Applying Fuzzy Computing Methods for On-line Monitoring of New Generation Network Elements

  • Igor KotenkoEmail author
  • Igor Saenko
  • Sergey Ageev
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 874)


New generation networks belong to the class of big sophisticated heterogeneous hierarchical geographically distributed systems. Their functional characteristics, defining reliability, are the main characteristics which provide the application of these networks for their intended purpose. The paper offers the method of on-line functional monitoring of technical states of the new generation network elements based on application of a hierarchical fuzzy logical inference. The method and the generalized algorithm of on-line functional monitoring of technical states are developed. For realization of the offered method, the technology of intelligent agents is used. The functional structure of the intelligent agent is offered. The order of its interaction with a network element is considered. Results of modeling have shown a high efficiency of the offered approach. The possibility of the hardware-software realization of the offered method and algorithm a near real time mode is shown.


New generation network Situation network Monitoring Fuzzy logical inference 



This work was partially supported by grants of RFBR (projects No. 16-29-09482, 18-07-01369, 18-07-01488), by the budget (the project No. AAAA-A16-116033110102-5), and by Government of Russian Federation (Grant 08-08).


  1. 1.
    ITU-T: General principles and general reference model for next generation networks. Recommendation Y.2011, Geneva (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    RFC 1450: Management information base for version 2 of the simple network management protocol (SNMP v2). IETF (1993)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Black, U.: Network Management Standards: SNMP, CMIP, TMN, MIBs and Objects Libraries. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York City (1995)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saenko, I., Ageev, S., Kotenko, I.: Detection of traffic anomalies in multi-service networks based on a fuzzy logical inference. In: Intelligent Distributed Computing X. Studies in Computational Intelligence. Proceedings of 10th International Symposium on Intelligent Distributed Computing - IDC’2016, vol. 678, pp. 79–88. Springer International Publishing (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mamdani, E., Efstathion, H.: Higher-order logics for handling uncertainty in expert systems. Int. Man-Mach. Stud. 3, 243–259 (1985)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mamdani, E., Assilian, S.: An experiment in linguistic syntheses with fuzzy logic controller. Int. Man-Mach. Stud. 7(1), 1–13 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stallings, W.: SNMP, SNMP v2, SNMP v3 and RMON 1 and 2, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harrington, D., Presuhn, R., Wijnen, B.: An architecture for describing SNMP management frameworks. IETF (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goel, A.L.: Software reliability models: assumptions, limitations, and applicability. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. SE-11(12), 1411–1423 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang-Shen, R., McKeown, N.: Guaranteeing quality of service to peering traffic. In: Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM 2008), pp. 1472–1480 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang, J., Leung, Y.: Improved possibilistic c-means clustering algorithms. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 12, 209–217 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yager, R., Filev, D.: Essentials of Fuzzy Modeling and Control. Wiley, Hoboken (1984)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Azruddin, A., Gobithasan, R., Rahmat, B., Azman, S., Sureswaran, R.: A hybrid rule based fuzzy-neural expert system for passive network monitoring. In: Proceedings of the Arab Conference on Information Technology (ACIT), pp. 746–752 (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Souza, L., Barreto, G.: Nonlinear system identification using local ARX models based on the self-organizing map. Learn. Nonlinear Models - Rev. Soc. Bras. Redes Neurais (SBRN) 4(2), 112–123 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kasabov, N., Song, Q.: DENFIS: dynamic evolving neuro-fuzzy inference system and its application for time-series prediction. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 10(2), 144–154 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kotenko, I., Saenko, I., Ageev, S.: Countermeasure security risks management in the internet of things based on fuzzy logic inference. In: Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom-2015), 20–22 August 2015, Helsinki, Finland, p. 655–659 (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nikolaev, A.B., Sapego, Yu.S, Jakubovich, A.N., Bernerb, L.I., Stroganovc, V.Yu.: Fuzzy algorithm for the detection of incidents in the transport system. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Educ. 11(16), 9039–9059 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.St. Petersburg Institute for Informatics and Automation of the Russian Academy of Sciences (SPIIRAS)Saint-PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.St. Petersburg National Research University of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics (ITMO University)Saint-PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations