ERGO@OFFICE: A Participatory Ergonomics Approach for Strategic Interventions and Prevention of Musculoskeletal Disorders in SMEs

  • Tânia M. LimaEmail author
  • Denis A. Coelho
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 876)


Participatory ergonomics programs engage employees in preventive strategies. Ergo@Office is an integrated methodology for continuously implementing preventive measures while participatorily monitoring their effectiveness. Ergo@Office is directed towards computerized workplaces and aims identification and assessment of ergonomic risks, job psychosocial factors, musculoskeletal complaints and symptoms of disorders and individual characteristics and habits. This is followed by design and implementation of an intervention action plan. Initially, an occupational health and safety technician (HST) applies the risk factor identification methodology. The objective of the training that ensues is to capacitate and enable workers to propose an intervention plan for their work. To this follows application of suitable risk assessment methods to situations where ergonomic mismatches were detected by the HST. Finally, preventive and corrective measures to be implemented in each job, are devised in an ergonomic intervention plan for each employee. Monitoring of implemented measures enables assessing their effectiveness and their up-to-date adjustment.


MSD Psychosocial factors Individual characteristics Computerized work Occupational health and safety 



The authors were funded in part by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia project 762 UID/EMS/00151/2013 C-MAST.


  1. 1.
    INE. Empresas em Portugal 2016. Instituto Nacional de Estatística, I. P. (2016). Accessed 5 Jun 2018.
  2. 2.
    Oakman, J., de Wind, A., van den Heuvel, S.G., van der Beek, A.J.: Work characteristics predict the development of multi-site musculoskeletal pain. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 90, 653–661 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    EU-OSHA. EU-OSHA Multi-Annual Strategic Programme (MSP) 2014–2020, (EU-OSHA,Bilbao) (2013). Accessed: 5 Jun 2018.
  4. 4.
    Korpinen, L., Suuronen, N., Latva-Teikari, J., Pääkkönen, R.: A questionnaire on the health effects of new technical equipment. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 39, 105–114 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Macdonald, W., Oakman, J.: Requirements for more effective prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders. BMC Musculoskel. Dis. 16, 293 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oakman, J., Macdonald, W., Bartram, T., Keegel, T., Kinsman, N.: Workplace risk management practices to prevent musculoskeletal and mental health disorders: What are the gaps? Saf. Sci. 101, 220–230 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bao, S.S., Kapellusch, J.M., Merryweather, A.S., Thiese, M.S., Kurt, A.G., Hegmann, T., Silverstein, B.A.: Relationships between job organisational factors, biomechanical and psychosocial exposures. Ergonomics 59, 179–194 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rasmussen, C.D.N., Lindberg, N.K., Ravn, N.H., Jørgensen, M.B., Søgaard, K., Holtermann, A.: Processes, barriers and facilitators to implementation of a participatory ergonomics program among eldercare workers. Appl. Ergon. 58, 491–499 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Janwantanakul, P., Pensri, P., Jiamjarasrangsi, W., Sinsongsook, T.: The relationship between upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms attributed to work and risk factors in office workers. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 83, 273–281 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Haines, H., Wilson, J.R., Vink, P., Koningsveld, E.: Validating a framework for participatory ergonomics (the PEF). Ergonomics 45, 309–327 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wioland, L.: Ergonomic analyses within the French transport and logistics sector: first steps towards a new “act elsewhere” prevention approach. Accid. Anal. Prev. 59, 213–220 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gyi, D., Sang, K., Haslam, C.: Participatory ergonomics: co-developing interventions to reduce the risk of musculoskeletal symptoms in business drivers. Ergonomics 56, 45–58 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Morag, I., Luria, G.: A group-level approach to analyzing participative ergonomics (PE) effectiveness: The relationship between PE dimensions and employee exposure to injuries. Appl. Ergon. 68, 319–327 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Visser, S., van der Molen, H.F., Sluiter, J.K., Frings-Dresen, M.H.W.: Guidance strategies for a participatory ergonomic intervention to increase the use of ergonomic measures of workers in construction companies: a study design of a randomised trial. BMC Musculoskel. Dis. 15, 132 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Straker, L., Burgess-Limerick, R., Pollock, C., Egeskov, R.: A randomized and controlled trial of a participative ergonomics intervention to reduce injuries associated with manual tasks: physical risk and legislative compliance. Ergonomics 47, 166–188 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lima, T.M., Coelho, D.A.: Prevention of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) in office work: a case study. Work 39, 397–408 (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Silva, C., Pereira, A., Pereira, A.M., Amaral, V., Vasconcelos, G., Rodrigues, V., Silvério, J., Nossa, P.: The Portuguese version of Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire. Int. J. Behav. Med. 17, 256 (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mesquita, C.C., Ribeiro, J.C., Moreira, P.: Portuguese version of the standardized Nordic musculoskeletal questionnaire: cross cultural and reliability. J. Public Health 18, 461–466 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.C-MAST (Centre for Mechanical and Aerospace Science and Technologies), Department of Electromechanical EngineeringUniversidade da Beira Interior, Calçada Fonte do LameiroCovilhãPortugal

Personalised recommendations