Advertisement

Developing Safety Competence Process for Vocational Students

  • Sari TappuraEmail author
  • Sanna Nenonen
  • Noora Nenonen
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 876)

Abstract

In the safety-critical process industry, workplace learning during vocational education and training (VET) is essential when developing the safety competence of process operator students. Due to the Finnish VET reform, workplace learning needs to be reorganized and requires new methods. This study aims to examine the current development needs regarding the guidance of workplace learning in the process industry with respect to VET. Expert interviews (n = 12) and a workshop (16 participants) were carried out with participating organizations. The results were reviewed from the perspectives of process industry companies and VET providers. Based on the results, further actions are suggested to help companies and VET providers adapt to the new situation and process safety requirements. The results can help guide companies and VET providers toward shaping future process safety and the safety culture in the process industry.

Keywords

Process safety Process industry Vocational education and training Safety competence Workplace learning 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to sincerely thank the Finnish Work Environment Fund for the funding of this study, as well as the organizations participating in this study for their contribution.

References

  1. 1.
    Rodríguez, M., Díaz, I.: A systematic and integral hazards analysis technique applied to the process industry. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 43, 721–729 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Laberge, M., Ledoux, E.: Occupational health and safety issues affecting young workers: a literature review. Work 39(3), 215–232 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Salminen, S.: Have young workers more injuries than older ones? An international literature review. J. Saf. Res. 35(5), 513–521 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nazir, S., Sorensen, L.J., Øvergård, K.I., Manca, D.: How distributed situation awareness influences process safety. Chem. Eng. Trans. 36, 409–414 (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Rademaeker, E., Suter, G., Pasman, H.J., Fabian, B.: A review of the past, present and future of the European loss prevention and safety promotion in the process industries. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 92, 280–291 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tappura, S., Kivistö-Rahnasto, J.: Annual school safety activity calendar to promote safety in VET. In: Arezes, P.M., et al. (eds.) Occupational Safety and Hygiene VI: Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Occupation Safety and Hygiene (SHO 2018), pp. 131–135. CRC Press, London (2018)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    HE 39/2017. Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle laiksi ammatillisesta koulutuksesta ja eräiksi siihen liittyviksi laeiksi. (in Finnish)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    European Commission: High-performance apprenticeships & work-based learning: 20 guiding principles (2015). http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=1147&langId=fi&moreDocuments=yes
  9. 9.
    Mikkonen, S., Pylväs, L., Rintala, H., Nokelainen, P., Postareff, L.: Guiding workplace learning in vocational education and training: a literature review. Empir. Res. Vocat. Educ. Train. 9, 9 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fjellström, M., Kristmansson, P.: Learning as an apprentice in Sweden: a comparative study on affordances for vocational learning in school and work life apprentice education. Educ. Train. 58(6), 629–642 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Virtanen, A., Tynjälä, P., Eteläpelto, A.: Factors promoting vocational students’ learning at work: study on student experiences. J. Educ. Work 27(1), 43–70 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training: Professional development opportunities for in-company trainers: A compilation of good practices. Working paper no 6. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2010). http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/publications-and-resources/publications/6106
  13. 13.
    Dionisius, R., Muehlemann, S., Pfeifer, H., Walden, G., Wenzelmann, F., Wolter, S.C.: Cost and Benefit of Apprenticeship Training – A Comparison of Germany and Switzerland. CESifo Working Paper No. 2287. Center for Economic Studies, Munich (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    European Training Foundation: Work-Based Learning: Benefits and Obstacles - A Literature Review for Policy Makers and Social Partners in ETF Partner Countries (2013). http://www.etf.europa.eu/web.nsf/pages/Work_based_learning
  15. 15.
    Hogarth, T., Gambin, L., Winterbotham, M., Koerbitz, C., Hasluck, C., Baldauf, B.: Employer Investment in Apprenticeships and Workplace Learning: The Fifth Net Benefits to Employers Study. BIS Research Report 67. Department for Business Innovation and Skills, London (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Karlson, N., Persson, K.: Effects of work-based learning on companies involved in VET education. Ratio Working Paper No. 258. The Ratio Institute, Stockholm (2011). http://ratio.se/app/uploads/2015/09/nk_kp_work_based_learning_258.pdf
  17. 17.
    Wolter, S., Ryan, P.: Apprenticeship. In: Hanushek, E.A., Machin, S., Woessmann, L. (eds.) Handbook of the Economics of Education 3, pp. 521–576. Elsevier, North-Holland (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S.: Introduction: the discipline and practice of qualitative research. In: Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 1–19. SAGE Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tampere University of Technology, Industrial and Information ManagementTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations