Advertisement

Anthropometric Evaluation of the Classroom Desk for Middle Schools

  • Ahamed AltaboliEmail author
  • Omar Elfituri
  • Ahmed Alturkey
  • Mohammed Dogman
  • Mohammed Almagrhi
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 876)

Abstract

An anthropometric procedure was used to evaluate six dimensions of the classroom desk used in the middle education stage in Libya. The procedure uses six separate equations (one for each desk dimension) to compare each desk dimension with each student’s related anthropometric measure(s). Eight anthropometric measures were collected from 90 male students from the three middle grades from two schools in Benghazi. Three of the six evaluated desk dimensions didn’t fit students’ anthropometry. These dimensions should be modified in order to make them fit students’ anthropometry.

Keywords

School students Anthropometrics School furniture Classroom furniture Students anthropometry 

References

  1. 1.
    Altaboli, A., Nawras, N., Mahdi, A., Alzardomi, H., Alyseri, M., Alkendi, M.: Anthropometric evaluation of the design of the classroom desk for the eighth and the ninth grades of Benghazi schools. In: Goonetilleke, R., Karwowski, W. (eds.) Advances in Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors, AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 602. Springer, Cham (2018)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Parcells, C., Manfred, S., Hubbard, R.: Mismatch of classroom furniture and body dimensions, empirical findings and health implications. J. Adolesc. Health 24(4), 265–273 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gouvali, M.K., Boudolos, K.: Match between school furniture dimensions and children anthropometry. Appl. Ergon. 37(6), 765–773 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Agha, S.: School furniture match to students’ anthropometry in the Gaza Strip. Ergonomics 53(3), 344–354 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Castellucci, H.I., Arezes, P.M., Molenbroek, J.F.M.: Applying different equations to evaluate the level of mismatch between students and school furniture. Appl. Ergon. 45, 1123–1132 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Castellucci, I., Goncalves, M., Arezes, P.: Ergonomic design of school furniture: challenges for the portuguese schools. In: Vink, P., Kantola, J. (eds.) Advances in Occupational, Social, and Organizational Ergonomics, pp. 625–633. CRC Press (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    García-Acosta, G., Lange-Morales, K.: Definition of sizes for the design of school furniture for Bogotá schools based on anthropometric criteria. Ergonomics 50(10), 1626–1642 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hedge, A., Lueder, R.: Classroom furniture. In: Lueder, R., Rice, J. (eds.) Ergonomics for Children, pp. 721–751. CRC press, Taylor & Francis Group (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Macedo, A., Morais, A., Martins, F., Martins, J., Pais, S., Mayan, O.: Match between classroom dimensions and students’ anthropometry: re-equipment according to european educational furniture standard. Hum. Factors 57(1), 48–60 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Saarni, L., Nygård, C., Kaukiainen, A., Rimpelä, A.: Are the desks and chairs at school appropriate? Ergonomics 50(10), 1561–1570 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ahamed Altaboli
    • 1
    Email author
  • Omar Elfituri
    • 1
  • Ahmed Alturkey
    • 1
  • Mohammed Dogman
    • 1
  • Mohammed Almagrhi
    • 1
  1. 1.Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering DepartmentUniversity of BenghaziBenghaziLibya

Personalised recommendations