Advertisement

Preliminary Usability and Efficacy Tests in Neurological Patients of an Exoskeleton for Upper-Limb Weight Support

  • M. Caimmi
  • I. Carpinella
  • R. Di Giovanni
  • D. Ellena
  • L. Molinari Tosatti
  • D. Cattaneo
  • M. Ferrarin
  • C. Solaro
Conference paper
Part of the Biosystems & Biorobotics book series (BIOSYSROB, volume 22)

Abstract

Upper-limb paresis is a main disabling condition in stroke and neurological diseases and rehabilitation is essential for recovering/maintaining function. Upper-limb weight support may help/enable these patients performing movements against gravity thus allowing for task oriented interventions. In this framework, an exoskeleton for upper-limb weight support was developed. In this preliminary study the system was tested in a small group of neurological patients (N = 12) to verify the overall usability and its efficacy in assisting patients during functional movements against gravity. Patients performed some functional tasks of the ARAT test both with and without the exoskeleton. The system seems effective as it enabled even the most impaired patients performing the tasks. All patients could wear the exoskeleton and complete the tasks. Usability of the system was assessed as adequate for a use inside a clinical study. Future work will focus on verifying the efficacy of task-oriented intervention performed using the exoskeleton.

References

  1. 1.
    Millan, M., Davalos, A.: The need for new therapies for acute ischemic stroke. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 22(Suppl 1), 3–9 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bertoni, R., Lamers, I., Chen, C., Feys, P., Cattaneo, D.: Unilateral and bilateral upper limb dysfunction at body functions, activity and participation levels in people with MS. Mult. Scler. 21(12), 1566 (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Taveggia, G., Borboni, A., Salvi, L., et al.: Efficacy of robot-assisted rehab for the functional recovery of the upper limb in post-stroke patients: a randomized controlled study. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 52, 767 (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gijbels, D., Lamers, I., Kerkhofs, L., Alders, G., Knippenberg, E., Feys, P.: The Armeo Spring as training tool to improve upper limb functionality in multiple sclerosis: a pilot study. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 8, 5 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Choi, Y., Gordon, J., Park, H., Schweighofer, N.: Feasibility of the adaptive and automatic presentation of tasks system for rehabilitation of upper extremity function post-stroke. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 8, 42 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carpinella, I., Cattaneo, D., Bertoni, R., Ferrarin, M.: Robot training of upper limb in multiple sclerosis: comparing protocols with or without manipulative task. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 20, 351 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Scano, A., Spagnuolo, G., Caimmi, M., Chiavenna, A., Malosio, M., Legnani, G., Tosatti, L.M.: Static and dynamic characterization of the LIGHTarm exoskeleton for rehabilitation. In: IEEE ICORR (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Spagnuolo, G., Malosio, M., Scano, A., Caimmi, M., Legnani, G., et al.: Passive and active gravity-compensation of LIGHTarm, an exoskeleton for the upper-limb rehabilitation. In: IEEE ICORR (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carroll, D.: A quantitative test of upper extremity function. J. Chronic Dis. 18, 479–491 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pérez, R., Costa, Ú., Torrent, M., Solana, J., Opisso, E., et al.: Upper limb portable motion analysis system based on inertial technology for neurorehabilitation purposes. Sensors (Basel) 10, 10733–10751 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brooke, J.: SUS: a “quick and dirty” usability scale”. In: Jordan, P.W., Thomas, B., Weerdmeester, B.A., McClelland, A.L. (eds.) Usability Evaluation In Industry (1996)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Caimmi
    • 1
  • I. Carpinella
    • 2
  • R. Di Giovanni
    • 3
  • D. Ellena
    • 3
  • L. Molinari Tosatti
    • 1
  • D. Cattaneo
    • 2
  • M. Ferrarin
    • 2
  • C. Solaro
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Industrial Technologies and AutomationItalian National Research CouncilRomeItaly
  2. 2.Don Carlo Gnocchi FoundationMilanItaly
  3. 3.C.R.R.F. Monsignor Luigi NovareseMoncrivelloItaly

Personalised recommendations