, New York (1986)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Friedman, K.: Conversation, Discourse, and Knowledge. She Ji J. Des. Econ. Innov. 3(2), 75–82 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gibson, J.: The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1979)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wilson, M.: Six views of embodied cognition. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 9, 625–636 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gibbs, W., Wilson, L.: Bodily action and metaphorical meaning. Style 36, 524–540 (2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Van Rompay, T., Hekkert, P., Saakes, D., Russo, B.: Grounding abstract object characteristics in embodied interactions. Acta Psychol. 119, 315–351 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Loke, L., Robertson, T.: Moving and making strange: an embodied approach to movement-based interaction design. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 20, 7 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sapporo City UniversitySapporoJapan

Personalised recommendations