Advertisement

Capitalize on the Experience of the ATHENA Project for Cultural Heritage for the Eratosthenes Centre of Excellence for the Benefit of the East Med Region

  • Diofantos G. Hadjimitsis
  • Kyriacos ThemistocleousEmail author
  • Evagoras Evagorou
  • Silas Michaelides
  • Andreas Christofe
  • Argyro Nisantzi
  • Kyriacos Neocleous
  • Christiana Papoutsa
  • Christodoulos Mettas
  • Marios Tzouvaras
  • Eleni Loulli
  • Georgia Kouta
  • Chris Danezis
  • Rosa Lasaponara
  • Nicola Masini
  • Daniele Cerra
  • Gunter Schreier
  • George Papadavid
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11196)

Abstract

The “ATHENA” H2020 Twinning project seeks to establish a Center of Excellence in the field of Remote Sensing for Cultural Heritage through the development of an enhanced knowledge base and innovative methods in the areas of Archaeology and Cultural Heritage. This paper presents an overview of the ATHENA twinning project as well a review of the remote sensing in archaeology. The ATHENA stakeholder hub is presented through a WEBGIS platform. The importance of capitalizing on the experience of running the ATHENA project for the benefit of the ERATOSTHENES Centre of Excellence (ECoE) is explained. In recent years, Earth Observation (EO) techniques have been used extensively for archaeological and cultural heritage applications, which makes the ECoE a key player in EO activities in the Eastern Meditteranean region. The different areas that are under the umbrella of the remote sensing in archaeology sector are categorized based on the review findings. Finally, how Earth observation and remote sensing is spread out through research activities in the Eastern Meditteranean region from 1998 to 2018 is presented based on the Scopus engine.

Keywords

Remote sensing Copernicus Athena centre for cultural heritage Excelsior ECoE 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The present paper is under the “ATHENA” project H2020-TWINN2015 of European Commission. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 691936 (www.athena2020.eu). The authors also acknowledge the EXCELSIOR (ERATOSTHENES: Excellence Research Centre for Earth Surveillance and Space-Based Monitoring of the Environment) project which is funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, under grant agreement No 7633643: Work programme H2020 under “Spreading Excellence and Widening Participation”, call: H2020-WIDESPREAD-04-2017: TeamingPhase1 (Coordination and Support Action) (www.excelsior2020.eu).

References

  1. 1.
    Lasaponara, R., Leucci, G., Masini, N., Persico, R., Scardozzi, G.: Towards an operative use of remote sensing for exploring the past using satellite data: the case study of Hierapolis (Turkey). Remote Sens. Environ. 174, 148–164 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen, F., Lasaponara, R., Masini, N.: An overview of satellite synthetic aperture radar remote sensing in archaeology: from site detection to monitoring. J. Cult. Herit. 23, 5–11 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Themistocleous, K., Agapiou, A., King, H.M., King, N., Hadjimitsis, D.G.: More than a flight: the extensive contributions of UAV flights to archaeological research – the case study of curium site in Cyprus. In: Ioannides, M., Magnenat-Thalmann, N., Fink, E., Žarnić, R., Yen, A.-Y., Quak, E. (eds.) EuroMed 2014. LNCS, vol. 8740, pp. 396–409. Springer, Cham (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13695-0_38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Damian, H., et al.: Uncovering archaeological landscapes at Angkor using lidar. Uncovering Archaeol. Landsc. Angkor Using Lidar Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110(31), 12595–12600 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1306539110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Agapiou, A., Alexakis, D.D., Sarris, A., Hadjimitsis, D.A.: Orthogonal equations of multi-spectral satellite imagery for the identification of un-excavated archaeological sites. Remote Sens. 5, 6560–6586 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Linford, N.: The application of geophysical methods to archaeological prospection. Rep. Prog. Phys. 69, 2205–2257 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Neubauer, W.: Magnetische Prospektion in der Archäologie. Verlag der OsterreichischenAkademie der Wissenschaften, Wien (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elfadaly, A., Attia, W., Lasaponara, R.: Monitoring the environmental risks around Medinet Habu and Ramesseum Temple at West Luxor, Egypt, Using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques. J. Archaeol. Method Theory 25(2), 587–610 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Agapiou, A., Hadjimitsis, D.G., Themistocleous, K., Papadavid, G., Toulios, L.: Detection of archaeological crop marks in Cyprus using vegetation indices from Landsat TM/ETM+ satellite images and field spectroscopy measurements. In: Proceedings of SPIE 7831, Earth Resources and Environmental Remote Sensing/GIS Applications, p. 78310V, 25 October 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bini, M., et al.: Identification of leveled archeological mounds (Höyük) in the Alluvial Plain of the Ceyhan River (Southern Turkey) by satellite remote-sensing analyses. Remote Sens. 10, 241 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hadjimitsis, D., et al.: Establishing a remote sensing science center in Cyprus: first year of activities of ATHENA project. In: 6th International Euro-Mediterranean Conference (EuroMed 2016), 31 October–05 November 2016, Nicosia, Cyprus (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Diofantos, G., et al.: Proceedings of SPIE 10428, Earth Resources and Environmental Remote Sensing/GIS Applications VIII, p. 104280F, 5 October 2017 (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lasaponara, R., Masini, N.: Space-based identification of archaeological illegal excavations and a new automatic method for looting feature extraction in desert areas. Surv. Geophys. 1–24 (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diofantos G. Hadjimitsis
    • 1
  • Kyriacos Themistocleous
    • 1
    Email author
  • Evagoras Evagorou
    • 1
  • Silas Michaelides
    • 1
  • Andreas Christofe
    • 1
  • Argyro Nisantzi
    • 1
  • Kyriacos Neocleous
    • 1
  • Christiana Papoutsa
    • 1
  • Christodoulos Mettas
    • 1
  • Marios Tzouvaras
    • 1
  • Eleni Loulli
    • 1
  • Georgia Kouta
    • 1
  • Chris Danezis
    • 1
  • Rosa Lasaponara
    • 2
  • Nicola Masini
    • 3
  • Daniele Cerra
    • 4
  • Gunter Schreier
    • 4
  • George Papadavid
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering and Geomatics, ERATOSTHENES Research CentreCyprus University of TechnologyLimassolCyprus
  2. 2.National Research Council, Institute of Methodologies for Environmental Analysis, C.da S. LoyaTito ScaloItaly
  3. 3.National Research Council, Institute for Archaeological and Monumental HeritageTito ScaloItaly
  4. 4.Earth Observation Center (EOC), German Aerospace Center (DLR)OberpfaffenhofenGermany
  5. 5.Agricultural Research Institute (ARI), Pafos District OfficePaphosCyprus

Personalised recommendations