Advertisement

From Lab to Lecture? Science Teachers’ Experiences Translating Materiality in Lab-Based Research Experiences into Classroom Practice

  • Nancy P. MorabitoEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Cultural Studies of Science Education book series (CSSE, volume 18)

Abstract

In this chapter I present a comparison of three teachers’ experiences with materiality through laboratory research during a summer professional development program aimed at engaging middle and high school teachers in authentic engineering research experiences. This professional development program provided teachers’ entrance into “science and technology…through the back door of science in the making, not through the more grandiose entrance of ready made science” (Latour, 1987, p. 4, emphasis added) and, consequently, granted direct access to the material phenomena with which scientists and engineers work. Therefore, I explore teachers’ experiences with agential intra-action (Barad, 2003) in these settings, as well as the extent to which the teachers translated such experiences into their own classroom teaching.

References

  1. Barad, K. (1998). Getting real: Technoscientific practices and the materialization of reality. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 10(2), 87–128.Google Scholar
  2. Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/345321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Giere, R. (2002). Scientific cognition as distributed cognition. In P. Carruthers, S. Stich, & M. Siegel (Eds.), The cognitive basis of science (pp. 285–299). New York: Cambridge University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613517.016.
  4. Hutchins, E. (1996). Learning to navigate. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: perspectives on activity and context (pp. 35–63). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Milne, C. (2015). Beyond the actual: Exploring constructs of reality, knowledge and culture in virtual environments. In C. Milne, K. Tobin, & D. DeGennaro (Eds.), Sociocultural studies and implications for science education: The experiential and the virtual (pp. 315–326). New York: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4240-6_16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. National Science Foundation. (2007). Research experiences for teachers (RET) in engineering synopsis. Retrieved March 26, 2009, from http://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=5736&org=NSF&sel_org=NSF&from=fund
  9. NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  10. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  11. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.St. John’s UniversityQueensUSA

Personalised recommendations