Advertisement

A Consortium Blockchain System for Verifying Digital Contents on Traditional Costumes

  • Eun-jin Kim
  • Jeongmin Yu
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11196)

Abstract

Many countries and organizations have an archive database for the digital preservation of cultural heritage. As recording cultural heritage data becomes more common, the importance of a reliable database is emphasized. However, if the verification of the produced digital heritage content is not correct, continuous errors are yielded in their applications and cultural heritage is misinterpreted. In this paper, we propose a consortium blockchain system for verifying digital cultural heritage contents. Blockchains, which have been applied to various fields recently, are a distributed data storage technology proposed by Satoshi Nakamoto. Blockchains are attracting attention as a technique for creating and storing reliable records owing to its property that it cannot be arbitrarily changed. We propose a verification system that is organized by three expert groups for assessment: researchers, curators, and artisans. The three expert groups review the digital heritage content and finally approve the content via a consensus process. To this end, the approved digital content is created as a block and stored in a blockchain record. We expect that the proposed consortium blockchain system will obtain efficiency and reliability in the screening process by leaving a reliable record of the digital content.

Keywords

Consortium blockchain Digital contents of cultural heritage Verification system Smart contract 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by 2018 Support Project for Academic Research in Korea National University of Cultural Heritage.

References

  1. 1.
    UNESCO: Charter on the preservation of the digital heritage (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    UNESCO: Guidelines for the selection of digital content for long-term digital preservation (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smithsonian 3D.https://3d.si.edu/
  4. 4.
    Europeana collections. https://www.europeana.eu/portal/en
  5. 5.
    Koller, D., Frischer, B., Humphreys, G.: Research challenges for digital archives of 3D cultural heritage models. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. (JOCCH) 2(3), 7 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1145/1658346.1658347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Felicetti, A., Lorenzini, M.: Metadata and tools for integration and preservation of cultural heritage 3D information. Geoinformatics FCE CTU 6, 118–124 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.14311/gi.6.16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thwaites, H.: Digital heritage: what happens when we digitize everything? In: Ch′ng, E., Gaffney, V., Chapman, H. (eds.) Visual Heritage in the Digital Age. SSCC, pp. 327–348. Springer, London (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5535-5_17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lemieux, V.L.: Trusting records: is Blockchain technology the answer? Rec. Manag. J. 26(2), 110–139 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-12-2015-0042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nakamoto, S.: Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. White paper (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gaetani, E., Aniello, L., Baldoni, R. et al.: Blockchain-based database to ensure data integrity in cloud computing environments. In: Italian Conference on Cybersecurity, Venice, Italy, 17–20 Jan 2017, p. 10 (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Christidis, K., Devetsikiotis, M.: Blockchains and smart contracts for the internet of things. IEEE Access 4, 2292–2303 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2566339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zyskind, G., Nathan, O.: Decentralizing privacy: using Blockchain to protect personal data. In: 2015 IEEE Anonymous Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW), pp. 180–184. IEEE (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1109/spw.2015.27
  13. 13.
    Lee, W.K., Jin, J., Lee, M.: A Blockchain-based identity management service supporting robust identity recovery. Int. J. Secur. Technol. Smart Device 4(1), 29–34 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim, H.M., Laskowski, M.: Toward an ontology-driven blockchain design for supply-chain provenance. Intell. Syst. Account. Financ. Manag. 25(1), 18–27 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1002/isaf.1424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhu, Y., Riad, K., Guo, R., et al.: New instant confirmation mechanism based on interactive incontestable signature in consortium Blockchain. Front. Comput. Sci. 1–16 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-017-6338-8
  16. 16.
    Tapscott, D., Tapscott, A.: Blockchain Revolution: How the Technology Behind Bitcoin is Changing Money, Business, and the World. Penguin, London (2016). ISBN 9781511357692Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Buterin, V.: A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. White paper (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Woo, Y.: The king’s yung-bok attire in sang-bang-jeong-rye (2015). https://blog.naver.com/dndudwp99/220495798524
  19. 19.
    Banquet for the elderly people given at naknamheon (1795)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Royal banquet in the year of musin (1848)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Culturecontent.com. http://www.culturecontent.com/

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Digital Heritage Industry, Graduate School of Convergence Cultural HeritageKorea National University of Cultural HeritageBuyeo-gunKorea

Personalised recommendations