The Ends of Your Means
This chapter lays out the first steps to bringing closure to an empirical study. Above all, this involves pursuing “coherence,” in which the study’s findings, economic theory, and vernacular knowledge about the phenomenon of interest coalesce into a logically consistent, unified whole. The pursuit of coherence is multifaceted, and extends to the larger literature to which the study belongs. These ideas inform studies of the demand for cigarettes, zero tolerance drunk driving laws, The Great Moderation, and more.
- Becker G, Grossman M, Murphy K (1994) An empirical analysis of cigarette addiction. Am Econ Rev 84(3):396–418Google Scholar
- Bernhardt D, Heston S (2010) Point shaving in college basketball: a cautionary tale for forensic economics. Econ Inq 48(2):207–210Google Scholar
- Borghesi R (2008) Widespread corruption in sports gambling: fact or fiction? South Econ J 74(4):1063–1069Google Scholar
- Diemer G, Leeds M (2013) Failing to cover: point shaving or statistical abnormality? Int J Sport Finance 8(3):175–191Google Scholar
- Hingson R, Heeren T, Morelock S (1989) Effects of Maine’s 1982 .02 law to reduce teenage driving after drinking. Alcohol Drugs Driving 5(1):25–36Google Scholar