Advertisement

Repairs of the Nose

  • Mark E. Burnett
  • John A. Zitelli
Chapter

Abstract

Few anatomic sites challenge the skill of a reconstructive surgeon as the nose. With preservation of airway function as a sine qua non, the surgeon must also adhere to complex aesthetic demands. Topographic complexity, limited laxity, high adnexal density, and regional variation in skin thickness combine to present a formidable challenge to restoring form and function. The conspicuity of the nose also provides little latitude for error in execution, making the slightest degree of asymmetry perceptible. Reliable operative results require a systematic reconstructive approach based on wound size, depth, anatomic location, and characteristics of adjacent skin.

Keywords

Nasal Reconstruction Nose Flaps Grafts Secondary intention 

References

  1. 1.
    Mohs FE. Chemosurgical treatment of cancer of the nose: a microscopically controlled method. Arch Surg. (Chicago, 1920). 1946;53:327–44.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.1947.01520080003001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zitelli JA. Secondary intention healing: an alternative to surgical repair. Clin Dermatol. 1984;2(3):92–106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0738-081X(84)90031-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zitelli JA. Wound healing by secondary intention. A cosmetic appraisal. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1983;9(3):407–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0190-9622(83)70150-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goldwyn RM, Rueckert F. The value of healing by secondary intention for sizeable defects of the face. Arch Surg. 1977;112(3):285–92.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1977.01370030057010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moscona R, Pnini A, Hirshowitz B. In favor of healing by secondary intention after excision of medial canthal basal cell carcinoma. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983;71(2):189–95. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6823478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Becker GD, Adams LA, Levin BC. Outcome analysis of Mohs surgery of the lip and chin: comparing secondary intention healing and surgery. Laryngoscope. 1995;105(11):1176–83.  https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-199511000-00007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Levin BC, Adams LA, Becker GD. Healing by secondary intention of auricular defects after Mohs surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122(1):59–66. discussion 67. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8554748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Becker GD, Adams LA, Levin BC. Nonsurgical repair of perinasal skin defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;88(5):768–76. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1924562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Deutsch BD, Becker FF. Secondary healing of Mohs defects of the forehead, temple, and lower eyelid. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123(5):529–34. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9158402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bernstein G. Healing by secondary intention. Dermatol Clin. 1989;7(1):645–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1043-1810(10)80107-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    van der Eerden PA, Lohuis PJ, Hart AA, Mulder WC, Vuyk H. Secondary intention healing after excision of nonmelanoma skin cancer of the head and neck: statistical evaluation of prognostic values of wound characteristics and final cosmetic results. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122(6):1747–55.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31818a9aaa.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yeh J-M, Ou C-Y, Lee JY-Y, Wong T-W. Secondary intention healing with satisfactory outcome after nodular basal cell carcinoma excision on the face. Dermatologica Sin. 2013;31(2):68–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsi.2012.07.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mott KJ, Clark DP, Stelljes LS. Regional variation in wound contraction of mohs surgery defects allowed to heal by second intention. Dermatologic Surg. 2003;29(7):712–22.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-4725.2003.29180.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zitelli JA, Fazio MJ. Reconstruction of the nose with local flaps. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1991;17(2):184–189. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2002164. Accessed 16 Oct 2016.
  15. 15.
    Singer AJ, Clark RA. Cutaneous wound healing. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(10):738–46.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199909023411006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yamaguchi Y, Yoshikawa K. Cutaneous wound healing: an update. J Dermatol. 2001;28(10):521–34. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11732719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cook J, Zitelli JA. Primary closure for midline defects of the nose: a simple approach for reconstruction. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;43(3):508–10.  https://doi.org/10.1067/mjd.2000.106508.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zitelli JA. The bilobed flap for nasal reconstruction. Arch Dermatol. 1989;125(7):957–59. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2742390. Accessed 16 Oct 2016.
  19. 19.
    Zitelli JA. The nasolabial flap as a single-stage procedure. Arch Dermatol. 1990;126(11):1445–8.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.1990.01670350059007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stigall L, Zitelli J. Reconstructing the nasal tip. Br J Dermatol. 2014;171:23–8.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.13208.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rohrich RJ, Griffin JR, Ansari M, Beran SJ, Potter JK. Nasal reconstruction – beyond aesthetic subunits: a 15-year review of 1334 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114(6):1405–16.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000138596.57393.05.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rohrer TE, Dzubow LM. Conchal bowl skin grafting in nasal tip reconstruction: clinical and histologic evaluation. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995;33(3):476–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0190-9622(95)91394-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chester EC. Surgical gem. The use of dog-ears as grafts. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1981;7(12):956–9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7338584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zitelli JA. Burow’s grafts. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1987;17(2 Pt 1):271–79. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3305605. Accessed 16 Oct 2016.
  25. 25.
    Lee KK, Mehrany K, Swanson NA. Fusiform elliptical Burow’s graft: a simple and practical esthetic approach for nasal tip reconstruction. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32(1):91–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chester EC. Closure of a surgical defect in a nose using island grafts from the nose. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1982;8(9):790–1. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6752229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Burget GC, Menick FJ. Repair of small surface defects. In: Burget GC, Menick FJ, editors. Aesthetic reconstruction of the nose. St. Louis: Mosby; 1994. p. 117–56.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jung DH, Medikeri GS, Chang G-U, Hyun SM. Surgical techniques for the correction of postrhinoplasty depressed scars on the nasal tip. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 17(6):405–12.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2015.0911.
