Advertisement

Threshold Discounting: Operational Benefits, Potential Drawbacks, and Optimal Design

  • Simone MarinesiEmail author
  • Karan Girotra
  • Serguei Netessine
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series in Supply Chain Management book series (SSSCM, volume 6)

Abstract

We study the use of threshold discounting, the practice of offering service at a discounted price only if at least a given number of customers show interest in it, pioneered by Groupon. We model a capacity-constrained firm offering service to a random-sized population of strategic customers in two representative time periods, a desirable hot period and a less desirable slow period. A comparison with the traditional approach typically employed in such circumstances (slow period discounting or closing) reveals that threshold discounting boosts the firm’s operational performance on account of two advantages. First, the contingent discount incentivizes slow period consumption when the market for the service is large and reduces supply of the service when the market is small, allowing the firm to respond to the service’s unobserved market potential. Second, activation of the threshold discount signals the market size to strategic customers, supplying them with information on service availability, and inducing them into self-selecting the consumption period to one that improves the firm’s capacity utilization and profit. Unlike typical settings with strategic customers, their strategicbehavior in our setting increases the firm’s profits. When threshold discounts are offered through an intermediary, arrangements often used in practice distort the incentives of the intermediary, and typically result in a higher discount and a lower activation threshold relative to what would be optimal for the service firm. We consider alternate deal designs, and we find that the best designs compromise the service provider’s flexibility in order to provide customers with clear offer terms.

References

  1. Anand KS, Aron R (2003) Group buying on the web: a comparison of price-discovery mechanisms. Manag Sci 49(11):1546–1562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aviv Y, Pazgal A (2008) Optimal pricing of seasonal products in the presence of forward-looking consumers. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 10(3):339–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyacı T, Özer Ö (2010) Information acquisition for capacity planning via pricing and advance selling: when to stop and act? Oper Res 58(5):1328–1349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cachon GP, Swinney R (2009) Purchasing, pricing, and quick response in the presence of strategic consumers. Manag Sci 55(3):497–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cachon GP, Swinney R (2011) The value of fast fashion: quick response, enhanced design, and strategic consumer behavior. Manag Sci 57(4):778–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen Y, Zhang T (2014) Interpersonal bundling. Manag Sci 61(6):1456–1471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen J, Chen X, Song X (2007) Comparison of the group-buying auction and the fixed pricing mechanism. Decis Support Syst 43(2):445–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chun SY, Ovchinnikov A (2017) Strategic consumers, revenue management, and the design of loyalty programs. Research paper No. 2606791, Georgetown McDonough School of BusinessGoogle Scholar
  9. Coase RH (1972) Durability and monopoly. J Law Econ 15:143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crew MA, Fernando CS, Kleindorfer PR (1995) The theory of peak-load pricing: a survey. J Regul Econ 8(3):215–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dana JD Jr (1999) Equilibrium price dispersion under demand uncertainty: the roles of costly capacity and market structure. RAND J Econ 30(4):632–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deneckere R, Peck J (1995) Competition over price and service rate when demand is stochastic: a strategic analysis. RAND J Econ 26(1):148–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Edelman B, Jaffe S, Kominers SD (2016) To Groupon or not to Groupon: the profitability of deep discounts. Mark Lett 27(1):39–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1991) Game theory. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Hu M, Shi M, Wu J (2013) Simultaneous vs. sequential group-buying mechanisms. Manag Sci 59(12):2805–2822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jing X, Xie J (2011) Group buying: a new mechanism for selling through social interactions. Manag Sci 57(8):1354–1372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li X, Wu L (2018, Forthcoming) Herding and social media word-of-mouth: evidence from Groupon. MIS QGoogle Scholar
  18. Li J, Granados N, Netessine S (2014) Are consumers strategic? Structural estimation from the air-travel industry. Manag Sci 60(9):2114–2137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu Q, van Ryzin GJ (2008) Strategic capacity rationing to induce early purchases. Manag Sci 54(6):1115–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lus B, Muriel A (2009) Measuring the impact of increased product substitution on pricing and capacity decisions under linear demand models. Prod Oper Manag 18(1):95–113Google Scholar
  21. Marinesi S, Girotra K (2013) Information acquisition through customer voting systems. Working paper No. 2013/99/TOM, INSEADGoogle Scholar
  22. Marinesi S, Girotra K, Netessine S (2017) The operational advantages of threshold discounting offers. Manag Sci. Articles in Advance. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2740 Google Scholar
  23. Netessine S, Tang CS (2009) Consumer-driven demand and operations management models: a systematic study of information-technology-enabled sales mechanisms, vol 131. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Schelling T (1960) The strategy of conflict. Harvard University, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. Su X (2007) Intertemporal pricing with strategic customer behavior. Manag Sci 53(5):726–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Su X, Zhang F (2008) Strategic customer behavior, commitment, and supply chain performance. Manag Sci 54(10):1759–1773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Talluri KT, Van Ryzin GJ (2006) The theory and practice of revenue management, vol 68. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Wu J, Shi M, Hu M (2014) Threshold effects in online group buying. Manag Sci 61(9):2025–2040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yin R, Aviv Y, Pazgal A, Tang CS (2009) Optimal markdown pricing: implications of inventory display formats in the presence of strategic customers. Manag Sci 55(8):1391–1408CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simone Marinesi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Karan Girotra
    • 2
  • Serguei Netessine
    • 1
  1. 1.The Wharton SchoolUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Cornell TechNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations