Advertisement

Introduction

  • Franziska DübgenEmail author
  • Stefan Skupien
Chapter
Part of the Global Political Thinkers book series (GPT)

Abstract

Approaching African philosophy from the perspective of the Beninese philosopher Paulin Hountondji has the advantage of elucidating the internal debates of what constitutes African philosophy and of transcending these local debates towards a critical universalism. Hountondji’s focus on philosophy as a form of a responsible, individual and rigorous critique offers to keep a distance from homogenising culturalist assumptions that influenced earlier as well as contemporary philosophical debates and political arguments. His rich work invites us to reassess the debate on ethnophilosophy, to re-appropriate marginalised local knowledge, to thereby critically assess global scientific production, to discuss identity politics and cultural relativism, and hence to contribute to a shared horizon of understanding the globally entangled world.

Keywords

African philosophy Ethnophilosophy Professional philosophy Endogenous research Universalism 

References

  1. Hountondji, P. J. (2017). Construire l’universel: un défi transculturel. African Review of Social Science Methodology, 2(1–2), 155–168.Google Scholar
  2. Nzegwu, N. U. (2006). Family Matters: Feminist Concepts in African Philosophy of Culture. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  3. Oruka, H. O. (1981). Four Trends in Current African Philosophy. In A. Diemer (Ed.), Symposium on Philosophy and the Present Situation of Africa (pp. 1–7). Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
  4. Oruka, H. O. (1990). Sage Philosophy: Indigenous Thinkers and Modern Debate on African Philosophy. Amsterdam: Brill.Google Scholar
  5. Serequeberhan, T. (1994). The Hermeneutics of African Philosophy: Horizon and Discourse. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. du Toit, L., & Coetzee, A. (2017). Gendering African Philosophy, or: African Feminism as Decolonizing Force. In A. Afolayan & T. Falola (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of African Philosophy (pp. 333–347). New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MünsterMünsterGermany
  2. 2.WZB Berlin Social Science CenterBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations