Advertisement

Simulation of an Archaeological Disaster: Reassembling a Fragmented Amphora Using the Thickness Profile Method

  • Michail I. Stamatopoulos
  • Christos-Nikolaos AnagnostopoulosEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11196)

Abstract

In this paper, we simulate the incredible story of the Francois Vase, on a remarkable ancient amphora depicting Achilles and Briseis exhibited in the provincial museum Sigismondo Castromediano in Lecce, Italy. A high precision handmade replica of the original red-figure style masterpiece, 50 cm tall, from the collection of the museum in Lecce was built, fully decorated in our laboratory and then intentionally destroyed simulating the archaeological disaster of the Francois Vase. The handmade amphora (i.e. replica) was broken in 507 fragments, out of which 148 sherds (or ostraca) were offered for digital restoration through the Thickness Profile method on an on-going project.

Keywords

Pottery reassembly Thickness profile 3D reconstruction Sherds 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the archaeologist Mrs. Mairy Giamalidi for her valuable archaeological assistance.

References

  1. 1.
    Angelo, L., Stefano, P., Pane, C.: Automatic dimensional characterisation of pottery. J. Cult. Herit. 26, 118–128 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huang, Q., Flory, S., Gelfand, N., Hofer, M., Pottmann, H.: Reassembling fractured objects by geometric matching. ACM Trans. Graph. 25(3), 569–578 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kotoula, E.: Semiautomatic fragments matching and virtual reconstruction: a case study on ceramics. Int. J. Conserv. Sci. 7(1), 71–86 (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kampel, M., Sablatnig, R.: Detection of matching fragments of pottery. In: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, beyond the artifact digital interpretation of the past, Prato, Italy (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Willis, A., Cooper, D.: Bayesian assembly of 3D axially symmetric shapes from fragments. In: Conference on CVPR, Washington, U.S.A., vol. 1, pp. 82–89 (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Son, K., Almeida, E., Cooper, D.: Axially symmetric 3D pots configuration system using axis of symmetry and break curve. In: CVPR, IEEE Conference, pp. 257–264 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stamatopoulos, M., Anagnostopoulos, C.: A totally new digital 3D approach for reassembling fractured archaeological potteries using thickness measurements. Acta IMEKO 6(3), 18–28 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Toby, S.: Athenian Vase Construction: A Potter’s Analysis. The J. Paul Getty Museum, California (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lesley, C.: An Introduction to Drawing Archaeological Pottery, Institute for Archaeologists SHES (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michail I. Stamatopoulos
    • 1
  • Christos-Nikolaos Anagnostopoulos
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Social Sciences School, Cultural Technology and Communication DepartmentUniversity of the AegeanMytilene, Lesvos IslandGreece

Personalised recommendations