Advertisement

Digital Interpretation and Presentation for Monuments Built by ARCHES - Take Kinmen Area Heritage as an Example

  • Wun-Bin Yang
  • Jihn-Fa Jan
  • Tsung-Juang Wang
  • Yi-Chou Lu
  • Chiao-Ling Kuo
  • Ya-Ning YenEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11196)

Abstract

Conserving and preserving the national heritage reflects important cultural stewardship and the application of ARCHES provides for robust international interoperability of this heritage. In recent years, Taiwan has promoted protection and management of historic architecture and cultural heritage, through completion of a series of databases and inquiry platforms for the cultural heritage. However, there remains a significant digital divide between domestic integrated digital data exchange performance and international standards. Hence, Taiwan is focusing on integrating multi-source digital data and database exchange services with complete ontologies and taxonomies in conjunction with the latest global developments. This study constructs ontological metadata for registration and designation of historical architecture. The ontology, based on the CIDOC CRM, is used to import the contents of the current national cultural heritage database in Taiwan to build the ontology model of registration and designation of historical architecture; and the results are displayed through the network platform. The results indicate that new interpretative data models can improve mutual exchange of information and attain the purpose of heritage educational promotion. The metadata structure is built by using the ontology model according to international standards. It provides a positive structure for conveying Taiwan cultural heritage throughout the world.

Keywords

Ontology Cultural heritage Historic architecture CIDOC CRM Arches 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study is sponsored by the Bureau of Cultural Heritage, Ministry of Cultural for 2018 Research and Development Project Plan (107-6).

References

  1. 1.
    Ministry of Culture.: Cultural heritage preservation act. Ministry of Culture (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W3C eGov Wiki.: Linked Open Data. https://www.w3.org/egov/wiki/Linked_Open_Data. Accessed 30 May 2018
  3. 3.
    Pattuelli, M.C.: Modeling a domain ontology for cultural heritage resources: a user-centered approach. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 62(2), 314–342 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Crofts, N., Doerr, M., Gill, T., Stead, S., Stiff, M.: Definition of CIDOC CRM version 5.0.2 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Staab, S., Studer, M.: Handbook on Ontologies. Springer, Heidelberg (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hernández, F., Rodrigo, L., Contreras, J., Carbone, F.: Building a cultural heritage ontology for Cantabria. In: Annual Conference of CIDOC, pp. 1–14 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vlachidis, A., Bikakis, A., Kyriaki-Manessi, D., Triantafyllou, I., Antoniou, A.: The CrossCult knowledge base: a co-inhabitant of cultural heritage ontology and vocabulary classification. In: Kirikova, M., et al. (eds.) ADBIS 2017. CCIS, vol. 767, pp. 353–362. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67162-8_35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hu, J., Lv, Y.C., Zhang, M.: The ontology design of intangible cultural heritage based on CIDOC CRM. Int. J. U-E-Serv., Sci. Technol. 7(1), 261–274 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pramartha, C., Davis, J.G., Kuan, K.K.Y.: Digital preservation of cultural heritage: an ontology- based approach. In: The 28th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Doerr, M., Theodoridou, M.: CRMdig: a generic digital provenance model for scientific observation. In: TaPP 2011 3rd USENIX Workshop on the Theory and Practice of Provenance, Heraklion, Greece (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Le Boeuf, P.: A strange model named FRBROO. Cat. Classif. Q. 50(5–7), 422–438 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Doerr, M., et al.: CRMarchaeo: modelling context, stratigraphic unit, excavated matter. In: 29th CRM-SIG Meeting, Heraklion, Greece (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Niang, C., et al.: Supporting semantic interoperability in conservation-restoration domain: the PARCOURS Project. ACM J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 10(3), 16:1–16:20 (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    National Cultural Heritage Database Management System. https://nchdb.boch.gov.tw/. Accessed 30 May 2018
  15. 15.
    Arches, What is Arches?. https://www.archesproject.org/what-is-arches/. Accessed 16 Apr 2018
  16. 16.
    Farallon Geographics.: Arches-HIP Documentation release 1.0. Chap. 3, pp. 13–19 (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wun-Bin Yang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jihn-Fa Jan
    • 3
  • Tsung-Juang Wang
    • 1
  • Yi-Chou Lu
    • 2
  • Chiao-Ling Kuo
    • 4
  • Ya-Ning Yen
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.National Taipei University of TechnologyTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.China University of TechnologyTaipeiTaiwan
  3. 3.National Chengchi UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  4. 4.Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia SinicaTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations