Advertisement

How Does Matter Matter in Preschool Science?

  • Sofie AreljungEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Cultural Studies of Science Education book series (CSSE, volume 18)

Abstract

This chapter examines science practices in Swedish preschools (school form for children aged 1–5 years) in relation to three central themes in Karen Barad’s agential realism: “non-human bodies as active agents”, “intra-action” and “phenomena before things”. Drawing on empirical material from my work with four preschools and one pedagogical development centre, I discuss how evening out hierarchies between human and non-human bodies could affect our thoughts about, and organisation of, science education in preschool. One example in the chapter shows how Barad’s idea of regarding phenomena as the smallest onto-epistemological entity relates to teachers’ using everyday verbs to identify physical phenomena and chemical processes in children’s interplay with the surrounding world. I argue that shifting perspectives from viewing science learning as learning about the material world to learning together with the material world has the potential to empower teachers since it means that science knowledge is not detached from them but is embodied and personal. Evening out hierarchies between the human and non-human does not necessarily change views on science education in one sense – the physical world still in the centre – but in another sense, it does, as teachers and children are entangled with the knowledges produced.

References

  1. Areljung, S. (2016). Science verbs as a tool for investigating scientific phenomena – A pedagogical idea emerging from practitioner-researcher collaboration. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 12(2), 235–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3), 801–831.  https://doi.org/10.1086/345321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. de Freitas, E., & Palmer, A. (2016). How scientific concepts come to matter in early childhood curriculum: Rethinking the concept of force. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(4), 1201–1222.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9652-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Duhn, I. (2012). Places for pedagogies, pedagogies for places. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 13(2), 99–107.  https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2012.13.2.99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hultman, K. (2011). Barn, linjaler och andra aktörer. PhD thesis. Stockholm: Stockholm University.Google Scholar
  7. Hultman, K., & Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Challenging anthropocentric analysis of visual data: A relational materialist methodological approach to educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5), 525–542.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2010.500628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Højgaard, L., Juelskjær, M., & Søndergaard, D. M. (2012). The ‘what of’ and the ‘what if’ of agential realism - in search of the gendered subject. Kvinder, Koen og Forskning, 21(1–2), 38–49.Google Scholar
  9. Klaar, S., & Öhman, J. (2012). Action with friction: A transactional approach to toddlers’ physical meaning making of natural phenomena and processes in preschool. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 20(3), 439–454.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2012.704765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lenz Taguchi, H. (2011). Investigating learning, participation and becoming in early childhood practices with a relational materialist approach. Global Studies of Childhood, 1(1), 36–50.  https://doi.org/10.2304/gsch.2011.1.1.36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lenz Taguchi, H. (2012). Pedagogisk dokumentation som aktiv agent: introduktion till intra-aktiv pedagogik (1. uppl. ed.). Malmö: Gleerups utbildning.Google Scholar
  12. Nordin-Hultman, E. (2004). Pedagogiska miljöer och barns subjektskapande. PhD thesis. Stockholm: Stockholm University.Google Scholar
  13. Osgood, J., & Red Ruby Scarlet/Miriam Giugni, J. (2015). Putting posthumanist theory to work to reconfigure gender in early childhood: When theory becomes method becomes art. Global Studies of Childhood, 5(3), 346–360.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2043610615597160 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (2012). Acting with the clock: Clocking practices in early childhood. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 13(2), 154–160.  https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2012.13.2.154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rautio, P. (2013). Children who carry stones in their pockets: On autotelic material practices in everyday life. Children’s Geographies, 11(4), 394–408.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2013.812278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Siry, C., & Max, C. (2013). The Collective construction of a science unit: Framing curricula as emergent from kindergarteners’ wonderings. Science Education, 97(6), 878–902.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sundberg, B., Areljung, S., Due, K., Ekström, K., Ottander, C., & Tellgren, B. (2015). Understanding preschool emergent science in a cultural historical context through Activity Theory. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2014.978557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Taylor, A., Pacini-Ketchabaw, V., & Blaise, M. (2012). Children’s relations to the more-than-human world. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 13(2), 81–85.  https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2012.13.2.81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Taylor, C. A. (2013). Objects, bodies and space: Gender and embodied practices of mattering in the classroom. Gender and Education, 25(6), 688–703.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2013.834864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Umeå UniversityUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations