Advertisement

Performativity, Assemblage, Affect

  • Anna Hickey-MoodyEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Deleuze’s thought offers new methods for thinking about traditional themes in masculinity studies and it introduces concepts that bring a fresh approach to how I see masculinity and undertake masculinity studies as a discipline.

Works Cited

  1. Allan, J. A. (2018). Masculinity as cruel optimism. NORMA International Journal for Masculinity Studies, 13(3–4), 175–190.  https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2017.1312949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Behrend-Martínez, E. (2007). Unfit for marriage: Impotent spouses on trial in the Basque region of Spain. Reno: University of Nevada Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, J. (2004). The force of things: Steps toward an ecology of matter. Political Theory, 32(3), 347–372.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591703260853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borland, J., & Coelli, M. (2015). Information technology and the Australian labour market. Australia’s future workforce (pp. 131–141).Google Scholar
  5. Braidotti, R. (1996). Patterns of dissonance (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Braidotti, R. (2000). Teratologies, Deleuze and feminist theory (pp. 156–172). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Butler, J. (1988). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal, 40(4), 519–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Butler, J. (1993). Critically queer. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 1, 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Butler, J. (1995). Melancholy gender-refused identification. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 5(2), 165–180.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10481889509539059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Butler, J. (2015). Notes toward a performative theory of assembly. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Campana, J. (2015). Distribution, assemblage, capacity: New keywords for masculinity? European Review of History, 22(4), 691–697.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13507486.2015.1028337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clough, P. T., & Halley, J. (2007). The affective turn: Theorizing the social. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen, J. (1996). James Ellroy, Los Angeles and the spectacular crisis of masculinity. Women: A Cultural Review, 7(1), 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09574049608578254.Google Scholar
  15. Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person, and sexual politics. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Danvers, E. (2016). Criticality’s affective entanglements: Rethinking emotion and critical thinking in higher education. Gender and Education, 28(2), 282–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davies, C. (1997). Modernity, masculinity and imperfect cinema in cuba. Screen, 38(4), 345–359.  https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/38.4.345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Deleuze, G. (1988). Spinoza: Practical philosophy (R. Hurley, Trans.). San Francisco: City Light Books.Google Scholar
  19. Deleuze, G. (1990). Expressionism in philosophy: Spinoza (M. Joughin, Trans.). New York, NY: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  20. Deleuze, G. (2003). Francis Bacon: The logic of sensation (D. W. Smith, Trans.). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  21. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1984). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (R. Hurley, M. Seem, & H. R. Lane, Trans., Vol. 1). Minneapolis and New York: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  22. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans., Vol. 2). London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  23. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1998). What is philosophy (H. Tomlinson and G. Burchell, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Duff, C. (2017). The affective right to the city. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 42, 516–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Felski, R. (1995). The gender of modernity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Gatens, M., & Lloyd, G. (1999). Collective imaginings. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington, USA: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Haywood, C., & Mac an Ghaill, M. (2003). Men and masculinities. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hickey-Moody, A. (2009). Unimaginable bodies: Intellectual disability, performance and becomings. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.Google Scholar
  30. Hickey-Moody, A. (2010). Youth arts and the differential becoming of the world. Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 24(2), 203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hickey-Moody, A. (2013). Youth, arts and education: Reassembling subjectivity through affect (p. 176). Volume 85 of Routledge Advances in Sociology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Hardwick, J. (2015). Policing paternity: Historicising masculinity and sexuality in early-modern France. European Review of History: Revue européenne d’histoire, 22(4), 643–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hickey-Moody, A., & Mallins, P. (Eds.). (2008). Deleuzian encounters: Studies in contemporary social issues. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  34. Hickey-Moody, A., & Rasmussen, M. L. (2009). The sexed subject in-between Deleuze and Butler. Deleuze and queer theory (pp. 37–53).Google Scholar
  35. Horrocks, R. (1994). Masculinity in crisis: Myths, fantasies and realities. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kane, B. (2015). Masculinity and political geographies in England, Ireland and North America. European Review of History: Revue européenne d'histoire, 22(4), 595–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kimmel, M. (1992). The contemporary ‘crisis’ of masculinity in historical perspective. In H. Brod (Ed.), The making of masculinities: The new men’s studies (pp. 121–153). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Mac an Ghaill, M. (1994). The making of men: Masculinities, sexualities and schooling. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  39. McDonald, T. H. (2016). Conceptualizing an ethology of masculinities. Men and Masculinities, 21(1), 56–71.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184x16652662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Niccolini, A. D. (2016). Terror(ism) in the classroom: Censorship, affect and uncivil bodies. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 29(7), 893–910.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2016.1174897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Probyn, E. (2000). Sporting bodies: Dynamics of shame and pride. Body & Society, 6(1), 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Renold, E., & Ringrose, J. (2017). Selfies, relfies and phallic tagging: Posthuman participations in teen digital sexuality assemblages. Educational, Philosophy and Theory, 49, 1066–1079.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1185686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ringrose, J., & Renold, E. (2014). “F** k Rape!” Exploring affective intensities in feminist research assemblage. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 772–780.Google Scholar
  44. Simel, G. (1984). On women, sexuality and love. New Haven, CT: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Spinoza, B. (1677/2001). Ethics (E. M. Curley & S. Hampshire, Trans., 6th ed.). London: Penguin Classics. (Original work published in 1677)Google Scholar
  46. Todd, S., Jones, R., & O’Donnell, A. (2016). Special issue of gender and education: Shifting education’s philosophical imaginaries. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  47. Waitt, G., & Stanes, E. (2015). Sweating bodies: Men, masculinities, affect, emotion. Geoforum, 59, 30–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.12.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Witz, A. (2001). Georg Simmel and the masculinity of modernity. Journal of Classical Sociology, 1, 353–370.  https://doi.org/10.1177/14687950122232585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Witz, A., & Marshall, B. L. (2003). The quality of manhood: Masculinity and embodiment in the sociological tradition. Sociological Review, 51(3), 339–356.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Media and CommunicationRoyal Melbourne Institute of TechnologyMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations