Advertisement

Using Spacetimemattering to Engage Science Education with Matter and Material Feminism

  • Kathryn ScantleburyEmail author
  • Anna T. Danielsson
  • Anita Hussénius
  • Annica Gullberg
  • Kristina Andersson
Chapter
Part of the Cultural Studies of Science Education book series (CSSE, volume 18)

Abstract

Material feminism is producing new knowledge about humans’ engagement with the natural and physical world, the agentic nature of matter and the sociocultural context, and the entanglement of the material, such as bodies and learning spaces and time. This chapter utilizes Barad’s concept of spacetimemattering to reintroduce matter/materiality into science education. Spacetimemattering are forces in producing material-cultural worlds through the intra-actions between human and nonhuman (matter) that also recognizes that time is entangled with space and matter (Barad K: Meeting the universe halfway: quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press, Durham, NC, 2007). By “cutting together-apart” a preservice teacher’s material moments in science, we will discuss how the enfolding of spacetimemattering provides opportunities for the production of new material-discursive practices that may generate positive responses from students to science experiences.

References

  1. Barad, K. (2000). Reconceiving scientific literacy as agential literacy: Or learning how to intra-act responsibly within the world. In R. Reid & S. Traweek (Eds.), Doing science + culture (pp. 221–258). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3), 801–831.  https://doi.org/10.1086/345321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822388128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barad, K. (2014). Diffracting diffraction: Cutting together-apart. Parallax, 20(3), 168–187.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2014.927623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bazzul, J. (2012). Neoliberal ideology, global capitalism, and science education: Engaging the question of subjectivity. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7(4), 1001–1020.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9413-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Danielsson, A., Andersson, K., Gullberg, A., Hussenius, A., & Scantlebury, K. (2015). “In biology class we would just sit indoors”: Experiences of insideness and outsideness in the places student teachers’ associate with science. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11, 1115.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9702-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Haraway, D. (1997). Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium.FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hekman, S. (2010). Material of knowledge: Feminist disclosures. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hekman, S. (2014). The feminine subject. New York: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hussénius, A., Scantlebury, K., Andersson, K., & Gullberg, A. (2013). Ignoring half the sky: A feminist perspective on the missing standpoints in science education research. In N. Mansour & R. Wegerif (Eds.), Science education for diversity in knowledge society (pp. 301–315). New York: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4563-6_14. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ivinson, G. (2012). The body and pedagogy: Beyond absent, moving bodies in pedagogic practice. British Journal of Sociology of Education 33(4), 489–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lemke, J. (2011). The secret identity of science education: Masculine and politically conservative? Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6, 287–292.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-011-9326-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lykke, N. (2010). Feminist studies: A guide to intersectional theory, methodology and writing. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Mazzei, L. A. (2013). Materialist mappings of knowing in being: Researchers constituted in the production of knowledge. Gender and Education, 25(6), 776–785.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2013.824072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rouse, J. (2008). Barad’s feminist naturalism. Hypatia, 19(1), 142–161.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2004.tb01272.x. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Taylor, C. A. (2013). Objects, bodies and space: Gender and embodied practices of mattering in the classroom. Gender and Education, 25(6), 688–703.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2013.834864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Taylor, C. A., & Ivinson, G. (2013). Material feminisms: New directions for education. Gender and Education, 25(6), 665–670.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2013.834617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathryn Scantlebury
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anna T. Danielsson
    • 2
  • Anita Hussénius
    • 2
  • Annica Gullberg
    • 3
  • Kristina Andersson
    • 2
  1. 1.University of DelawareNewarkUSA
  2. 2.Uppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  3. 3.Örebro UniversityÖrebroSweden

Personalised recommendations