  29. 29.
    Cook JL. Reconstructive utility of the bilobed flap: lessons from flap successes and failures. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31(8 Pt 2):1024–33. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16042926PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Uzun H, Bitik O, Kamburoğlu HO, Dadaci M, Çaliş M, Öcal E. Assessment of patients who underwent nasal reconstruction after non-melanoma skin cancer excision. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26(4):1299–303.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000001563.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Konofaos P, Alvarez S, McKinnie JE, Wallace RD. Nasal reconstruction: a simplified approach based on 419 operated cases. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2015;39(1):91–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-014-0417-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jellinek NJ, Cordova KB. Bilobed flap for reconstruction of small alar rim defects. Dermatol Surg. 2013;39(4):649–52.  https://doi.org/10.1111/dsu.12055.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Salgarelli AC, Cangiano A, Sartorelli F, Bellini P, Collini M. The bilobed flap in skin cancer of the face: our experience on 285 cases. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2010;38(6):460–4.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2009.10.022.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Moy RL, Grossfeld JS, Baum M, Rivlin D, Eremia S. Reconstruction of the nose utilizing a bilobed flap. Int J Dermatol. 1994;33(9):657–60. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8002169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zitelli JA. Design aspect of the bilobed flap. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 10(3):186.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.10.3.186.
  36. 36.
    Zoumalan RA, Hazan C, Levine VJ, Shah AR. Analysis of vector alignment with the Zitelli bilobed flap for nasal defect repair: a comparison of flap dynamics in human cadavers. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 10(3):181–5.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.10.3.181.
  37. 37.
    Rieger RA. A local flap for repair of the nasal tip. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1967;40(2):147–9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=5340490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Eren E, Beden V. Beyond Rieger’s original indication; the dorsal nasal flap revisited. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014;42(5):412–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2013.05.031.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Johnson TM, Swanson NA, Baker SR, Brown MD, Nelson BR. The Rieger flap for nasal reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;121(6):634–7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7772314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rohrich RJ, Muzaffar AR, Adams WP, Hollier LH. The aesthetic unit dorsal nasal flap: rationale for avoiding a glabellar incision. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104(5):1289–94. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10513908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wentzell JM. Dorsal nasal flap for reconstruction of full-thickness defects of the nose. Dermatol Surg. 2010;36(7):1171–8.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2010.01603.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bitgood MJ, Hybarger CP. Expanded applications of the dorsal nasal flap. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 9(5):344–51.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.9.5.344.
  43. 43.
    Rigg BM. The dorsal nasal flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1973;52(4):361–4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4582523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Fliss DM, Freeman JL. The nasal glabellar flap. J Otolaryngol. 1994;23(1):6–7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8170023PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rohrich RJ, Muzaffar AR, Adams WP, Hollier LH. The aesthetic unit dorsal nasal flap: rationale for avoiding a glabellar incision. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104(5):1289–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zimbler MS, Thomas JR. The dorsal nasal flap revisited: aesthetic refinements in nasal reconstruction. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2(4):285–6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11074726
  47. 47.
    Burget GC, Menick FJ. The subunit principle in nasal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;76(2):239–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Shumrick KA, Smith TL. The anatomic basis for the design of forehead flaps in nasal reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992;118(4):373–9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1554465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Reece EM, Schaverien M, Rohrich RJ. The paramedian forehead flap: a dynamic anatomical vascular study verifying safety and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(6):1956–63.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181707109.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Stigall LE, Bramlette TB, Zitelli JA, Brodland DG. The paramidline forehead flap: a clinical and microanatomic study. Dermatol Surg. 2016;42(6):764–71.  https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000722.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Neuhaus IM, Yu SS. Second-intention healing of nasal alar defects. Dermatologic Surg. 2012;38(4):697–702.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02233.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Arden RL, Nawroz-Danish M, Yoo GH, Meleca RJ, Burgio DL. Nasal alar reconstruction: a critical analysis using melolabial island and paramedian forehead flaps. Laryngoscope. 1999;109(3):376–82. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10089961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Paddack AC, Frank RW, Spencer HJ, Key JM, Vural E. Outcomes of paramedian forehead and nasolabial interpolation flaps in nasal reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;138(4):367–71.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archoto.2012.69.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Spear SL, Kroll SS, Romm S. A new twist to the nasolabial flap for reconstruction of lateral alar defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987;79(6):915–20. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3588730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Lindsey WH. Reliability of the melolabial flap for alar reconstruction. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2017;3:33–7.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ezzat WH, Liu SW. Comparative study of functional nasal reconstruction using structural reinforcement. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017;2118:1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2017.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Dixon AJ, Dixon MP, Dixon JB. Prospective study of long-term patient perceptions of their skin cancer surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;57(3):445–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2007.02.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark E. Burnett
    • 1
  • John A. Zitelli
    • 2
  1. 1.UPMC Shadyside, Zitelli & Brodland, PCPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.University of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations